GoBills808

They want him to clean up the turnovers lol while still being 50% of the rushing attack plus throwing for 35+ TDs and 4500 yards no big deal

Exactly RB gets hit every single play, it's a brutal position

Most 4th quarter comebacks in the league since 2015

i have a shirt that says play bad fast lol

The idea that some people should settle for earning less because they make more than you is such a narrow way of looking at it

love golf i dont play often enough but im always out back hitting balls into the pasture 15handicap never walk great game wish i had taken it up sooner

Jones

+115 that's actually what's going on in his head when he runs too

Dareus and his captain's hat

Similarly Southern California freeways in my experience If you're doing 80 in the slow lane people are mad but everyone follows the rules, just at warp speed

Not a strawman. It's an example of exactly what I'm talking about. The Rams decided that winning a Super Bowl was more important than being competitive every year...which means the two can (obviously) stand in opposition. The bolded is, tho. Nobody said Allen has a problem w Beane's way.

This is not even debatable tbh If you can't see how the Rams Super Bowl was in opposition to being competitive every year I don't know what to say

Yes I think cleaning up redzone issues whatever they may be makes the offense league best hands down

So I can see the two goals in opposition, that's why I referenced Allen. I understand they're not mutually exclusive necessarily but I also don't think they're automatically aligned.

Allen says the goal is to win the Super Bowl at almost every opportunity

I guess I just don't agree that they struggled anywhere outside the red zone specifically and even there it wasn't really terrible just around average

Red zone efficiency is an area w room for improvement but overall they really did not have an issue moving the ball relative to league average and were in fact very good

What evidence of this do you have

So I have no problem quoting you😂😂just to clarify- comp% is not the QB statistic most correlated to winning, that would be ANY/A looking at historical data and NY/A for predictive (future) purposes Explained here, data is old but he has newer stuff that makes similar findings https://www.footballperspective.com/correlating-passing-stats-with-wins/

His numbers there were incorrect just fyi

well what tf else are we supposed to talk about then

I am generally opposed to red helmets but this looks good imo

Overall yes but redzone efficiency there's some meat left on the bone Stylistically yes...all things considered slower games/longer drives will favor the other team as they tend to keep the game closer

The missing info is the quality of the pass catchers I think... obviously if you have a back comfortable catching passes and productive in YAC targeting him at a higher rate would make sense My guess in increasing specifically the Bills' rate of targeting RB would be more in service of system-specific results...keeping a back in on pass downs to leak out for check down occupies a LB or safety, setting up wheel motion to disguise something, etc I don't think there's any real need to get the ball in the hands of RBs near the LOS otherwise, esp in our offense

Pretty sure Tannehill's cap hit is like 2x Allen's for 2023