All Activity

No, it wouldn’t. Why must your reading comprehension be so poor?? Kay: “It is up to an INDIVIDUAL woman and NO ONE ELSE to decide what’s best for her own life.” Also, your non-sequitur transgender bigotry has been duly noted… Ghost of Charlie Kirk: “But what’s a woman?? What’s a woman, Kay?! Huh?! What’s a woman??!! Aaaaaaaaaaghhhh!!!” Kay: “A woman is a person with the brain morphology and electrochemical brain functioning aligned with that typically of a female, which may or may not be (but normally is) gender congruent with one’s chromosomes, reproductive equipment, and general body morphology. Any gender incongruency (i.e., gender dysphoria) is believed to originate during prenatal development and may be partly influenced by genetics.”

So you're saying the architect of the :13 meltdown who also used 9-1-1 jihadists as an example of good teamwork makes bad decisions? You might be on to something...

No need to be disingenuous 4th, of course you read it. It doesn’t make you less cool, relative to where you already reside on the cool scale now, to acknowledge what is obvious. There would be precious little need for you to respond with the novella above if you “didn’t care”. Good stuff on the politicians, your liberal leaders and some of our consevative leaders are not above reproach. On world “piece”, btw… I was told this story about George Carlin by someone well in the know. One year, his holiday card to the family showed a cat on top of a standing dog in a…unique position….and at the bottom in holiday colors and font was the word “PIECE”. I always thought that pretty clever.

We run the Eastern Lake Erie Offense. Duh.

You cannot save someone from themselves... That is also a violation of free will...

Grand-Stander bumps his six Epstein threads with no new information SOP

Ummm yeah. ***** Jimmy Kimmel.

That’s not true. Even JFF can be helped. Psalm 34:6 ("This poor man called, and the LORD heard him; he saved him out of all his troubles")

The second is easier than the first... that was just good crafty receiver play by a vet receiver who manages to find the spot in the zone to be available to his QB. Technically (and I haven't got my ipad with me so scrolling to the right play in the all22 on my phone is a B word) I think the safety is the responsible guy but I think the Bills played that reasonably well. Tua and Hill just made a play, give them credit. On the first - again without the benefit of the all22 in a lot of what the Bills run, yes Bernard would have responsibility for the running back. I can't remember the play to know if I think he was legit spying Tua but that would feel an odd choice if he was.

Came here to say this - Erhardt-Perkins not West Coast @TH3. Where you throw the ball has no bearing on the offensive system. And it's a descendant of the Brady/Charlie Weiss Pats system. If you can't beat em, become them.

Hawes is legit - so unselfish as a blocker with great technique and leverage. He brings great effort and intensity to each snap. You can tell how much the team and O-line appreciate him by how he was mobbed in the EZ - Allen could not even get through the crowd to congratulate him. Having a rookie that acclimates that quickly and provides so much value right out of the gate - kudos scouting and drafting team.

The consistency theme just isn't there. I can't describe it eloquent words it's just the eye and the sniff test don't muster with the product we're seeing. Nothing seems quite cohesive nor complimentary in a system that works. Using the play action to set up the long ball, using the runs to shut down the pass rush, bouncing it to the outside on runs or speaking the edge to make safeties bite Game package itself is what Josh is describing as taking with the defense gives you. The NFL is doing a lot of that these days, coordination is becoming quite vanilla. I don't know how much Josh is changing it at the line but that also might be something

Has there ever been a group of posters more wrong ??? 🤣

Coach McDermott, is that you? I am waiting wondering how minn looks with Went as well

Bump

I think Steelers win that one. Be interested to see the Jets with Tyrod starting. You have to think Baker will do a number on them. Also interested in Viking/Bengals. Cincy missing Burrow but how will the Vikes do with Wentz (!!!) at QB. I have a sneaking feeling their offense will look more like it did under Darnold but who knows. Eagles Rams should be good. I'm predicting the Rams defeat the champs. Then we'll see if the Chargers can sustain their great start. And of course, can the Giants beat the Chiefs. I hope that D line plays out of its skin and beats the living s*** out of Mahomes. KC fans think it'll be a walk in the park but I'd laugh my lunch up if they lost. A loss in OT would be wonderful.

41 points week one 30 points week two 32 points week three I'll take it

Bump

MAGA - always protect predators

Bump

I’m curious as to what you see that makes you think it isn’t structured ?