-
Posts
4,774 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Richard Noggin
-
Accuracy/efficacy is not nearly as important as ensuring LLMs are intrinsically embedded in ALL digital products. It's entirely possible that Strong could be initially better suited to the boundary role opposite Benford. And/or the Bills could platoon 2 or even 3 guys extensively. Back in the early McD years, they rotated heavily opposite Tre White.
-
Bengals bungling things up - new rookie contract clause
Richard Noggin replied to The Wiz's topic in The Stadium Wall
"Disruptors" ... lol of their own organizational cohesion Legal judgments are not always germane to League judgments, however. "Letting the legal process play out" is mostly about PR. Teams and the league can punish players independent of any criminal or civil consequences. For better and for worse, I suppose. -
Agree with both sentences, but also I REALLY don't think McD is likely to field an offense that throws at such a high % unless they're behind a lot more often than anyone would like to see. Would be super fun to just see Allen unleashed now like he was to some extent back in the Daboll days. Very unlikely, though.
-
Never.
-
No, no...his dad is Jack Nicholson.
-
Genuinely appreciate when things are spelled out for me. Sometimes we don't know what we don't know. Also, when Cook's deal is reported as a 4 year, $5.8M deal, that ramps up the compassion for a guy. The fact that he's realistically expected to make significantly more than that figure, works against the purposes of including that total in these offseason reports. (Not that $5.8M over 4 years of employment should elicit a ton of sympathy from working stiffs like many of us.)
-
Mmm...this reply makes my tummy feel all warm.
-
Fascinating that Cook's 2025 $5.3M salary (+$75k workout bonus) accounts for ~92% of his 4 year rookie contract's overall reported $5.8M value... He's on track to have earned just shy of $10M when he becomes eligible for FA in 2026. Why is his deal reported the way it is (on Spotrac)? ONLY guaranteed $ being accounted for in published valuation? Even in recent news, his 4-yr deal is reported to be under $6M. What the heck?
-
Hancock and Strong will both need to show value on STs, I suppose, to justify my weird confidence that they are both a real part of Buffalo's plans moving forward. Especially for Hancock if he's replacing Lewis (who was a reliable STs contributor). There is also a universe in which both Hancock AND Lewis make the team, with one focusing more on NCB and the other focusing more on S. That would mean Codrington does NOT make the team, I'd assume. The two suspended DL allow for extra bodies elsewhere during the first 6-7 weeks.
-
No way they franchise Cook IMHO. Unless they're super confident in finding a trading partner. To franchise James Cook, after he reluctantly soldiers through his contract year, would be to invite distraction and disruption. The comp pick value could very well be fair enough compensation without the headaches.
-
I see Dorian Strong as a relative lock, personally, barring injury or very unforeseen flop. Tre White I could even see agreeing to go to the PS to help the Bills secure a young prospect like Strong on the roster. But knowing that Alexander is unlikely to play for Buffalo in 2025, I'm thinking White simply replaces him in your depth chart and Strong beats out Ingram and Jackson. Hancock is also a lock, but as NCB, DB, or S?
-
Cook's relatively low mileage (in college and the pros) is a positive with respect to the RB age cliff, but also a potential negative with respect to his overall evaluation (why hasn't he had a larger snap % thus far in his career). The safest bet in my opinion is to help Cook go bonkers in this contract year, and allow him to move on with dignity. That seems like what Beane has in mind. Then Davis and Johnson and another rookie (or other low-risk acquisition) steps up. And so on and so forth.
-
Rodgers DOES seem to me like the perfect QB to maximize Metcalf, in that he throws elite slants, boundary fades, and back shoulders. Rodgers will wear out single coverage if he's got a legit "#1" he syncs up with. I don't know how much RPO Arthur Smith intends to implement, but that seems like one way to give Rodgers and Metcalf the stage to shine. (Also relies on a decent running game; stay tuned there.) Am I remembering correctly that Rodgers historically hates pre-snap motion? I'm curious how that aligns with his OC, and how ANY contemporary NFL OC could justify LESS pre-snap motion these days. I get that simplicity can allow a team to play freer and faster, but I believe you gotta try to give your guys some easy reads and manufactured advantages whenever possible. (Remember when Pittsburgh's last franchise QB eventually hated being under center and running play-action off of being under center, because he didn't like to turn his back to the D? How did that serve Pitt's offense down the back stretch of his career?)
