dje85

Yup, they all just talk in hypotheticals before the tampering period. By saying things like what do you expect your client to want, or hypothetically if we offered such and such money would your client be interested come free agency. By now I bet most the big name free agents already got their teams lined up outside of the few that want to make visits first.

I'm not sure, I know the Bills want us to believe that and he may have been but I believe the Bills wanted a DE rotation and sort of pidgeon hole selected a second DE. Probably earlier than they would have since Basham was higher on their board than other De's available that they felt they could get later on. That said I hope he wasn't a true bpa pick to the Bills at that point. If so then we have a huge scouting problem. I threw things when we chose Basham over several other prospects at that point. Though I admit a few of those guys I would of preferred at that time have been non existant and terrible as well. Poor draft that year imo but one of the top guys I wanted at that time who I feel should of been a no brainer top bpa pick was Creed Humprey.

I want BPA, I don't care if it is offense or Defense. At pick 28 you shouldn't pigeon hole into a position. Outside of qb or obvious positions you don't pick in the 1st like punter every position should be in play. If you pigeon your hole choices that is how you wind up making decisions like taking Boogie Basham over Creed Humphrey back in 2021. Just give me bpa after plugging our blatant holes in free agency before hand with cheap solid to average veterans.

Ravens won't trade Lamar imo unless Lamar holds out into preseason and they are offered a fortune in picks similar to what the Browns spent on Watson.

KC because I never thought it was possible but every Bengals fan I have dealt with were giant a wads. Not fair to judge a fan group on twitter interactions but there were a lot of them.

We do Ed Oliver

The revamped dt position and dline as a whole help Frazier game plan for Henry. Run D was our biggest issue last year and it looks like it may be a strength this year.

I want to say Bills by two scores but between the trip across the country creating jetlag and the brutal heat that is rumored to be in play tonight. I think it will be close and wouldn't be surprised if the Rams win.

1. No 2. Not allowed on the sidelines allowed to be at the stadium 3. Yes 4. No

Only 20ish more to go..

Hopefully Keenum goes to the bench so we can score some points now.

Sweeney got manhandled. Terrible blocking attempt.

he refs have been giving us ***** spots all game. Re-donk-ulous.

Pretty sure it's any discipline at all including suspension, discipline or even cutting (though I'm sure it'd have to be proven he was cut specifically due to the action and it was not performance related).

NFLPA rules dictate the Bills can't suspend him for something he did while not under contract of the Buffalo Bills. It'd be like your boss suspending you for no pay while in college before you got your job.

She claimed they had sex outside of the house before she was later brought into and raped inside. He didn't have to be part of the inside house incident to have given her an std.

Araiza is a professional sports player who was just signed to a pro sports contract. That means he can pay. The other two are no names who likely will no longer be playing college sports regardless as one was a redshirt and the other already wasn't returning prior to this civil suit. The lawyer doesn't care about the non famous guys who can't pay up in a civil suit. Why would he? Civil suits won't lead to prosecution. The suit is just about getting paid. The others will likely get a lot more attention come the prosecution if it ever occurs.

No, I am correct as I went on a California law website and pulled the specific law subset that pertains. But agree to disagree if you want who am I to judge you?

Because he is a bad punter? Guy was 22nd or worse in every statistic in every category in the NFL last year. We can get a guy as good or better off the street after cuts.

This is incorrect. Earlier in the post I debunked this. There is a law where if the individual did so unknowingly it is on the accuser/ law enforcement/ accusers legal team to prove beyond a doubt the individual knew the accuser was under age.

They also said Ford was one of their best olinemen this year and we all know that isn't true or we wouldn't of traded him. We have this thing about keeping our best talent. Everything Beane and McDermott say about a player is 100% the truth take it to the bank. But this is besides the point. I said he stunk and needed to be replaced as he was easily replaceable by someone as talented or better. So I'm happy he is gone regardless of the Araiza issue now. And you said he was a good team mate? Who cares? That is not a good reason to keep him.

When drunk logic gets thrown out the window. Not many go get stupid drunk and plan on getting behind a wheel until they are drunk either. But it happens, and happens a lot.

That is all conjecture. How do you how good of a team mate he was? Were you on the team? If he was good a his job and not the 22nd or worse at his position last year in all punter categories he wouldn;t of been replaceable / replaced. Which he absolutely is.

No he isn't or the cops wouldn't of asked her to ask him again. Per the LA Times article - Later in the conversation, she asked him, “And did we have actual sex?” Araiza allegedly changed his tone and replied, “This is Matt Araiza. I don’t remember anything that happened that night.”

This could be why the Bills aren't just canning him like many want them to as well. If he isn;t subject tot he leagues personal policy conduct and then was cut just because of this the Bills and NFL could have a major lawsuit on their hands in regards from Araiza imo.