Jauronimo

Not exactly. 30.4% of people who listed the Bills in their top 3 also had Pats in the top 3 hated. This data might include a Cardinals fan who's third favorite is Buffalo because their aunt is from Buffalo and their least favorite teams are Seattle, San Fran, and the Rams. I think its a pretty safe bet that anybody claiming Bills as their #1 favorite has New England in their top 3 most hated.

I would love to look through the source data for the poll and see which fan bases hate the Bills. I gotta believe that if we look at the data for people who selected the Bills as #1 most loved team, its like 75% hatred for New England in the 1 spot and 25% spread between Phins and Jets for the 2 and 3 spot. .

I don't think its the end of their dominance. Even if the passing game struggles to be as efficient I expect they will win a lot of close ones in strange fashion and then make the adjustments to hit the playoffs clicking on all cylinders. It might not be as pretty as previous years though.

The Pats offense took a big hit a few years ago when Edelman missed an extended stretch of games. Edelman is the guy Brady trusts most on that offense. Hes a high volume pass catcher and PPR stud. Whenever the Pats need to convert on 3rd, you can pretty much guarantee Brady is looking for Edelman.

Tell me again how Edelman won't be missed because Pats offense is plug and play.

No, that's still funny. You probably don't get the humor. Peter Pan guy is like the show Frasier or Dennis Miller.

I never found the appeal. I thought it was sophomoric at best. Personally, I wouldn't want to be associated with such low brow attempts at humor but some here just can't help themselves.

I too am shocked an appalled at the lack of respect St. Nick gets around here. I think this topic deserves three threads.

If this place were to be shutdown, god forbid, I would band together with the lowest common denominator of TBD and we would go find another Bills site and spam them to high hell with as many terrible new threads as we could muster. And when everybody inevitably calls us on our idiocy, I would be all like "whatever, dude. You should get a life or something cause I don't care about nothing man!" until I was banned. And then rinse, wash, repeat as necessary.

It wasn't a phenomenal performance, but I saw Tyrod do some nice things yesterday. There was one throw to Clay which was the definition of anticipatory. He threw the ball before Clay made his break to the area Clay would be moments later. Great completion over the middle. I saw him step up in the pocket at least once. I saw him use the middle of the field and hit receivers on target setting up for yards after the catch. Only once or twice did I scream "throw the f@#$ing football!" at the television.

And miss out on your next epiphany, subsequent bludgeoning by the board, followed by your passionate defense of your stillborn baby??? Never.

Yet you come here and start a new thread to discuss any fleeting interaction you had with another fan or anytime the synapses start firing and you have a partial thought.

Are you also sick of people calling Brad Smiff a dummy?

I have Gilly in three fantasy leagues and I'm concerned. 3 TDs was great, but he came up short on two 4th downs. The second time he came up short and Burkhead handled the next series. Gilly looked slow on one or two of his carries I thought. I am strongly considering trading him.

In his early years, Kelly was no murderer but he was on par with say a VY. Total scum.

Deep, deep, stuff. Cute analogies are good for about, give or take, zero wins per year in the NFL. Perhaps McDermott will consume our opponents with fireballs from his eyes and bolts of lightning from his arse but I'm not holding my breath. Well that's just categorically wrong.

That has emerged as a contender for the weakest argument in team sports, in my opinion. Canton is full of players that didn't win much.

What do you call your schtick around here lately? FOR THE LOVE OF GOD....LEAVE MCBEANE ALONE!!!

Happy Birthday, Kirby!

So a guy unfit to play in the NFL spent all offseason #2 on our depth chart and it took McD and Beane until 10 days before the opener to figure this out and you two feel that because every other team in the NFL already knew he was a bum, which is why they all passed on him in the waiver claim, that this vindicates the decision making of our FO? That is interesting.

I'm still confused as to how a player goes from #2 on the depth chart to not good enough to play in the NFL in the eyes of our front office (and our expert fans). Seems like we skipped a few steps along the way. Not sure why it takes until September to determine whether hes the heir apparent to a possible hall of fame back or he should sell Kias. And what does that say about #s 3, 4, 5, and 6 on our massive RB depth chart that they spent all offseason playing catch up to a guy who apparently isn't an NFL caliber talent? Inspiring stuff.

You missed the disclaimer which continues "unless a trade partner can be found or we cut them."

This post was actually edited. Really makes you wonder what kind of brilliance was left on the cutting room floor.

That was pretty.

Yes, but if growth in demand for wings exceeds growth in chicken production....shortage of wings relative to demand.