longtimebillsfan

That is one game closer to the end of Peterman's career.

Again, we are doomed. All is lost.....

Ok. So I guess we are doomed.

Yes it was. It was needed to open up opportunities to obtain better players next year. The Bills will have one of the best financial situations going into the off season. This depressing season is one we just have work through. It is hard to fairly evaluate coaching performances on the offensive side of the ball with such a lack of talent.

It may if we shore up the offensive line. Get better receivers and drop Peterman. Keep in mind that this management team had severe financial restrictions placed on them, so they were limited on who they could sign.

You can't keep changing the head coach or gm every two or three years. Every week we have this over reaction. This year will be hard to deal with, but hopefully it will pay dividends in the years to come. Keep in mind a handful of geniuses on this board called for the head of Tyrod because he wasn't winning games the "right way" by not throwing for 300 yards. If we had his skill set of mobility and ball protection this year, we may have 5 wins.

Peterman will be with the Bills all season. I can't see McDermott cutting Peterman during the season. I would like to see it, but I don't think it will happen until seasons end.

Lol.

I would sign Bradford just for insurance. He would not last long as a starter with the beating he would get playing behind or O line.

I hope you are correct. This would be the best scenario. Anderson would have more time to learn the play book and get his timing down with the receivers. Allen will hopefully be ready to go . I am in in that.

Sorry. I disagree. They are in two different situations. Which coach took their team to the playoffs? I am still optimistic about McDermott future.

Dare to dream ....

Too far off = cautiously optimistic.

I am really surprised with the results of this poll. I appreciate the incredible locality of Bills fans. Go Bills!

That sounds about right.

We are smarter than they are? No... that can't be it.

I saw that as well. I believe it was just speculation.

I thought Matt Moore or Mark Sanchez. Yes, they are not great, but are they an upgrade from what we have now. I believe so.

Peterman has earned his reputation. Most if not all of his picks we throwing errors, not balls going off the receivers hands. We have seen bad quarterback play this year. Nate leads the pack in that category.

Sad but true.

You are right. It is the Nate Peterman era. He will lead us to where we want to go. I didn't say he started against the Colts, but he finished the game in more ways than one. If you are a Peterman. Great. But why are you so angry?

Sports in our you was magical. Those were good times.

It should have been over after two weeks ago when he gave up the game to the Colts. All we can do is be huge Peterman fans on Sunday, then hold the door after the game and wish nate all the best in his new business career selling Amway. Once all our qb 's are back, there is no reason to keep Nate Pick 6, Peterman.

YES. I forgot about the wild pants. It was the 70's though.

Seriously, with the ask up qb mess, a questionable offensive line, and weak receiving corp, it was obvious that we would struggle to score points. Having Allen go down with an injury for an extended period of time made it worse. At least with Allen playing, we were accomplishing something. Did I expect them to be historically bad? I never thought about that.