TheWeatherMan

Not all that surprising, considering he is a pass catching TE on an offense that: 1. Is #1 scoring offense in the NFL 2. Has has no demonstrated #1 WR 3. Is built on the principle of wide spread (everyone eats) distribution of the football. 4. Has the best QB in football. IMHO., the fact that he’s only considered #10, is a detriment to his performance to date.

Hedging you pass rush bets on Bosa is such a big gamble. We only have three players capable of getting to the QB and one is a rookie. If Bosa is not available we better pray our secondary is vastly improved.

Whatever you say Sean…

Yes, we don’t want Von running past Josh Allen in the backfield, that would be awful.

This is his MJS’s MO, expect nothing less. Best to Ignore and move on.

Yep, jumped the gun on that one, but I corrected myself so not sure why you feel the need to point that out. Even though Buffalo is not centrally located like the Bengals, they have the 2nd least amount of miles traveled in the league this year. I’m still willing to bet that this is the least amount of miles traveled in a season by Buffalo.

Based on previous results from a large sample size, there’s an equal percent chance of Rapp breaking one of his teammates in half.

I can guarantee you the Bills travel less miles this season than any team has in the history of the 16+ game NFL season. Every game the Bills play away are either on the East Coast in the North East except Texans. The only games 1000+ miles away are the Texans and Phins. This is the most favorable schedule ever…no excuses not to take the #1 seed. Edit: The bengals have the lowest because they are centrally located and also have a very light travel schedule. The Bills come in at #2 traveling approx 10,500 miles in total this season or 650 miles (one way) on average.

My fat a$$ fits perfectly on my couch in front of my 70” TV, where I have unlimited access to cheap beer and fattening food. I love the stadium experience, but not at these out of control prices. One years worth of season tickets for two will pay for a new TV, couch, surround sound, buffalo bills decor and all the snacks/beer you can eat!

The CB/S from Ohio St. With how awful the S’s looked last year he might win a starting role.

Unreal,he’s already better than Elam.

No

Tanking for Manning would be the only objective in trading Watt.

There are 5 receivers that are locks on this roster and there is a large stable of guys battling for the 6th. Only way I see Gabe on the Bills is on the practice squad.

There’s no doubt that offense isn’t a problem in the playoffs, it’s the Defense. The real debate is to whether it’s: 1. situational coaching and ability to make adjustments. 2. The overall defensive scheme 3. Quality of play / injuries or 4. A little of all the above

Your assumption is correct.

I’d prefer a starting safety over a potential #3, #4 or #5 WR. Praying we’re not going into the season with the same starting safety tandem as last year 🤮.

Commanders vs Bears at #6 is hilarious. That wouldn’t make my top 100.

He’s listed as 6’ 1” on the Bills website Edit: 6’ 4”, I’m blind

Cheaper and provided a red zone target.

So we have 6 receivers on the roster all 6’ 1” or under. In fact we only have two receivers over 6’ 1” and that Shavers and the 7th round rookie. This is going to be fun to watch…aim small miss small Josh.

Yes, I’m looking forward to more of your well thought out and thorough posts based on super in depth research 😂

👏🏿 Bravo, that’s a nice and thorough review of FA cap space and draft capital spent on offense vs defense. The focus on the # of picks spent overall as the delineating factor was well thought out. I’m wrong, we’ve obviously prioritized offense over defense the last 7 years because the # of picks spent on offense equal that of the defense…you win buddy. 😂

All expected when you have the best QB in the NFL leading your team. Regular season success has never been a gauge in determining greatness. Being strategically dominated by the same team in the postseason for 4 of the past 5 seasons is not greatness.