MasterStrategist

I was also at the game and did NOT notice this altercation on the sideline at all. @Chandler#81 or any mod, are we just taking 1 posters word for it and running with it now? Has @BADOLBILZ been critical of Beas/have a vendetta with him previously? Only ask because. again I did not witness this and this "story" has not been confirmed or mentioned by anyone....including media members. post game interviews, etc

I think this will be a key storyline after our upcoming game...specifically usage of our WRs. Will Sanders be healthy? Given McKenzie carved up Pats last game, will Beas get as much playing time? IMO, Beas has lost a step (maybe 2). He's not as dangerous against man coverage, need more speed on the field. I hope Daboll doesn't overthink this, keep with what worked until Pats prove they can stop it. BB will clearly come with a different gameplan, up to Daboll to be ready to adapt quickly if needed, but McKenzie will be on the Pats radar this time.

They didn't. We started the game on offense, and drove for a TD....few too many drinks? 😁, I'm not judging.

You think the NFL is going to schedule a 3-6, instead of 4-5? Not going to be Buffalo on MNF, regardless of who wins tonight. To me, rubber match is a baseball term. At least how I learned it growing up, maybe not many baseball fans on this board? 🤷 It is a football message board after all.

Prediction only: Saturday: Steelers at Chiefs: 4:35pm 49ers at Cowboys: 8:15pm Sunday: Pats at Bengals: 1pm Eagles at Bucs: 4:35pm Chargers at Bills: 8:15pm Monday: Cards at Rams: 8:15pm

Something simple called Google or one of 1000 sports apps... Bills won by 17 and covered the 16.5 spread.

1 MNF game...and agree, it makes more sense to put a 4/5 for a couple reasons: 1. Mnf is the worse day to play, less rest for winner in round 2. Assuming all favorites win, then 4th seed should get this game. 2. 2nd round of games is most contingent on 2/7 and 3/6 outcomes, so in theory, if you put a non-4/5 on Mnf, it would delay opponents knowing who/where they play in round 2. I think Rams/Cards on MNF is a great matchup and showcases that stadium, that's my prediction

I doubt they put anything but a 4-5 matchup on MNF, since that will delay knowing who will be playing who/where in Round 2. Us and Dallas are currently the 4 seeds. With Dallas flexed to Sat this week, not sure if the NFL is going to give them essentially 2 extra rest days...so I do think if it ends up as the current seeding aligns, then we will play on MNF. I'm rooting for anytime on Sunday.

Agree, this is not the typical Browns offensive strategy. And they are ignoring what has been working against Pitt. Maybe evaluating Baker? Strange either way

It's been discussed in a multitude of posts & reasoning already, but I wanted to provide some statistics & context to highlight why I think yesterday's offensive performance is one of the most dominating/strong showings this season. Much has also been made of Josh's underwhelming QBR performance, 17 rating, so wanted to touch on that (see points #2-4). The turnovers absolutely need to be cleaned up, but I'd call 2 of those "flukes" (tip passes) and the 3rd should have been illegal contact (while Beas running the seam route). Not an excuse, but this could have easily been another 40+ point showing by the offense. I was also encouraged to see the run game pick up chunk plays & convert in the redzone. Key Points/Statistics (based on re-watching the game & tracking each play): 1. Dominating performance/Maintaining Drives: 71 Plays / 4 - 10+ Play Drives / 351 Yards / 28 - 1st Downs / 34 Min TOP / 80% Redzone efficiency. 2. Misleading Stat of the Day: 11-26 Passing, 42% completion %. It's misleading because Josh completed 5/8 3rd down passes (4 going for 1st downs & the 5th leading to a 4th and 1 conversion). 3. Context is important Stats: 9 incompletions were due to Drops and/or Throw-Away passes (ie: to Dion at the goalline or screen to Motor, etc). Josh also faced pressure on 10 of 26 attempts, only completing 3 of those passes. 4. "Clutch" stat of the day: of Josh's 11 completions, 8 went for 1st downs (5 coming on 3rd down). 5. "Make it Count" stat: on 4 separate occasions, Josh threw incompletions on 1st and/or 2nd down, to then follow-up with a 3rd down pass to convert the 1st. Said another way, he went 4-10 (40% completion rate) on a sequence of plays that extended drives. This is like sitting down at a blackjack table, betting $100 and losing on 2 hands in a row, then betting $300 on the 3rd hand and winning (you'd have an extra $100 in your pocket, but lost 2 of 3 hands). 6. No Punt Game (safety doesn't count...Part 2): 2nd consecutive game w/o a Punt. Same as against New England, Josh & the offense are converting critical 3rd and 4th downs to extend drives & score. We're not seeing drives stall at Opposition 40 or 30 yard line, like we did at mid-season, and that's an encouraging sign heading into the playoffs. Note: See the chart below for a quick summary of these stats. Bottom line, it's easy to look at some stats and come away with the impression that the offense struggled to move the ball or had a poor showing due to turnovers/etc. In contrast, they were "inefficient" at times but came through in the clutch when needed. I like another posters analogy of a "no-hitter, but walking 5 batters/3 errors". We dominated TOP, ran extended drives, and had our best showing of the season in the ground game, to go along with very good redzone efficiency. Yes the turnovers need cleaned up, as our defense stepped up to limit the damage, but this type of performance is MILES ahead of where we were at mid-season (ie: think back to the Jaguars game). This is also the 2nd consecutive game with I 100% believe that Daboll/McDermott have made some critical changes to the offensive approach, to go along with better execution by the players.

