BillsFan130

Fair enough sir. We shall see. I actually hope you’re right. I prefer defence over offence

I actually dislike high scoring games. I preferred last nights game over the chiefs rams game. So please don’t tell me what I like and don’t like. The FACT is in 2018 an elite offence is way more valuable than an elite defence. Don’t believe me? Look at the top 4 teams in the league right now. If you want to bet the field against those 4 teams (Rams , Chiefs, Saints, Pats) you will most likely lose your money. If you are going back 30 years to determine that defence is more important than offence, I really don’t know what to tell you. 1988 football to 2018 football is night and day.

Let’s say they are basically the same as they are now. Saints are still a high scoring machine and Dallas has the same mediocre offence and great defence. Who wins that game in New Orleans in your opinion?

Nope you’re right it definitely doesn’t only matter. But I will say an elite offence is way more important than an elite defence in 2018 NFL.

All true Alpha. But.... Would you really bet the field against Saints, Rams, Pats, or Chiefs winning the Super Bowl this year? (All high powering offences) One of those teams IMO are winning this year. I would be shocked if they didn’t and I would declare you right on this argument if one of those high powering offences didn’t win lol

For sure, there can be an upset. But I’m betting NO all day if there is that playoff matchup

Ok. So in your opinion, are the Cowboys going to go on the road in the playoffs and beat New Orleans in New Orleans?

I also think its worth noting: Cowboys I believe have a top 3 defence, maybe even top 2 and they are 7-5 on the season. Saints I believe have a top 2 offence, maybe even first, and they are 10-2 on the season. The game was also played In Dallas on a short week. Taking nothing away from Dallas as they fully deserved to win. But If these two teams were to play again in the playoffs in which the game would be in New Orleans, I would bet the Saints would handle them easily.

Defence still matters. But if I were to bet right now, a high scoring offence wins the super bowl this year in a shootout. Saints, Rams, Chiefs, Pats, or Steelers. If Chiefs or Pats and/or Rams or Saints make it, which there is a descent chance that can happen, it isn't going to be 13-10 in the superbowl lol

I see your point but still a bit early. Edmunds has at least been descent In his rookie season where Zay was a disaster. And I believe Edmunds has lots of room to grow.

Not saying you’re wrong and your argument is completely valid. I just personally wouldn’t do it as I value first round picks very highly. And for the Green argument, just too risky for me with his age creeping up and all the injuries he had.

I see what you’re saying. But the Bills are not serious contenders next year. If everything goes right then 2020. Which leaves AJ Green 32 years old with a long list of injuries? No thanks. Stick to the course by building through the draft and adding via free agency. At least that’s what I would do

Not saying you’re wrong, just wouldn’t do it if I were Beane. They aren’t good enough yet to be trading high draft picks for a player with maybe only a couple good years left. If they were a super bowl contender then it could make sense.

Looked like a catch. Also looks like there was helmet to helmet contact

Lol such a joke. Sums up how ignorant ESPN is

Ya sounds about right Ya makes sense

Ya I know. He played a very good game. Not sure what the writer meant when he said “All his negatives were on display”. Doesn’t make sense to me

All his negatives? I didn’t read the article but I wonder what he was referring too. A few throws he wanted back im sure, but overall I thought he played a very solid game

Is Parker playing Sunday? I know he’s always off and on with injuries. I would guess Tre would get Parker if he plays but if not, then he will probably get Stills

Green is either 30 or turning 30 next year. Giving a first rounder for an injury prone older receiver seems like a very steep and risky price to pay ?

OBJ nothing. Wouldn’t want that hesdcase with a huge contract on my team. Green I’m not sure of his contract details. If they are team friendly, then I would give up a bit not too much. He is approaching 30

I would be on board with that.

I wouldn’t count on it

Lol the Colts have to get to the playoffs first. And then win a wild card game on the road just to play in Arrowhead assuming KC gets a bye

Yep. Even Todd Gurley. Averaged 3.2 per carry a few years ago with under 1000 yards. Rams re build their o line (as well as the brilliance of McVay) and boom. Suddenly he’s a superstar and a potential MVP candidate.