HamSandwhich

Darnold please?

Yes ignore all republicans when we will have a republican majority in the senate (runoffs are shoe in for republicans in GA) and then do executive orders which will be challenged in court. We’ll see how the Dems like it when every one of their moves are halted by some judge somewhere and challenged until it reaches the Supreme Court and dies. Have fun!

The mental gymnastics you make are impressive, I’ll give you that. It’s overtly obvious the liberal bias to the media at large. This is not controversial at all.

Yes, keep spelling it that way, you sound smart!

He’s not great at explaining his position, it’s never as bad as the media characterizes but, though they know what he means, they always take the bad faith idea of what he says and run with it. Repeat over and over that he said to stop the vote counting (means to stay illegal ballot counting) until the narrative is the truth in people’s mind, then cut off his clarifying statements from your news channels. Same thing happened with “very fine people on both sides”. I’ll bet there is still a majority who believes he was saying this about white supremicists, even though he says in the same interview “not white supremicists, not kkk, they should be condemned completely”. Just repeat a version that makes him look as racist as possible and run with it. Media...induced...Orangeman...hysteria! Original

And anyone with half a brain!

Media driven Trump hate

Sounds good

So you agree a socialist country is bad then? You agree a socialist country must close the borders to its most productive peoples and keep them from leaving, to keep from brain drain of the country? That, in and of itself, is morally reprehensible but a necessary feature of socialism. Berlin Wall is a perfect example. 100% agree

He needed adversity in the form of heavy rain...cmon D!

Awww man, Milano! We needed you!

I’ll believe Texas is blue when I see it. We can agree with socio-economic issues as long as you’re not trying to make it a race baiting issue. I will never agree with a socialist/communist approach to it. Did you even see the video one of your so called “right wingers” posted about their dislike of all government, including his hatred of Dems and republicans? He was not right wing, he was all anarchy. BLM and Antifa are left wing antagonists and they do cause harm to others. BLM is going into neighborhoods, what is the next step. There will be escalations if we don’t stop it. Burning down buildings, shooting others point blank to protect their friends of color from a non-imminent threat is dangerous. Political violence is dangerous no matter what side. It’s coming from the left predominantly but anytime there is violence, the Dems and media want to do a slight of hand and say it’s right wing. It’s so easy to see through.

Didn’t you want to do away with the electoral college? That’s a stalwart of the Democratic Republic. I’m not so sure you’re for the republic, you’re more for the burn it to the ground anarchist/BLM/Antifa sorts. What does this social justice movement want? Again, specifics, you were not specific in your original response.

What are you fighting? Specifically please. Not just the amorphous “systemic racism”. What is the end goal?

Wars are mostly peaceful. What’s your point?

No brainer

Well, that’s where you’re wrong. It is precisely the left that has diluted the meaning. Everything is seen as “white supremacy” that can be deemed as an action that can, even tangentially, benefit a white person. I think it should be exactly the meaning you think it is, but it’s not.

Well, good, you’re showing your inability to have a coherent and cogent argument.

I don’t see anything with the “proud boys” where they think they are better than anyone. You may think that people mean what you do as the “well-accepted” meaning, but you would be very wrong. Simply being proud of who you are and being white is reason to be called a WS to most who espouse this BS.

He didn’t do that, what are you even talking about? He didn’t tell any group to go watch the polling. I think there is some projecting happening here on your part (from which you probably got from the liberal media). Let me guess, you think what he said was a ”dog whistle” to the proud boy’s to cause mayhem and intimidate the voters? Sounds like you.

What is white supremacy to you?

So you’re saying poll watchers are scumbags? He didn’t call for antifa to poll watch, you’d be right then.

He got Biden going didn’t he? Biden called him a clown and Biden said oooops sorry. He forgot where he was for a moment.

He was trying to clarify what he meant by “white supremacy” as it means nothing like what it used to anymore. Just being proud while white is considered white supremacy. That’s why he asked Chris to name what he meant. He told the Proud Boys, who Chris names, to “stand down” like Chris asked. He then went on the offensive with Joe. It made it seem like it was a passing statement, but he said it. My theory is that he wanted to move on to the next thought before he lost his train or thought he had so he quickly got his answer out of the way and turned the tables. I find myself trying to jump to the next thing like that at times, trying to capitalize on a thought that I think is profound while giving a cursory response to the question my interlocutor has posed. Not something I’m proud of and something I actively try to avoid, but it happens. I think others can identify but I don’t know if many will admit it.

They can represent me any day of the week! Squish those fish!!!