loedward22

no... but they can be beat every time FASTER!

This is how I'm feeling right now too. I don't think they'll forfeit. I just won't be shocked if they do.

It's not going to shock me if we forfeit this game. The team might take a vote, and if more players want to sit out and not get paid than want to play and risk it...

no, that's Barry Sanders

According to the PFT article (take it for what it's worth) the reschedule would cut the divisional schedule for every team down to one: "As one coach mapped it out, teams would play their division rivals only once, and one of their interconference games would be scrapped."

I think it would hurt the Bills a little though, because 2 of the 4 games which would be removed from their schedule would be against the Dolphins and Jets...

timing. they were having to fly today and didn't want to make the problem way worse by having all these guys board a plane together.

It's pessimism. I'm naturally pessimistic and recognize when I'm having pessimistic thoughts and still can't do anything to stop it...

I understand that being the case live, but once something has been called an interception and they have to review it, then it seems to me like the standard has changed (as it now needs to be conclusive).... Is there any precedence for this situation and if so how was it handled?

I haven't heard this question discussed anywhere (TV, post game radio, nor on here). If they call it an interception on the field, don't they need conclusive evidence to overturn it? Therefore the problem was them calling it an interception on the field, and there not being anything conclusive to overturn it. From every angle they showed it was a fifty fifty which is the opposite of conclusive...

Good comparison... I hadn't put that together yet but you are spot on.

I don't believe that McKenzie play was broadcast either...

The GB fanbase has experienced some pretty significant success and doesn’t know pain like we know. The special thing about Buffalo’s fanbase to me is it being what it is despite arguably the most painful history.

3 game losing streak. Beat Pitt. Lost to NE, Jets, and Texans

Actually you can get it for $100 - put your location to India and it's $100. At least that was the case last year.

I actually really like "Football Team" and would stick with that. But if they have to change I'd go with the "Burgundy and Gold".

Not necessarily.. I think all of this was orchestrated after he was with the raiders.

It wouldn’t surprise me if the patriots had been telling him how to accomplish this goal all along

They kept saying during the broadcast that the Bills never went 4-0 in a pre-season. This was the first time they went 4-0, which I think is awesome because it might well have been the last opportunity (change in pre-season seems imminent)

Brown said the nickname was given to him when he was a baby and had nothing to do with him being fast.

no way. he owns the league. what will be most interesting and infuriating is how QUICKLY this get's swept under the rug.

He's correct. Should Barkley start tomorrow we would technically have had 5 starters. Those you listed and McCoy.

Peterman being on the roster at this point is unexplainable. I started to wonder if the Jesus theory was the case after Peterman remained on the roster after the Baltimore game. Another poster up above suggested another valid theory (pride). At this point I just want to know how it's possible that Peterman is on the team.

I am so happy they are finally fielding this question. I've long felt this is the case and it finally sounds like they're going to talk about it.

Schopp came back at beginning of hour 4 but made no mention of what happened (Bulldog either) I don’t think McDermott would call back... some underlying would. But I’m not saying I think this happened, just speculation as to a possible explanation.