Jump to content

dgrochester55

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,046
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dgrochester55

  1. Honestly, it is a conversation that many in the evangelical Christian community need to have. By default, I am for a church or other religious organization being tax exempt, but so many megachurches have exploited these loopholes and created mini empires that give their leaders millions. I am for the core portions of churches being exempt, but they need to set a tax exemption cap or make churches have the same financial transparency requirements as other non-profits. That is not "persecution", that is common sense and something that should be talked about more.
  2. The person who called you out is about as against Trump as anyone here and even they don't like what you did. I know that out of context half quotes goes hand in hand with TDS, but when one of your people call you out, maybe you should so quick to dismiss them. Cut the crap.
  3. Dude, finding one examples of a sob story does not mean that the other thousands of instances did not happen..
  4. Good point, now tell that to the terrorists creating pogroms at Ivy league universities over the past two years.
  5. Worst case scenario would be going back to the strategy of the drought era and trading up to reach for a player that they could have probably had equal value on if they waited. Regardless of what happens, we can all count on looking through the threads and posts over the draft weekend about how Buffalo will never get to the next level because they drafted an interior lineman in the 5th or 6th instead of that projected 2nd rounder at CB, WR or RB (that the poster usually never heard of until that day) who fell three rounds due to character or injury issues. Its a draft weekend rite of passage.
  6. If I have learned anything from the news between 2021-2024, the dow going up 2000 automatically means that the economy is better than ever. Right?
  7. This is not about Trump or the inconsistent values of some MAGA Evangelicals. Again, I only address the original topic which was roundy's love for violence against women? Deflections are for cowards and people with flimsy stances. Either address the original topic or there is nothing to discuss. It is as simple as that.
  8. Doubling down with lazy religious stereotypes, nice! So, since the original topic was not addressed by you, we agree that it was a deflection. Great, end of conversation.
  9. I do not go down irrelevant rabbit trails, lets discuss the original topic and address that. I made a comment about another poster sharing a tweet where someone thought a man slapping a woman was hilarious and that they should have done worse to her. You replied with cheap deflection using a weak lamea$$, played out comeback from eight years ago. Even for a TDS person, that was a poor effort. Just admit that it was a stupid deflection unless you want to admit that you also advocate violence against women. Now go back to blurring reality with your delusion and hunkering down for the US invasion (which 99 percent of us with common sense know will never happen) that you have let your media trick in into fearing and pass the time with TDS posts here while you wait.
  10. I think that the person who is the self admitted troll has no business calling anyone useless or idiotic.
  11. and today also is the one week anniversary of nutcases on the left destroying Tesla's and the less that one day anniversary of far left terrorists trapping and terrorizing people at Grand Central station in order to endorse Palestinian acts of terrorism and try to bring a little slice of home over here. Many milestones to celebrate. Absolutely agree, everything that you say is pointless.
  12. Looks like you grabbed the 2017 version of the TDS trolling script by accident. Try something more current like tariffs or defending the rights of ms-13 gang members to live in the US as undocumented freeloaders.
  13. I'm not surprised. One of our own lefties here thinks that videos of men slapping women for having an opposing viewpoint is a "funny meme."
  14. Over the past few days, you shared a post with someone calling people the r-word and then shared a post advocating men beating women. This is a disturbing pattern. That is not a projection, that is an observation. I will let others individually decide what they think of that.
  15. Nope, what you posted is what you advocate. You are fine with a man hitting a woman if the ends justify the means. Try to walk it back if you would like, but your true colors leaked out there.
  16. Sadly, now that I think about it, there is a possible chance these days that the assailant was also a woman. Since it was a far left protest, that makes the chances more likely than normal.
  17. Not surprised that a far lefty would resort to this violence. Thank you for reminding the rest of us how the left views free speech. For those on the center and right, lets thank Roundy for his transparency about his views on men hitting women and reminding us why the far left should never have absolute power. Note: The morbidly obese manchild pig who slapped her would fare about as well as Ned Beatty in deliverance if he ever tried to hit a man like that. You could tell that even the old guy speaking thought that what he did was out of line.
  18. Mainstream media step-by-step protest coverage strategy. Liberal protest: 1) Find the two dozen people scattered in a ten block radius. 2) Move them to an alley or other narrow area. 3) Get a "candid" shot of them all crowded together screaming at the top of their lungs. 4) Include that photo and a stock photo with a crowd of thousands in the article 5) Create a headline "Thousands peacefully protest all over nation for XXXXXX" Conservative protest 1) Locate the crowd of hundreds peacefully protesting. 2) Drive around a few blocks until you see the one guy with a confederate flag and take a photo of them alone 3) Find the few lefty counter protesters acting violent, take a photo and also label them as far right extremists 4) Create a headline "Policy is loved by most, but a few extremists terrorize city and threaten residents" 5) Reference 01/06 in the article and make it at least half of the content
  19. It doesn't depend on anything. Either way, you will make 237 posts tomorrow on how much you hate Trump because that is your primary passion and interest in life. It is all that you have and if he was to be gone tomorrow, you would probably freeze in fear at your desk and have a severe panic attack because you would be thrown off by the sudden giant void in your life.
  20. What a horsecrap, drama mongering, gossip girl post. You've just spent 120 hours straight with no sleep whining about the tariffs and now he is a coward for considering the adjustment based on the drop. The difference between you and your merry band of trolls and others expressing valid concerns is that you would have been making just as many complaining posts in that stretch of time if the market had gone up ten percent last week. If the dow went up 3000 pts tomorrow, you would still find something to b@tch about.
  21. It's funny because these are the same people that dismissed inflation and cost issues for three years telling us that it was a conspiracy theory and that the complainers were all losers who needed to learn how to manage their money better and get a real job. People on the right shouldn't fall into the same pattern. A large dip in retirement and savings balances is a fully valid concern and deserves empathy, especially when we are all seeing it. Some of us have faith that it will recover fast, others don't but lets not fall into the same trap as they did under Biden.
  22. I don't like a lot about these changes either, but some of you all have been creating threads and panic posts for ten days straight at all hours. Are you all even sleeping at any point? Not healthy. Even if you are 100% against the tariffs, that is no way to live life.
×
×
  • Create New...