Jump to content

JohnBonhamRocks

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,531
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JohnBonhamRocks

  1. Yay for Clay! Probably won't matter. I know a lot of people think our WR group is a disaster, but I really think we're just missing a WR2. We have a solid WR1 and plenty of WR3-5s.
  2. If this were a situation where OBD's plan was to roll with McCarron and use the draft to fill in the roster around him, then yeah, I think they would have a good shot at being a playoff team. Basically, hondo's point about draft capital, above. With 12, 22, 53, 56, and 65, we could easily add starters at WR, OL, DT, and LB.
  3. More injury question marks than Darnold and Allen is my guess.
  4. Heard that on my commute. He said it makes the Bills a possible trade partner because the Broncos would be well served to move back and take him.
  5. I would put this information out if I wanted teams to think my team was not using Watson in the same way that made him successful. I'm sure they'll add some things, but also that they aren't going to stop calling plays to his strengths.
  6. He did catch 10 balls for 78 yards this year...
  7. That's more of the knock that's been reported about Rosen. All that I have heard is that Mayfield's teammates would go to battle for him because he was so well liked. As far as stupid things on the field, I (and I feel like many others) would be pretty okay with Mayfield scoring a TD to put us up by 25 on the Patriots and grabbing his crotch towards them.
  8. Agree with those who say they only support trading for Beckham if we still do what we need to do to get one of the Big 3 (for me, that's Darnold, Rosen, Mayfield).
  9. Maybe too much coffee or something? Not trying to put too much work on Virgil's plate. He did a great job with this draft. Just a suggestion that I thought bridged the gap between trades galore and no trades.
  10. I think a lot of people are saying he doesn't trust the process. Maybe. But to me, being a little bit of a headcase/diva/what-have-you is not determinative of whether or not a given player trusts the process. I think it has more to do with whether or not that player is willing to buy in, be a professional, and put in the work. My point is that, while less likely, I think it is still possible that a player can have off-the-field issues, but still be considered process-worthy because they show their willingness to put in the work. See, Zay Jones. Not sure if that is Beckham or not, but a guy who wants to be the best WR in the game must put in some decent work.
  11. Agreed. I do think that, if OBD views him as a top WR in the league even with his issues, then adding him to help out a rookie QB is akin to about the best pair or training wheels you can get.
  12. Not saying I'm for it. But... Let's say 22 and 65 gets it done. Can still use 12, 53, 56, 96, and/or 2019 first to move up and grab your QB.
  13. Nah, my tarot cards told me I'm gonna win the bet. Great username btw.
  14. You put up your crystal ball. I'll put up my tarot cards. Deal?
  15. Looks like if the Redskins' logo became a Simpsons character.
  16. Baker's Berry Bran? (A Brandon Beane Brand Box.)
  17. Suggestion: keep trades, but have a committee of posters who are not owners who have to vote to approve or disapprove based on whether or not it sounds at all realistic. Did not participate, but it was fun to keep tabs on it!
  18. By that, do you mean you think OBD has a good shot at trading up into the top 5?
  19. Get your crystal ball from Amazon or...?
  20. Oh man, I saw "trade", "Broncos", and "5th . . . pick" ... got a little excited for a second.
×
×
  • Create New...