Agree about the Raiders/Chargers, and general line of thinking for Saturday. Nfl doesn't "want" to introduce any unfair advantages either. Might be indicative of who will be scheduled for wild card Saturday as well. I think Rams/49ers will be a good matchup and meets criteria to "flex", but think NFL keeps them and the Cardinal game scheduled at 4:25 on Sunday.

Zero reason to put New England/Miami on a flex game, Miami is out of playoffs and Pats essentially playing to keep their 5th seed.

Your guess for Sunday night then? I'd think Raiders vs Chargers will be the Snf pick.

Any rumors or official time when NFL is supposed to announce Saturday "flex" games? Just looking at the week 18 slate of games, this has to be on a short list (albeit, possibly at the end) of considerations.

I'm thinking the following will be NFLs choices (for Sat and Sun night): 1. Chargers vs Raiders: HUGE playoff implications, my guess for Sunday night 2. Rams vs 49ers: 49ers fighting for a playoff spot win and in, and Rams for the division title (assuming Cards win tonight). 3. Bills vs Jets OR Eagles vs Cowboys: Bills fighting for a division title. Eagles fighting for a playoff spot, win and in, and 2 potential playoff teams. Will be interesting, I'd put the Bills/Jets at the lowest chance of those listed above, but it likely is under consideration.

Living in Pittsburgh, it's constantly the talk of fans/media that they'll get Russ or Rodgers. But those media clued in don't believe it, and I find it difficult to believe too. Steelers will roll with Rudolph, very likely, with a draft pick behind him. Their roster is no where near a super bowl caliber team. Their defense has underperformed, as the rush defense fell apart and Haden is out of the lineup alot (he's also gone after this yr) in a suspect secondary. Their oline is worse than ours and needs alot of work. My guess is the Broncos will find a way to lure in a QB in the AFC, or Saints would be an interesting team to watch.

Wentz is the 2nd to last QB that I'd want starting, from the current AFC playoff teams. But, he's still "average" to slightly above average with the way teams have to defend Indys run game. Wentz is very good at getting them into the right play at the line. The drop-off to Ehlinger will be significant. I haven't looked at tiebreaker, but would expect Vegas gives them a great game and potentially a loss.

I think for vaccinated individuals only, but I could be wrong. But agree, will have to wait and see what NFL rule changes might be coming in advance of playoffs.

He sees a pulling guard, his "key / gap assignment", is to scrape not sit and wait for a cutback. On his "hokey pokey" as you call it (or angle route), that's the most difficult route for a MLB to cover 1-1. He also covered it great 3x during the game. How about the NE 4th and 1, where they ran a stretch to the weak side and Edmunds made an unbelievable play to scrape and tackle him for a gain of 3 (otherwise that might have been a huge play)? How about his "insticts" on the many times NE tried to hit Hunter Henry on deeper drags but Edmunds was there to pick it up? Both Sean and Frazier have said high remarks about Tremaine, and we as fans don't know the exact assignment on each play. I'll go with their judgment and what my eyes tell me, which is he's a above average MLB (not a superstar) but very good and gives them a lot of options in pass coverage/disguises/blitzes because of his skills.

He's still "upset", that he was called out following his ridiculous question. What a joke.

This is called taking the "low road", get a clue. Be happy for the effort and outcome of the game! Great win for the franchise and BillsMafia.

Yes and no. Pinning them back, failing the 4th, had a big impact on their playcalling/execution. Key was getting 7 just now

Good call. Be interesting to see his playing time, I'm surprised but trust the coaching staff

We will see tomorrow. Will stop back to discuss.

Didn't realize there is a deadline to retire/say he needs personal time? Not saying that's what's happening, but there is no deadline for what I'm referring to.