BringBackFergy

To all you naysayers: what about the Titans game last year?? Yeah, thought so. *mic drop*

So this explains why he was slugging down Listerine on the bench...he had dry mouth after eating sugar cubes.

So you'd rather have the 6th or 7th overall pick instead of 1st?

John from Hemet - if you need a sponsor...I'm here for ya bro.

For once, please, just say it: 1) Tyrod sucks, and 2) Rex's defense blows. Just say it!!!

Karlos isn't on the team. Everything else...spot on.

Bargaining power.

Fukkk the playoffs...I want the #1 Pick.

We're on our way. Go Bills!!

Are you saying the code that I wrote is defective? The programming sequence takes all metrics and criteria into consideration. The fact that it projects an outcome adverse to your own wishes shouldn't detract from the credibility of the algorithm itself. Head to head and common opponents has a bearing on our ability to secure the #1 pick I assure you.

There's a kid at Michigan called Julius Peppers. Yep...I'll take him.

Of course, but I'm talking about controlling our own destiny.

The algorithm predicts intangibles like crowd noise in December, prevailing wind patterns and officiating tendencies over 10-15 years. All of those factors play into the normalized coefficient which results in a probability. So, for instance, our dreadful playoff drought over 15 years increases the likelihood of losing out (and correspondingly increases the likelihood of the Titans, Browns and Bengals winning out). As such, in the event all factors work together, we can solidify the first pick by January and start our scouting process early.

You fail to consider probabilities. My algorythm allows me to enter 15 years of data. As such, the probability of us losing out far exceeds our ability to win out. Air go, if I already know the answer to us losing out, I find the silver lining. But you go right ahead and calculate our chances of making the playoffs which is unlikely...I, on the other hand, am taking a potential negative and creating a positive result. The first pick int he draft to utilize or trade away for multiple picks. Hardly defeatist

Rather than take a defeatist attitude, I like to look at the silver lining.

Whoever it is...we have a good chance to get him or her.

Uhhhh, head to head and common opponents (I think I said that)

I created an algorithm that allows you to input all types of metrics and data (similar to the ESPN Playoff calculator) and, in the end, gives you a projection of where we will draft next May 2017. I'll download the program and link it here shortly. Based on certain criteria, and if everything falls our way, we can still secure the first overall pick next year. Obviously, we need to lose out and end the season 6-10. Then, since Cleveland is one of our losses, they will have beaten us head to head. In that case, the next tie breaker is common opponents. We will have lost that category as well. We still need all the other 2, 3, and 4 win teams to win out. I don't want to play spoiler this year...I want to have what is rightfully ours. The #1 pick.

Damn...you're old.

Bitsy and Maggie have been naughty girls.

But they are regular visitors as per GPS info I have gathered.

OK, I have to post this...discretion be damned: "PM to Fergy - seriously. If you take a look at Patches (the brown gal middle o he bottom row with the pink scarf...she sure do have a purty mouth. Keep this quiet. ChefJim"

Reggie needs to **** or get off the pot... There, that should fix him.