Buffalo03

I would have liked one Monday night game. The home opener against the Bengals would have been an awesome Monday night atmosphere. but I'll take the schedule.

Along with the swimming pools and hot tubs

It's definitely not right. It was already stated that the Pats were playing Sunday night week 1 and this has Browns at Pats week 2. It was already said that the Browns play the Jets on MNF week 2

I'm sure the league would rather fold than give the Bills a SNF game

Nevermind, I got it. I misread it

Not quite sure what this means

That wouldn't make sense. 7 straight home games followed by 6 straight road games?

God...can the NFL schedule makers ever get creative? This is the 3rd year in a row that we play New England on the road week 16.

Poor Caroline, she isn't gonna stand a chance going against the entire Titans team

How would Shaq feel about this?

Except he hasn't been said to be coming in on a pre draft visit and no word from anyone on the Bills meeting with him at the combine or holding private workouts with him. I think it could be because they know they aren't taking a TE that high so they are focusing on other potential top 10 to top 15 prospects. They could also be trying to throw everyone off and make everyone think they aren't going that way and then take him at the draft. I just don't see it however

Thoughts are with her. Hope everything goes well

The black jersey? No. I feel like too many teams have a black jersey now that doesn't need them. They resemble a little bit of the 80's and 90's Jets jerseys which I always found cool

I looked it up and the Bills scored 28 points in that game. That's a hell of a tank

If you paid attention to my post you quoted earlier, I said a swap of firsts this year aling with a second round pick this year and a 3rd round pick next year. So it's not just a swap of firsts

If there is a game changing defensive player for them? absolutely. Their defense was horrendous last year and needs to be fixed badly. If a player they would really like drops, why wouldn't they?

I have said if we could work something out with the Falcons on draft day where we move down to their spot at 14 and then maybe get a late round pick back. It would be something I would do. It would probably require us throwing in a 2nd round pick this year and maybe a 3rd next year as well which I would also do. I wouldn't give up a 1st this year for Julio but if the Falcons were willing to move up to 9 to get a particular player, I wouldn't be against swaping picks with them and still aquiring Julio

I like the signing. I'm just afraid he's gonna break his wrist while sleeping tonight

I love this rule. I actually made a post about it a few days ago and people lost their minds.

You're looking too much into it. Teams have 2 score leads for majority of the game all the time and then blow them in the final 3 or 4 minutes. How is this any different? Stop the team from scoring and you won't have that problem

Comparing eliminating an onside kick to tackling? I have no words for this

Yeah, no removing the kickoff would be extremely stupid. I would not watch the NFL anymore if they did that

I have plenty of experience of watching football. Have been since I was 5. I'm now 33. And the rule I'm proposing is not the same as what was proposed in the arricle posted above and it is a better option than the onside kick the way it is now

What I'm referring to is not like what is being described in this article. The article makes it sound as though the scoring team automatically gets the ball back. I'm not for that all. What I'm proposing is they can have the option of kicking it off or going for the 4th and 15 and it's only limited to two 4th and 15's a game so if you go for them earlier in the game you're basically screwed the rest of the way. The article is in no way what I'm referring to

No, I'm not. What does that have to do with anything?