Jump to content

GoBills808

Community Member
  • Posts

    16,832
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GoBills808

  1. Still waiting for you though
  2. Blue on white is best kit in the league
  3. No. You're just saying things that have nothing to do with what we were discussing. My contention is that defense has nothing to do with QB development. Short field, long field, up by 50, down by 3, doesn't matter...there's no correlation between how good your QB turns out and the quality of your defense early in his career.
  4. Your contention is that short fields and playing with a lead is conducive to quarterback development?
  5. There's no way you can read through what I posted and come to that conclusion honestly. Are you under the impression that I was the one that brought those QBs into the discussion? To reiterate because it seems you missed my point: those quarterbacks would have been eventually been great regardless of the quality of their teams' defenses early in their careers. A team's defense has little to no influence on how its quarterback develops.
  6. IMO make my point w/ the Wilson example. He blossomed into a top QB when that defense took a step back. Brady, Brees, Roethlisberger...there’s not much correlation between their performance and the relative quality of their defenses over time. If you want to talk about QB job security vis a vis Allen/Rosen and how that’s impacted by a good defense, I’d probably agree but that’s a different conversation.
  7. It’s a 4/10 if we’re being honest
  8. The TEAM benefits from a good defense. QB abilities and performance are completely unrelated to defensive quality.
  9. It give a QB more opportunities to put up statistics, which is what I said. It’s not necessarily a benefit, so I didn’t say that. You, however, tried to make the point that a good defense DOES benefit QB play, which is tenuous and unsupported by the evidence.
  10. You realize a QB has more opportunities to put up stats (or showcase abilities) when they have a bad defense, not fewer, as offenses are statistically more likely to run the ball when the game is close or they're ahead.
  11. I don't think I'm a loser and I would be happy w a division title and a playoff win
  12. Prepare to most likely be disappointed then
  13. A guy that drops as many passes as Knox doesn't deserve to take his spot for granted
  14. It's almost as if it's unlikely Tyrod Taylor puts up 34 pts against one of the league's best defenses. Oh and us only scoring 6 against a defense missing its best player.
  15. Bucs. Roster is stacked.
  16. Don't sleep on the Rams
  17. I would be outright shocked if Milano’s deal is more than $10M per season. That’s a great contract for a 4-3 WILL.
  18. Never heard anyone call a Corolla a truck before
  19. Congrats 27 earned every nickel and probably more tbh
  20. I think about eight or nine fewer than Watson
  21. You said Watson was covering up an otherwise weak team. I pointed to two generational talents who are also on the Texans as examples of why they might not be as weak as you claim. Then out of nowhere you say let's put Josh Rosen on the Texans and call my take confusing.
×
×
  • Create New...