All Activity

The left wanted to turn down the temperature. Kimmel could have been responsible and instead he decided to lie which could result in more assassins coming up. This ***** is getting bad. Instead of toning down jimmy leveled uo

The flip side of that argument is that generally all of our 1st's are closer to 2nd's to begin with. Keon Coleman was truly a 2nd Round Pick. Regardless of whether it was our first pick or not. We moved our 1st for a 2nd, 3rd, and some change.

Shapiro is the easy answer of all the choices Dems have, but he does have some skeletons in the form of a murder cover-up allegation and I honestly don’t think the far left (growing percentage of the Democrat Party) or most people under 30 will vote for a Jew.

Thank you all, yesterday was a bad day and today was a good day. Trying to stack some good days! I’ll be watching the Bills on my phone tomorrow night from Childrens, no Amazon prime on the tv here. It’s super uncomfortable but I’m grateful for the care that she is getting, I find hope in the stories others have shared!

He lied to the audience. He is a bad look on the company. Show me the lawsuits. They should be coming soon right? LOL, you are fighting an uphill battle. The Democrats will probably lose in the biggest landslide in political history. Your approval rating was low before the Kirk assassination. It's going to be lower. And no, Trump doesn't.

The red line was the public assassination at a free speech open debate forum for the whole world to see. Thanks for acknowledging these ghouls have always been nothing but Democrat surrogates on the public airwaves.

More cowardice. Untrue blanket statement not backed by any evidence or link. It’s nothing new. .

Nope. She didn't just say had different politics. That's what she said at most? Once a college scholarship recipient with a promising future, Robinson had "become more political," leaning left and supporting "pro-gay and trans rights," his mother said, according to court documents. She also recounted heated arguments between Robinson and his father, who held sharply different views and regularly sparred over their competing ideologies.

Nice clip. McGovern took that hand off sooo smoothly.

Stalking Samantha: 13 Years of Terror was absolutely mind blowing. Three episode true-crime miniseries on Hulu. I won’t spoil anything, but I just kept thinking to myself that if this were my daughter, I’d have tuned this idiot up with a Louisville slugger after like year five. Check it out. ✌️

Thanks for the tip. I'm not familiar with either name but I create content and screen recording is a really cool tool to have. I just checked and Canva apparently also has this capability and I use Canva. 👍

When you have a QB like Allen and Mahomes or a Brady, Manning in prior years, they can all easily make a mediocre WR look like #1. Adding a true #1 WR to the Bills would just mean less catches for everyone else and maybe even less running plays by Cook. And if like many of the true #1 WR's in about 2 years adding more discontent too. Look at the one year when we had Bledsoe throwing to Peerless Price and made him look great. We were able to get a 1st round pick for him in a trade. How'd that turn out for Atlanta?

Pritzger. Shapiro. A white man on center-left. But please tell me how this is normal and good.

There is no such thing as antifa but whatever keeps you people out of the same bars as me, that will be fine.

What about inciting violence? The First Amendment does not protect incitement, but the Supreme Court has defined that term quite narrowly, requiring a likelihood of imminent violence. Mere advocacy of violence, terrorism or the overthrow of the government is not enough; the words must be meant to and be likely to produce violence or lawlessness right away. In 1969, in Brandenburg v. Ohio, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the conviction of a leader of a Ku Klux Klan group under an Ohio statute that banned the advocacy of terrorism. The Klan leader, Clarence Brandenburg, had urged his followers at a rally to “send the Jews back to Israel” and to “bury” Black people, using a racial slur. He also said they should consider “revengeance” against politicians and judges who were unsympathetic to white people. Only Klan members and journalists were present. Because Mr. Brandenburg’s words fell short of calling for immediate violence in a setting where such violence was likely, the Supreme Court ruled that he could not be prosecuted for incitement. Mr. Trump has been the beneficiary of that ruling. When he was running for president in 2016, he pointed to some protesters at one of his rallies and told the crowd to “get ’em out of here.” The protesters, who said they were then viciously assaulted, sued him for inciting a riot. Mr. Trump won the suit. A federal appeals court, referring to Brandenburg, ruled that his exhortation was protected by the First Amendment. “In the ears of some supporters, Trump’s words may have had a tendency to elicit a physical response, in the event a disruptive protester refused to leave,” Judge David W. McKeague wrote for the majority, “but they did not specifically advocate such a response.”

That didn't answer my question. Give me a name. So you're saying that this person is going to flip millions of voters? Right now the Dems approval rating is between 8%-20% lol. Even CNN and WSJ is reporting its awful over there. Give me a name who is going to rise the Dems out of the ashes.

Trump does this every single day with zero repercussion so I’m not sure why there’s an exception here. His parents never said he was a “left extremist,” at most they said his politics were different than the families.

Can courts prohibit offensive speech that causes listeners distress? Here again, the Supreme Court has said “no.” Courts would not stop a planned march by the American Nazi Party in Skokie, Ill., in 1977, though it would have been deeply distressing to the many Holocaust survivors who lived there. In 2011, by an 8-to-1 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protected the Westboro Baptist Church, which protested at military funerals with signs bearing messages like “America is Doomed” and “Thank God for Dead Soldiers.” “Speech is powerful,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the majority. “It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and — as it did here — inflict great pain.” But under the First Amendment, he went on, “we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker.” Instead, the national commitment to free speech, he said, required protection of “even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate.”

new name for screencast-o-matic, if that helps.

Oh you guys are playing dolls again huh Why is he some kind of holy martyr? Why is he infallible? Why is he getting treated the same as the Pope? Is this the best you have? A stupid edgelord podcaster?

I was awake and watched the first one, second one (different Dr) and I was knocked out big time.

I'm sure that's going to go over well when he told the audience a lie. The guy mislead an audience. The guys own parents and friends said he was a left extremist. He specifically stated he was against everything Charlie Kirk. And Kimmel told millions upon millions that this kid was MAGA. ABC has every right to fire this guy for that. That is intentionally misleading the public and you're in the spotlight. There will be no lawsuit.

I've never seen anything created on screenpal. Pretty cool!