unbillievable

Meanwhile, Albuquerque is just as blue as ever. No wonder this city is best known for Breaking Bad, and Cops.

Meanwhile, 44% of Minneapolis voted to replace the Police. That is just crazy.

The tipping point for capitalists is when private citizens start their own space programs, while the tipping point for socialists is when money starts becoming worthless. How is it possible that we're hitting both at the same time?

Have to wait for the 1am ballots they have stuffed in the backroom to be counted before calling it.

Doubt we'll get any more information than what has already been released. The philosophical questions of just how bad this is will be argued between lawyers from now on. The rest of us will just have to wrestle with our own scale of criminality on this one. Personally, I have no perspective since I've been lucky enough not to know anyone who has experienced either side of this tragedy, so my first reaction was football related...

Will the Raiders release him or is he going to be in limbo like Deshaun Watson? His trial might not be until next year. Realistically speaking, he'll be a Patriot, Chief, or Cowboy in 2024.

They want to distract the fans away from the Ruggs fiasco.

They were also enforcing the 6ft distancing rule, and the line went around the school for me. seemed long but only took 20mins. Albuquerque. ID's are state and city law required. I asked and they said it's because people can still cast a provisional ballot.

I was surprised to see a NO ID REQUIRED sign out front, even though it's required by law.

Some confusion with the mask mandate because it is required in schools, and a lot of voting stations are held in schools.

For the traditional crowd who wants decisions made on gut instinct, we'll always have referees for that!

I also feel that field goal points should increase every 10 yards. under 20 = 1 point 30yds = 2points 40yds = 3points 50yds = 4 points 60yds = 5 points This would come with the option for teams to move the line of scrimmage back, so they can increase their point try. Although, this might screw up TDs, since some teams have good enough kickers that hitting 50yards would be easier. So maybe eliminate 30yd and 50yd distances.

Since they moved back the XP, it actually makes more sense to go for 2 every time, going by league Average. I think the math is something like If you went for it 300 times, you would get a +1 differential vs doing just XP. Also, it affords the team real game time practice in goal-line situations. However, situationaly, each team should analyze their kicker (Bills have a good one), the opposing defense, and their offense' red zone efficiency (Bills have a bad avg). So Buffalo shouldn't doing it that often. Additionally, they should stop kicking XP when the game gets out of hand. It's similar to what happened in the NBA with 3point shooters.

Harris will take over for Biden sometime next year and they will call everyone racist and sexist before cheating her into the White House in 2024. The House will flip Republican forcing the government to grind to a halt, which will help keep inflation down allowing the country to fix itself with less government intrusion.

The polls just tell us how much the Democrats will cheat.

What if the NFL was like professional wrestling and all 2,000 players are in on it?

They tried that in the preseason and it didn't work out.

I was thinking more like Kurt Warner.

Increasing Taxes prevented all those disasters from happening. 🤑

Too soon to tell. He might get caught in a massage parlor situation.

With 1 minute left to play, did the Dolphins kneel down to end the game?

They should have tried an onside kick. No one would be expecting that.

We can't read your mind, which is why we read what you wrote. We responded to that. We also understand that your mistake was that you didn't write what you really meant to say. "...but regardless (or irregardless) of contract it still not worth it imo." The above statement is so blatantly wrong, that an explanation was required from you to explain your reasoning. It boggled the mind that in response, your only caveat was to change "regardless" to "irregardless"; A grammar correction. To make matters worse, when pressed further, you try to clarify what you really meant, got butthurt over it, then acted snarky by demanding an apology because we were "wrong" in correctly interpreting what you incorrectly wrote down the first time. "...you didn't really mean regardless" (or irregardless) Basically, your excuse is that you know what you meant to say, and that you were correct in your own head, so we have to admit we were wrong, because we can't read your mind. That is insane. All because you refuse to admit you are wrong, despite insisting it is something you routinely admit to. Is my re-up of the thread silly?

Definitely need to keep on eye out for crazy.

It's pretty much a consensus that you didn't mean what you wrote. we get it. It was a grammar mistake. If you do it all the time then it should be easy to admit now. Especially since you've already gone the "technically this is what I really meant" excuse route.