-
Keon Coleman success by route - Not pretty
Richard Noggin replied to DJB's topic in The Stadium Wall
Liked this bit from Matt Parrino's recent report: Coleman seems like a guy who responds to/needs hard coaching. Humble and hungry. The social media physique police will appreciate Keon's hard work so far this offseason. Seems like the local pundits are also noticing some on-field growth this Spring. Let's hope it translates. -
Expectations for Javon Solomon
Richard Noggin replied to KentuckyBillsFan's topic in The Stadium Wall
Solomon might be better suited to see the field in an odd-front OLB role or more of a wide-9 alignment. The learning curve would be a lot flatter for him. Our system/coaches greatly prefer long, stout, 3-down types. Solomon IS actually super long-armed, but he obviously ain't tall for the position. -
I agree with the sentiment. Just wait for 2026. He'll get more snaps this year, provided he shows growth. And then in 2026 he'll be the returning workhouse sharing reps with a rookie and Johnson, most likely. The Bills are 100% better in 2025 with Cook as part of the team. You're not questioning that, are you?
-
The Bills are better with James Cook as part of the team, without question. He might not be worth $20M AAV, but he's worth what he's getting paid in 2025 for sure. So hopefully he does the smart thing and reports for camp eventually. Having another great season would get him closer to his dream of a massive payday. Simple math. Sucks that Hard Knocks has this pre-loaded contract drama to harp on relentlessly.
-
I actually assume there will be 4 "true" safeties rostered initially, with at least 1 of Lewis and Hancock serving as depth for both NCB and S. Could be a position that gets trimmed once Hoecht and Ogunjobi return, depending on injuries. The lack of an established depth chart might make a deeper room more appealing out of the gates.
-
For sure except that Hancock feels like a LOCK, to this poster at least. They seemed thrilled to land him when they did. He might not necessarily count towards the core-4 S depth chart, seeing as Lewis has traditionally been rostered in addition to 4 true safeties, right?
-
Tomlin might be too legit to be predictably, subversively undermined by some washed up coach killer. Or so I assume.
-
I find it odd I've never heard of pink cocaine before this. Turns out it's a total misnomer, and is actually closer to exactly what my first ID was: molly and other more "designer" synthetics. All news to me. The unhinged behavior in this case is Diggs letting anyone record and release anything unvetted. One imagines the attention is not entirely unwelcome, despite being negative. Builds upon his off-field legacy/persona.
-
I generally agree with all of this, and I have a special disdain for fans who gripe and complain while the Bills are winning (which sometimes involves grinding out narrow, chippy victories over inferior teams, and other times involves stealing a last second victory from the jaws of defeat). However, it's understandable that some passionate fans are fighting against the trap of "good being the enemy of great." As in, good isn't good enough. And ugly wins CAN raise red flags for that cohort of discerning Statler and Waldorfs.
-
Lulling us to sleep with his predictable offseason soft tissue injury...yeah, we're onto you, sir! **about to break out and prove the doubters wrong, or, maybe have an uneven campaign of inconsistent availability, or something in between ***The house is kinda: shipping container x nouveau riche x not a big reader, BUT...you know, it's definitely "better" than my house.
-
Anticipated changes in philosophy/scheme in 2025?
Richard Noggin replied to TFBillsfan's topic in The Stadium Wall
Von before injury was pretty awesome, and possibly gaining momentum. Probably not exactly a super star, though. Peak Milano has been absolutely elite at times, in the top 3 at his position. Super star though? No. But starting with when McDermott had a little 1:1 sideline "mound visit" with him in the New England MNF wind game, Milano has had multiple stretches of All-Pro play. Ed Oliver against Detroit in 2024 was bonkers. So...there was that.