transplantbillsfan

You must be a blast a parties

After listening to Joe Brady speak. If our offense looks improved: YES!!!!

Yep!! I've only gotten through less than 2 minutes of Joe Brady talking than Dorsey, but I already like him better. My bias I guess as an English teacher, but just so much more confident as a public speaker. I know Dorsey was super football smart, but his PCs were painful.

I've only gotten through less than 2 minutes of Joe Brady talking than Dorsey, but I already like him better. My bias I guess as an English teacher, but just so much more confident as a public speaker. I know Dorsey was super football smart, but his PCs were painful.

Last I checked the QB coach doesn't call the offensive plays... this f'in place....

Like posting on a message board of a team you stopped watching so you can spend time with your family?

Awesome tweet and exactly the point I was just trying to make. Other than that really weird play that Allen keeps throwing interceptions on, he's been soooOOOOOOOOooooo much better at ball security.

This is a pretty dominant topic in terms of Josh Allen for years now. The funny thing is, outside of that one play that Josh Allen has thrown 4 interceptions on this year, Allen's turnover worthy plays are actually incredibly low. And as for that one play... I hope sending Dorsey packing gets that play out of our playbook... or at least sets up Brady to mix in some trickery designed around that specific play.

2 days with no one bumping this thread. Leave it to you to be the one to bump it with your need to win the Internet.

Is this actually the Yolo we all know from (what now seems like) way back when?

It's not logical to you only because of his lack of tangible offensive production. Knox was on the field more than Kincaid was when he was healthy and during that stint that Knox was there and healthy, the offense was its most productive. It's not everything. But it's not nothing.

straw man... I can play the logical fallacy game, too Let me know if you actually want to talk about it.

It kinda did, though... at least while Knox was healthy.

another tackle isn't a receiving threat. Part of the reason 12 personnel is theoretically so successful for the passing game is because when you have 2 TEs in the lineup, you're in traditional run formations and the D has to make a choice to either play the run with a traditional 3 LB setup or go into a nickel formation, putting a mismatched smaller DB on either Knox or Kincaid. That was kinda the whole idea of what this offense was moving towards in terms of philosophy for this season. It was working while Knox was on the field and healthy, regardless of what his actual numbers were. Call him a decoy if you want. Another tackle would not be a decoy. And you can't really substitute any other TE we have on the roster for Knox because they aren't the dual (blocker & receiver) threat that he is.

When did you come back? You just wanted to come back for the tire fire? With the way this NFL season has been going it's really stupid for anyone to dismiss the idea of any team beating any other NFL team. Here's the Billsy thing that'll happen, though. Bills beat the Jets, shock the Eagles, beat the Chiefs coming off the by, beat the Cowboys at home. Fanbase back in it and riding high... and... we lose the last 3 against the Chargers, Patriots and Dolphins. Out of playoffs and drafting in the mid teens flashing back to the drought years.

Knox injured his wrist against the Jags. He played 2 more games before going on IR, but admitted he was basically a shell of himself. 3 games since. The entire offseason this offense practiced 12 personnel as our primary offense and it sure looked good weeks 2-4. I keep going back to a podcast by Joe Marino of Locked On Bills sometime over the last few months (can't remember when) about the common misconception about 11 vs. 12 personnel. It boils down to the fact that teams are actually much more successful passing the ball from 12 and much more successful running from 11. Maybe someone can remember the episode and post it, but it made perfect sense even though it's the opposite of many would think. So with Knox out at least 1 (?) more game, is he really the cog the offense is missing? He's also Josh Allen's BFF... might be another component.

Why is it that Dorsey coaches an offense that's so freaking predictable??? Josh Allen has thrown nearly the exact same interception 3 weeks in a row. While that's inexcusable for Allen, it's also obvious that teams keep seeing that play on film and know exactly when it's going to happen. And then of course there's the absence of any motion or creativity in the backfield. Allen even seems almost scared to run it at times that he used to just take off. I think we might need to hope Daboll doesn't get what he asks for in NY and he comes back to Buffalo. He'll not only bring some creativity back, but maybe he can also rein Josh in again in terms of his turnovers.

Good solution to keep bumping it so it stays on page 1.

You sure? Cook couldn't hold onto the football

Players were culpable for this loss. McDermott shouldn't be throwing anyone under the bus in his PC, but Allen was 100% responsible for 2 turnovers, Gabe Davis was 100% responsible for 1 turnover and James Cook was 100% responsible for 1 turnover. I guess I take the above back... Dorsey holds some responsibility for Allen’s 2nd interception. That's 3 games in a row that play has resulted in an interception. Predictable much? Regardless, I would also say it's on Bernard (he was the one in the back for the FG, right) to count the men on the line to make sure there weren't 12. But aside from that last missed then made field goal, the Bills had no business really even being in this game with all those turnovers on offense and crazy lopsided field position battle we lost.

Looks bleak right now

Who were our PS call ups?