teef

i honestly still think the best wings i've had were at an airport in st. louis. they were fantastic. as long as the wings aren't chewy, i'm a fan. we only use ours as a mini convection oven, and almost never add any extra oil. we make things like tater tots and chicken fingers in it. it is easier, faster, and better than a traditional convection oven, but i have zero interest in doing wings in them. that being said, there was a thread where a number of members on here nailed an air fryer wing recipe.

let's see. 17/28 225 yrds. 2 tds, 2 ints. 4 sacks seem appropriate.

i feel like he's setting himself up for failure here.

Because I remember this poster from the bbmb. He loves the misery. If the bills are doing well, he’s literally no where to be found. Once the season hits a bump, he’s on here crying from the highest mountain top. Not discussing, just complaining. There’s always a group like that. There’s nothing odd about it.

And it makes you so happy for some reason.

I’m pretty sure this is how a lot of Disney movies begin.

The bitches that comes after cakewalk is one of the highest honors a man can have placed upon him.

something big is going to come from this! the creeper eddie picture is amazing.

that's reasonable.

why does ranch go so well with chicken fingers, but not wings. have you ever thought of that? !@#$ing have you?!

looks like you can't unring that bell! right guys?! right?!

i think it's pretty obvious that it's sexual.

i can honestly say the only times i've done hard drugs is after drinking. i just seem to think it's a good idea at that point. it's not.

just wondering. i went to a jesuit high school, so i had a lot of family and friends go to a jesuit college. lots of john carroll, loyola of chicago, canisus, etc guys.

!@#$ing cake walk.

words.

just a ton of man candy.

seriously. that got me by for years. once they finally found out my true intentions...too late! they already have my stank on them.

there's definitely better options. they must like peterman to some degree obviously since they picked him. could be a situation where he's cheap, and they already spent capital on him, so why not give him a go. i'm not confident in nate either, but i don't know how much difference an off the street vet would make. i think that's exactly what's going on as well.

Or mcd is just a coach who wants to give his rookie an more time to come along. If that’s the approach, why not let your other young qb get some development time. Maybe he becomes a great back up.

You were called out for having a look at me screen name and avatar, and this is now your approach? Nicely done.

oh cool. where did you go?

did you not bring up education first? you really are child like.

why? you brought up the education thing first for some reason. if you don't want to discuss it here, don't bring it up.

shhhh. you're tired and a bit over stimulated. why don't you sit quietly for a bit and have some you time. also, if alabama is irrelevant to this topic, why bring up a jesuit education? isn't that also irrelevant to the topic too? do you see why people don't take you seriously?