Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. "I support killing people for things they said. What? You want to fire me over things I said??"
  3. If Strong turns into the next 6th round gem, does anyone think Hairston could be a fit at nickel? I wouldn’t mind seeing Taron shift into one of the Safety roles - maybe not mid-season, but next year or so.
  4. Not good enough for a nickname.
  5. Can you admit that it's more than feasible Charlie was killed for his political beliefs? If so good day sir and go bills!
  6. I expect we'll know for certain within a few days as more official information is released, but at this stage, it seems exceedingly unlikely to me that this idiot was right of center.
  7. It’s just that athletes aren’t supposed to put other high performing athletes on blast. Last year Steve Smith said Keon Coleman “wasn’t the guy,” okay that was fair… at the time. But to have Allen tearing up the league, a day after he did something no other QB in the league has done in the 4th and to have Draymond criticizing his overall body of work, I think that’s somewhat noteworthy. What’s his agenda? Is it to rage bait or become a villain amongst Bills fans? If so, why? Did the Bills beat his favorite team or something?
  8. The picture of Tyler Robinson's ideology is becoming clearer and clearer, and it is the complete opposite of the left-wing attempt to claim he was actually a "right-wing groyper." That such a gambit was even tried is laughable.
  9. It would prove its political, that why you're avoiding it Sure, one of the sayings is For democracy! Do people commonly describe bugs, robots and aliens as fascists? You don't fight people. Is the movie independence day political?
  10. A man trying to draw clicks
  11. We’re talking about something subjective- whether a team “won a trade”. imo- It all depends on how high a bar the teams sets their bar. When the Bills traded for Diggs- we’re all fairly confidant that their main goal was to help Josh Allen become the best QB he can become. We weren’t a Super Bowl contender yet. Sure, they’d have liked to win a SB too, but supporting Josh was goal #1 imo. They accomplished that. When the Bills drafted Bruce- they were garbage and just adding building blocks for the franchises future was the goal. The packers have their QB and have paid him top dollar. They have some solid weapons under contract for the next few years and a HC they believe is their long term guy. I don’t believe that they gave up those picks and mortgaged that much cap in order to just get better on D. They could’ve signed several players this offseason if they just wanted to improve and would have lots more cap space and multiple draft picks to continue to add to their talent level regarding the bolded- the draft picks and salary cap space wouldn’t be used to get “a” player. They would be used to get several players. The cowboys had a mini dynasty because they hit on those assets acquired for “a” player. if they don’t win a Super Bowl with parsons- then they failed at achieving the goal that they have set for themselves. They have their QB and HC. Once you have them, you have one goal build to win a SB. No one will know what the assets traded away would’ve yielded had they held onto the them- but not winning a SB with him is an L in terms of their build. I get your points though and I don’t think that you’re wrong due to this being subjective. If I were the packers GM- and the team didn’t win a SB with parsons- I’d view that as a failure in my eyes.
  12. It is about the only place I see "liberal" social media posts, so yes
  13. C O D guy myself What would the 2nd question have to do with anything?
  14. I’m not a gamer but the description says a plot line is to spread managed democracy, would this game have political tones to it?
  15. OMG somebody said something!!
  16. Yes the code is from helldivers not the fascist part. I play it, do you. Any you conviently avoid my other question. You kill robots and bugs and aliens in that game. Lmao
  17. Final 5 minutes:
  18. And let's not forget that he likely cost Golden State another title with his stupid, dirty penalty against Lebron.
  19. Unless it’s a political online message board.
  20. Hegseth Meant What He Said: Air Force SGT Facing Consequences for Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Death Words only have power when backed by action. Yesterday, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced there would be zero tolerance for military members mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Today, those words are being backed by action as an Air Force Master Sergeant is under investigation for what Under Secretary of the Air Force Matt Lohmeier describes as conduct unbecoming of a non-commissioned officer. https://twitchy.com/eric-v/2025/09/13/hegseth-meant-what-he-said-air-force-sgt-facing-consequenses-for-celebrating-charlie-kirks-death-n2418906
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...