JoPoy88

He was a closet Pats fan anyways

Bye bye and thanks for the LAMP

Yeah I have trouble interpreting the ravings of scared, sad little regressives. I’m trying to learn though.

well if your doomsday scenario of this runaway slippery slope of wokeness actually occurs then I’ll be sure to give you full credit for predicting it. and you’re the karen in this thread, not sure how you misused that term so completely.

lol. Never seen more effort put into such a flimsy strawman. A. No one does the bolded, except perhaps the fellow seniles in your inner circle. B. How about just calling them Washington when referring to their past? Are there two Washington football teams? Who’s the other one?

Excellent over-exaggeration. The other CHUDs in this thread would be proud.

Very INteresting indeed

I’d give them a 4th round pick and I’d throw in Duke Williams

yeah try to gaslight me - I’m the one who can’t read. Hopefully your next time out is soon guy. Your act is tired.

Lol. Yes you did miss it again, “again.” You didn’t even address any of the things I mentioned. You’re willfully ignorant. Luckily for you, that’s pretty popular nowadays. Keep fear mongering though, I’m sure you’ll get at least a few converts with this crowd.

and you miss the point entirely once again. Those Native American-derived names are not viewed as offensive. The Redskins are. BTW, the Braves’ “tomahawk chop” chant was phased out for the exact same reason that Washington is facing calls to change their name, so do a least a modicum of research before starting a thread. I know your itching to get back into this but don’t go out of your way to make yourself look ignorant. The calls to change the franchise’s name were coming before “cancel culture” really even became a thing. ”Redskins” derives from the term used to describe bounties put on the scalps of slain Native Americans. If you think that’s okay, then okay.

I mean maybe that’s why I said “presumptive” but if he really rolls in there and doesn’t win the job from Stidham then he doesn’t even deserve the contract he got, horrible that it is.

eh, this is pretty much what everyone has said about Allen and his deep passing - not enough arc on throws and poor lower body mechanics at times.

Good. Honestly this should be permanent. The only thing more pointless in the NFL than preseason is the Pro Bowl.

I would hope the NFL doesn't think its fans are as dumb as that scenario suggests (but who knows.) I think there is a more mundane reason for this waiver requirement - the NFL's and the teams' liability insurance carriers are probably insisting on it.

This deal has to make Cam the cheapest presumptive starting QB in the league by far, right?

How many other past or present NFL owners have statues? I was only aware of the Richardson one.

All true. I’ll get scared of this when I see Cam at 100% 2015 Cam. Until I see that, to me this is Bill picking up scraps.

God every time you post - in stitches, I swear. So so funny. Leno funny. You’re funnier than @4merper4mer and that’s saying A LOT ?

He’s not suspended so far as I know - his legal issues are still under review by the league last I checked. So if and/or when any suspension or other punishment is laid down by the league, I’m sure those steps to get back in will be provided to him. He’s free to sign with any team right now. Granted, teams may be hesitant to sign him now if his legal trouble is still under review, but that’s his fault, not the interested teams’ nor the league’s. Look, AB’s not the type it seems to willingly commit to therapy, and that fact probably has already cost him millions, and will likely cost him millions more. That is entirely his fault. Personally I don’t care if he really does have 5 more 1,000 yard seasons in him and we never see it. Plenty of other stars to watch in the league.

he’s rich enough to get his own therapy. He’s not employed by any NFL team. Given his tenure in the league, he probably still has league-provided health care. But they can’t compel him to seek treatment (there’s laws against that), so I don’t know what “look out” for him really means. You tell me.

oh yes. Let’s have the league push for this guy’s return after a extremely public mental break and subsequent legal issues. “He’s got good football left” so let’s have Rog urge some team to sign him and possibly blow up their locker room. That sounds, I can’t even say how that sounds without getting banned.

Both are true but from what I saw of Lamar last year, those outside-the-numbers throws are UGLY. personally I don’t think there’s a problem with hollywood brown or whoever else they got lining up outside. And I don’t think AB would help much either. The problem is Lamar and his limitations. Good thing for Baltimore, he’s so great at everything else it doesn’t matter much (except to his wideout’s numbers.) please. Baltimore would sign him. He can play with his cousin. Maybe the younger one can keep him in line.

What “trial”? He plead guilty to everything to avoid the death penalty. Did I skip to another timeline or something Vader?

Is it up there for football reasons?