Jauronimo

I have similar sentiments to the Tua extension. Not enough years and not enough dollars!

See...this is why I keep my money stuffed in various mattresses or in old coffee cans buried around the backyard. Everything is going straight to hell!

I really thought this was going to be another fire McDermott thread presenting an argument that he was turning into a cockroach

Dear Work Journal, OMG, today was the worst day EVER!! Everyone was sooo mean to me today and someone even read YOU without my permission $%$#^! *cat HISSSing noises* #$@%^$. I feel so violated and I'm soo stressing that whoever read this is going to find out about my secret crush on Slippery Pete the electrician (hes sooo cute sighhhh)...I'm totes quitting this job after I get my drivers license. Well, todays another day and I'm trying to stay positive. Talk to you later! Love, Sweats

Cody Ford allegedly cheated on his former fiance. They broke up because of it. Now he is dating someone else who sometimes wears a jacket. Cody's former fiance thinks new girl is wearing her old jacket. Social media drama ensues.

I can't believe I read that whole article. Sadly enough, it wasn't the biggest waste of my time today.

I understood what you wrote and what you have implied perfectly, because this is the least complicated issue I have dealt with today: Diggs is a highly inefficient player and this offense has improved in his absence by elevating more efficient players like Shakir. Despite understanding your point, your data, and your argument....I still disagree. I disagree that Diggs is an inefficient player either historically or currently due to decline, I disagree that the offense has improved as a result of losing Diggs, and I disagree that Diggs replacements are better. I believe Diggs had to go, but I do not believe we are the better for it. If Diggs is here and motivated, I believe he is still the best WR on the team by considerable margin I would consider an entire body of work when assessing a player's efficiency because, in my opinion, 10 games does not trump the other 118 games Diggs has played. Why wouldn't you want consider the entire body of work before confidently declaring that the offense improved by losing the best skill player on the team for the past four seasons? What we can agree on is that once Brady took over, Diggs stats took a big hit. But extrapolating the best 10 game stretch in one player's career and the worst 10 game stretch in another's to draw sweeping conclusions about the future success of this offense is a risky endeavor, especially when there are multiple factors at play. Diggs was never an inefficient player before so I find it difficult to believe that his talents suddenly declined as precipitously as his stats coincidentally once Brady took over play calling responsibilities. Stefon Diggs statistics have consistently been in line with #1 WRs who command 150 targets per season. If Brady can't get anything out of him, again I might have to look at Diggs 118 games and weigh them against Brady's 10 games at OC, and call into question Brady's ability as a coordinator. If anything, this fact set has me more concerned about Brady because I have a much larger track record to rely on in assessing Diggs. Diggs yards per target stand out in particular over those 10 games. I guess I don't fault Diggs for being asked to catch so many balls behind or at the line of scrimmage. You brought Shakir into this conversation in the first place and then declared I had to stop talking about Shakir. I do not recognize your authority, and you will have to get comfortable with that. Why bring him up in the first place if he is irrelevant to the discussion? And why even bother comparing stats for a slot WR with 65 career targets to a #1 who had 160 targets last season?

If you want to die on the hill of 10 games makes two careers, you are more than welcome.

Right....because the conversation was sooooo hard to follow.....who could possibly comprehend such elevated discourse? The answer is no one, clearly. You said "Gone are two highly inefficient players in Diggs and Davis". There was no qualification. You have had multiple opportunities to amend that statement but instead you have tripled down. I can only go off what is written. Diggs 2022 season was an excellent year by any conceivable metric. Again, this is a preposterous opinion. So what are you arguing at this point? Are you arguing that the last 10 games of 2023 is representative of who Diggs and Shakir are as players? I hope not. I would hate to see this position fall apart when Shakir's efficiency numbers come back down to earth, as every reasonable person knows that they will, now that he is stepping into a larger role in this offense. It would be even the worse if Diggs sees an increase in his efficiency numbers now that he is not the focal point of the passing offense. I highly doubt the Texas offense will find themselves so lost for answers that they throw 5 to 6 prayers somewhere in the vicinity of Diggs a game or try to force a screen game through him.

And you are only comparing Shakir's small body of work as the 3rd or 4th option in this offense to the worst stretch of games in Diggs' career. And the conclusion that you're drawn, is that the best WR play this franchise has ever seen is "highly inefficient". Why don't you just stop embarrassing yourself.

Shakir having off the charts efficiency stats, which all reasonable people expect to come back down to earth this year, does not mean that anyone who was actually a featured receiver in an NFL offense is "highly inefficient". Diggs catch rate is negligibly different than AJ Brown, Puka, Justin Jefferson. Diggs 2023 stats were nearly identical to his 2021 stats. I guess he's just been quietly inefficient his whole career? Yes, you know Shakir's stats. No, you don't know how to interpret them and have drawn silly conclusions about Diggs in the process.

So 8 against the Jets and only 2 the remaining 15 games of the season? Seems far fetched to me. I don't know what your duck preference has to do with anything but Stefon Diggs as "highly inefficient" is crazy talk.

I only go to iPic. Bottles of wine and beer delivered to my seat.

Since when does spending correlate with success?

There are no women on the internet.

The Chiefs have led the league in holding penalties the past few seasons, I believe. They have been called for only one holding penalty in the past two super bowls. But far fewer penalties are called in the post season.

So you're saying that Keon is quietly fast?

Better than the Bears game I hope.

I really have not experienced any negativity on this board. If anything, I find TBD to be a bunch of pollyanna, hippy, slackers. I think this is mostly in your head.

Groot absolutely dominated Broderick Jones on Saturday. Those were not clean up sacks. He has looked very disruptive so far in his limited reps. I thought Groot looked great early last year before the foot injury derailed his season.

The prime spots are in an area reserved for TBD members who sign up. That lands you in a ring of all your favorite internet friends. A regular spot is first come first served in general population. You have to pay extra to tailgate amongst the normies.

I guess no one remembers his daily press conferences, called at his request, to address whatever he found while googling himself all day during his summer of recovery. Total narcissist.

So you're saying we quietly got better?

And not workout in the offseason.

One prime, por favor.