Yes, he will. Less often than he has been for the Jets, but even taking off he's a monstrous talent and player (when not being asked to cover TEs and RBs by Bowles)
That is correct. The team trading for Sammy needed to add a fairly decent player.
Also, I think your value on draft picks is outdated. Teams value picks now more than ever. The cost controlled salary in the wake of the mega-contracts for QBs (and others) has teams looking for cheap cost controlled talent in positions where it makes sense. It's why the scheme in New England where Brady takes a lesser salary and the Pats buy a veritable ***load of his $50 vegan bars gives them such an advantage.
Yes you do. At least own up to it instead of "pretending" you are just asking the question. "Asking the question" is a common tactic of someone who wants to express an unpopular opinion, but doesn't want to take the heat.
it ended for me when somehow he managed to win a court case (funded by Peter Theil because he was upset that gawker outed him) and that it wasn't challenged further thus allowing some terrible case law to exist.
talking about the fans being losers and having "little jobs" while putting up average numbers for a #1 then talking about how your next contract is going to set the market is a low key prima donna?
lol, what...he can't do his job because 2 of his friends left the company? Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? Seriously, tell that to your boss...see how that goes.
Also, Watkins isn't "Healthy". He's already been missing camp time.
The sammy hate was out of control here, but there is no way he is a top receiver in the league. If they pay him as such then I wouldn't say it's smart to pay a top 30 guy like a top 5.
What was Darby last season? They didn't "let go" of either of them. They actually got something for a player who was going to walk at the end of the season.