Jump to content

LyndonvilleBill

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,904
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LyndonvilleBill

  1. Agree. Thank goodness for Sirius. Although it's almost making my ears bleed, it's probably better than my eyes.πŸ˜„
  2. I think a little of both. Looking at the whole play, looks like you are correct. Allen did read it well. Once Allen steps up, he never looked to the right and was fixed on Diggs.
  3. I wouldn't give a 4th. Wouldn't give anything for him. Don't get why people even want him. He's no faster than Moss, is averaging less yds per carry behind a better run blocking OL. Not even looking at his personal issues.πŸ€”. Just don't get it. Waste of trade capital IMO.
  4. With the blitz coming, I think Knox should have cut the route short and made the cut outside around the 38-39yd line. Hindsight is always 20/20 though.
  5. Agree. Grew up on a farm. I know where they grow.😱
  6. It's all in the wrist. Need to build strength. πŸ˜„
  7. Past player - Colin Kaepernick Current player- DeShaun Watson
  8. Lil' Dirty is not the reason why we are not undefeated. He was 7 for 9 in the Dolphins game and had Josh not thrown the ball into the ground McKenzie would have had a TD and won the game. Now, he had a horrible game in KC and he deserves the criticism for that performance but I think he's much better than what we just saw.
  9. Ereck Flowers (FA), Daryl Williams (FA), Risner (Denver), As you've said AJ Cann (Texans). I am sure there may be others. Maybe even a couple on PS's that may be better depth options?
  10. I think I read this somewhere...πŸ€”
  11. Crowder was on a 1 yr deal and they could also ( how dare I say this...🀫) cut Lil' Dirty.
  12. He want to play for a contender. 😁
  13. I'm going with a new friend of mine, Khalil "Swiss" Shakir on offense. On D, I think Milano is going to have another great game.
  14. It is, but is still much better than the "Eye Test" grading That many do.πŸ˜‰
  15. Maybe, but if you go to the PFF site they explain this as well. Nobodies grades will be perfect as there are too many variables. https://www.pff.com/grades
  16. Maybe I'm off, but when I look at the grades, I don't look at them individually. I only look at them to compare. So 47.2 means nothing individually, but if you compare 2 players at the same position and one is at 70 and the other at 50, it does give an idea of who played better. πŸ€”
  17. Going to say the Pat's. Someone talked about it a while back in another thread. Keep them as an average team and draft pegutory. 😁
  18. Not really. We have Singletary, Moss, Cook and heaven forbid Jones already on the 53. I think Duke is there if we need him and could fill in for the 5-10 snaps a game if really needed. It's not like he is some scrub that couldn't handle filling in IMO.
  19. Don't we still have Duke Johnson on the PS?πŸ€”
  20. Well, they wanted parityπŸ€ͺ. Although I don't think they wanted this as the outcome.😁
  21. Sorry, meant to tell you earlier. When she left this morning after breakfast, she told me to tell you no.πŸ˜„
  22. Not so sure. That's why we are discussing it. I know I keep talking about Risner. IMO he would be an upgrade. Saffold is on a 1 yr deal. Wouldn't it be better to get an experienced guard with versatility than drafting one and hope it works out? (See Cody Ford πŸ˜‰). I'm just another keyboard cowboy, not a GM, so my opinion means squat.πŸ€ͺ.
  23. Maybe. 1st was a rookie year, 2nd, new scheme 3rd he had a season playing Gap. Maybe he can be good at both Gap and Zone? Now back to Zone.
  24. Maybe we can ask Von what he thinks as well.πŸ˜‰
×
×
  • Create New...