dgrochester55

Didn't realize that he was a self proclaimed troll, good to know.

I can at least carry on a conversation with them. Even the doc (who I blocked because of his pedantic arrogance) is a real person with real opinions (wrong ones, but at least genuine). Section C3 has no actual political stance and is either a child or a lonely adult trolling for attention.

Unlike the other regular lefties, SectionC3 is clearly nothing more than a troll crying for attention. Every reply from them to me was nothing more than a paid troll cliche or childish insult that you would expect from a 12 year old. Since there is no chance at a productive conversation with them, I would advise blocking them like I just did.

Projection again. You bore me, welcome to my block list.

You can end the conversation anytime by admitting that you are trolling. There is a concept in jobs called vacation time. I take it during March Madness every year. The fact that you would default to not having a job as the reason why someone is posting on noon during a weekday is a projection on your part (BTW why are you posting now then?) Also, before you say "WHY U pOsT If U WaTcHiN GaMe?" I posted this from my mobile device while, maybe one day when you have your own job, you can get a device where you can do that to. I don't support J6, that is a weak assumption that only someone with an IQ under 90 or a fully brainwashed person would come to unless you are just trolling. At least the other far lefties like the doc and tibs have some substance and actually believe what they post, you are just a sad and bored little boy with no opinion of your own.

You are trying way too hard with your weak empty, played out cliches. The art of trolling is not making it so obvious. I am calling your bluff. You are trolling and this, is not your real opinion. Get a life. I'm watching some March Madness after this. Have a good day.

This is clearly a trolling effort on your part and a desperate cry for attention, but I'll bite in case you are serious. Listen sheep. drop the 01/06 card, that ship has sailed and as we speak TODAY, far left terrorists are destroying the very same Teslas that they insisted we buy two years ago. The rational 90 percent of society laughs as far left whack jobs like you because you are so out of touch with reality that it would be comical if it wasn't so destructive. Your opinion is wrong and you know it, so stop. You should be ashamed of yourself and embarrassed of your existence. End of conversation.

Lets minimize and dismiss hundreds of domestic terrorist incidents from the left over the course of five years because a bunch of cops and security managing a crowd corralled a few dozen protestors into the direction of the capitol building over four years ago. Get effed OP. Destroying people's expensive vehicles in 2025 because someone wants to cut a budget is not okay because a guy with a viking helmet had a photo op in the capital building in early 2021

Imagine buying a Tesla in 2023 because you were told that it was being a responsible "global citizen", then having it vandalized by the very same people less than two years later because the company owner is not conforming to the narrative like all of the other global elite? Never try to please extremists, what you do will never be enough for them. The far left reacts with terrorism whenever a controversial topic comes up every, single, time. Until the media stops their two-tiered coverage of domestic terrorism, and starts to take the far left versions of domestic terrorism seriously, this will continue.

So the narrative has gone from orange man bad to rich man bad, got it. Granted, I do not like the amount of power being given to Musk either, but the attacks and subsequent media coverage are so consistent with the extreme left. The two tiered coverage and prosecution of extreme terrorist acts needs to stop. Until the media covers attacks on Tesla vehicles and extreme Hamas university protests in the same way that they covered, 01/06, extremists on that side will feel more empowered to keep committing these acts.

I agree with you when it comes to setting expectations for signings of this caliber. However, one small difference between Shenault and those three is the proven return ability. If he makes the team, I see a similar role to Andre Roberts or Deonte Harty as a more likely scenario than a breakthrough like Patterson. It will probably come down to him or Codrington in one of the last spots due to their returning ability.

Can I shout "Run Forrest run!" if he gets a pick six?

I dont like a lot of Musk's overreach, but the left is showing their true colors with the attacks on Tesla. I don't seem to recall attacks on Meta, Starbucks and Microsoft like that from the right during Biden's regime.

A for the extensions C+ for the free agency signings. B overall. McDermott usually gets people later at a cheaper price, so I am not worried. Hoecht, and Palmer seem like good complementary players that add depth, but not ones that are likely to single handedly get Buffalo to the Super Bowl. Bosa's best days are likely behind him, but the 1 year and 12 million makes the signing a low risk, high upside option. The extensions are the most important. Keeping the key players intact makes the entire offseason process much easier. For that alone, I am happy so far.

