CSBill

this!

is the real Grossman back . . . these Special Teams have been awful all season, again.

that was the play of the game . . . for all the wording reasons. he should have had him, and then the Giants are punting on 4th down The terrible play calls in the non-scoring red-zone trip (the 2nd one) are an admission of the one weakness of a 6 foot tall QB, they cannot hit the quick slants that you need in that territory—the bodies in front of them are just too big. So the solution is run him outside and hope you can free somebody up, but of course, that didn't happen. It won't go away—he is going to stay undersized, and in this circumstance, that is a big liability.

yes, because they have already figured out how to neutralize this defense

Epically Undisciplined team The play calling highly suspect And the officials take two touchdowns off the board with very suspect calls A great formula

Yeah, the name implies its something bad . . . "That's Bad, No That's Good" https://youtu.be/OCvp_Yg8hV4

Don't Ass-u-me

Bills 34 - Giants 24

Indeed, the pass thing is interesting. What does that tell us? The teams we've played are all pass-first in their offensive philosophy? We've led 2 of the 3, in the NFL, when teams are playing from behind that means they will generally pass more? In the one game we didn't lead, that team is the most "pass-first" them in the league? Teams feel the way to beat this Defense is to attack in from the air? If the Bills keep putting up points, and are more successful than not in stopping the pass, will teams start to try and grind out long drives to slow the game down? — i.e., Try to keep the offense off the field? (Of course the problem with that it that it seems to play right into the strength of the Bills Defense.) others . . . ??? Or, is all this just a fluke, a statistical anomaly? As Mark Twain said, "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics."

(In reference to Dixon) I'm not sure about the fat, but slow and "weak" ???? He just does't get the push we saw last year.

Yes, it is interesting. Personally, I never thought we had a problem, I always thought we had three very different good choices. The problem was, which style and direction did you want to go? I think we choose the best one for this team. And if - heaven forbid - something were to happen, we have a very capable backup.

necessary, but is it time to bring Bryce Brown back?

This!

mathematically, a Fish win is better for us

Urbik played well, certainly no drop off. But, if Miller is 100%, as others have suggested, he needs to be out there.

I doubt that, they were dopes alright, but I don't think intentionally so? So what Karlos and Tyrod did doesn't count? Thus the line is NOT very good. Not sure I follow your logic?

Lets not fall into the same trap we did after week one, will we never learn? A little humility goes a long way. Focus on next week and play them one at a time.

I wondered when you would get in here to defend your good name?

agree

Tyrod

priceless

yeah, but two plays into the game EJ leads them into the end zone! seems like the title said it all ????

I think our o-line will be Okay this year, but with room to improve: so we'll go for the best o-lineman available, whether a guard or tackle

Well, at least there is progress, we've evolved a long way from the demonstrative visceral judgments that took place the week after the trade.

I have the same problem, trying to figure out what I will do for four hours