Mr. WEO

They were busy listening in TO as Frazier sent out the same coverage twice....

if he can pay attention to what Kelce is shouting pre-snap to his teammates about his coverage and adjusts, then he is better than Levi Wallace.

Including the QB, 5 players touched that pass. That was only part of my point--I mentioned it because the only evaluators who matter didn't think he was worth locking up long term and don't seem worried about him entering free agency. That is a statement. That the threads exist is the point. You missed that. Debating the "improved play" of a 5th year 1st round starting player hints that his play has been questionable to this point, does it not? Look, I get it--this is a sore subject for you. You were hyping his every move in the shout box Monday night. But why is his 5th season the one where "he has a lot to prove"?

Stefanski the latest in a long line of Browns boneheads..

You left out how great it was seeing OJ in town...

Another Ertz thread or is this an Edmunds thread......?

Perhaps the poster's point is that the fact that you started a thread which in part congratulates other posters for coming forward to acknowledge that a 1st round draft picking his 5th year has "played well....so far this season" (Week 2) suggests there is a legitimate opposing view and debate about how good he really is. The fact that the Bills didn't offer him a new contract certainly tells us a lot as well. They paid Tre White after 3 years. Oliver is in his 4th year, probably will get paid. No one debates obviously superior players, nor do they need to start endless threads latching on to anything that might possible convince others a player is a superior player.

Picking up where Feliciano The Brave left off....

TBD in lobotomy mode--total disinhibition to post a thread on whatever pops into one's head. No filter. lol

If Hyde (and the Tenn WR) doesn't touch that ball, Poyer does not intercept it. It would have been a decent pass defended by Edmunds.

He's taking snaps away from Isaiah Hodgins though!!!!!

The answer is no. Can’t jump. Can’t find the handle.

Take Amtrak to Newark and watch them play Jets in November. Plenty of $68 seats on ticketmaster, etc.

no

this thread has aged well....

Not unless he's under center...

Come on! I read right here that Mitch could win 11 games easy with the Bills if Josh went down! lol

"Man's been through a lot, and probably deservedly so. Many think he deserved greater punishment. He took what the system imposed on him and has moved on, and I'm happy for him if he's found some peace." I mean...wtf. This is the ultimate definition of star struck.

The Chargers aren't named in the suit as a Defendant. They won't be telling the doctor/his practice's insurer how much to pay Taylor... The Browns traded for TT and named his starter when rookie minicamp started--meaning Hue Jackson traded for TT to have him start over rookie Mayfield--he was explicit about this. And what did they pay their incoming, new starting QB? Only 1 year and 10 million--hardly veteran starting QB money. What happened next? He was injured in week 3 and replaced forever by the rookie QB. No word yet on his lawsuit against the Browns.... Then the Chargers signed him as a likely starter in week 1 ahead of Herbert. What did they pay their likely starting QB? 2 years 11 million. Injured and lost his job to an infinitely better rookie. On to Houston where he was brought in to be the likely starter after Watson told Culley he will never play for Houston again. What did they sign their new starting QB for? 2.5 million dollars. Guess what happened next......that's right, injured again ( he made it to Week 2) and again replaced by a rookie QB--this time by the worst of the 3. On to the Giants. More backup money . So it is obvious TT cannot make any serious claim that he lost "FA starter money"---he took far less to be stating on the Browns and the Texans. At every stop since the Bills, every HC has seen the guy get injured and not be able to supplant the rookie behind him when reactivated. He's not a starting caliber QB. He gets injured all the time and then beaten out by rookies. Therefore he cannot (and certainly has not) "proven lost wages". It will also be hard to argue loss of future earnings when he lost no earnings--back on the active roster after a few weeks off and making his full salary all along. Plus, he went on to get another 11 million over the following 2 years (and counting) by 2 more teams. "Threatened his career"? "Forced him to take the shot"? Is that even alleged in the suit or are you simply making that up as well? Pretty wild stuff lol. You seem, bizarrely, to believe that medical complication is always evidence of medical malpractice. I enjoy when posters say "I'm not a doctor or a lawyer"....yet go on to claim "I see this happen ALL the time". Of the small number of cases that go to trial, the overwhelming majority are wins for the defendant: "Physicians win 80% to 90% of the jury trials with weak evidence of medical negligence, approximately 70% of the borderline cases, and even 50% of the trials in cases with strong evidence of medical negligence. With only one exception, all of the studies of malpractice settlements also find a correlation between the odds of a settlement payment and the quality of care provided to the plaintiff. Between 80% and 90% of the claims rated as defensible are dropped or dismissed without payment". You also claim you would be "shocked" if this didn't settle. Yet this suit was scheduled to go to trial in November until both sides decided to wait out this season and now it is scheduled for April. So we can assume discover is over and no settlement was reached. What are you shocked about? The insurer must think this is a winnable case or they would have settled. How do you explain this--you said this is the easiest case to settle.

boom goes the thread

Rib fractures and pneumothorax are nothing alike in terms of recovery.

I don't know the financial relationship between this doctor and the team. TT is suing him and his practice group so I'm assuming he is not an employee of the team, but a contractor.

hes not suing for extra medical expenses in this case

If he was told "one complication of this procedure is pneumothorax or temporary collapse of the lung", that he deserves money for this known possible outcome?

do you feel that all or any known complications should be sued over? Of course it is. It was an elective procedure, not an emergency. Unless TT can prove he was forced to have a procedure he did not agree to and did not consent to, then what is his case? How is it that you are able to "promise" us that you know the circumstances of him having this procedure?