I honestly rolled my eyes at first when I saw the headline on TV, but for 1 year and 12 million, that is not a bad risk to take. If he could get back to how he was a few years ago, he would be a great addition.

If you went back in time 20 years and told me that the Democrat party would be the ones who didn't care about a cancer survivor and only clapped when an endless war was mentioned, I would have never guessed it.

Honesty, think about what that looks like. Best case, Ukraine runs out of men and Russia takes more land. Worst case, the EU and US get involved and we are looking at WW3. Is that what you are willing to sacrifice? Even some of the regular lefty posters realize this. There has to be a path to peace.

I support the Ukraine over Russia because Putin was the aggressor. I support working towards ending the war and keeping the Ukraine a sovereign nation which is what yesterday was working towards. I think that all three acted poorly which I have mentioned in other posts and that they should find a way to get back to talks again. Zelensky has valid concerns about Russia holding up their end of the bargain and I think that Trump is underestimating Putin's track record of doing this. Other than that I agree with the general direction of the plan and think that it was wrong for Zelensky to try to change the conditions at the last second when the public meeting was assumed to be a formality before the signing. That method is poor form and etiquette no matter what a negotiation is for in the business or political world. Three years ago, some people thought that Russia could take over the Ukraine within a month and Europe within a year. Three years later, they are at a stalemate with an extremely depleted army, that is not a victory from their end.

I thought that only yes and no answers were allowed in this game. Why don't you want to answer? You can dish it out but you cannot take it. Also I never mentioned sending our troops, I asked if you support the deaths of hundreds of troops. In my question, I actually I meant Ukrainian ones, but you defaulted to US ones as if the Ukrainian ones didn't count. How ethnocentric of you. I thought that you supported Ukraine. Ask me your question in a neutral open-ended way instead of a leading agenda based one and I will acknowledge it. Until then, grow up.

Do you support the deaths of hundreds of troops a day? Yes or no. No waffling, no excuses. Answer that because it is a direct yes and no question that has no other possible explanation or context and everything is black and white. See how that works from the other side? Now grow up and talk like an adult if you want to be taken seriously.

Fixed it for you. Now ChatGPT, write a script calling the final drive of a Bills and Dolphins game playing the role of a TDS person if Musk bought the Dolphins.

Thanks for the CNN recap. Now what are your thoughts on it? Edit: I personally think that all three were in the wrong for different reasons, but your "thoughts" look like someone asked chat GPT to summarize yesterday events in the role of a person which a severe case of TDS.

I am not surprised by this. The Jets have never had an elite QB in the tier of Allen or Kelly, but they have had many QB's at the serviceable starter/slightly above average level until recently when they started the "draft a qb every three years who looks like a bust until they resurrect their career on another team" strategy. I remember many of the years without Kelly and Allen where the Jets sadly had the more stable QB situation.

Ukraine has already said that they will continue to fight to the end either way. Occupied countries always keep fighting and resisting. I actually agree with you when you say that Putin should be stood up to. I also think that peace talks were necessary to avoid a destructive stalemate for years. Russia's military is depleted and weakened while Ukraine has lost a high percentage of their male population, it is beneficial for both countries to stop the war and I think that both leaders realize this. Without the aid of the US and Europe, Ukraine would have been beaten by mid-2022. If they are able to stay as a nation after all of this, that is a huge loss for Russia who has up to this point had no resistance when going after old soviet and eastern bloc countries. I was on board with the process but yesterday was a disaster. Hopefully both of them can cool down and a deal can still be worked out. When it does, I am sure that Fox will call it the best deal ever while CNN calls it surrendering to Russia. I will look at it myself to see what I think when the time comes.

This was an obvious disaster. Granted, negotiations can get heated, but that is why it should not be live. Rather than follow fox and call Trump brilliant or follow CNN and call Zelensky a hero I will say that all of them acted wrong. Vance was wrong for interjecting when it was not has place and causing the escalated moments. Zelensky was wrong for trying to bait and switch the terms at the last second and play to the media. Trump was wrong for losing his temper like it was the opener of Monday night RAW and erupting like he was on the apprentice. Had he had more control and calmly said "it looks like we have more to discuss that we thought and that it would be better to finish this in private" and then excuse everyone, he would have looked like the better person, but that clearly did not happen. There are no winners here and it is a sad day.