Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I hope Sauce is not seriously injured. That's the risk teams take when they go all in on one player to try and sustain success.
  3. And that's why you shouldn't trade 2 first round picks for a CB
  4. Most estimates of his speed that I've seen suggest that he runs the 40 in the low to mid 4.4s. He is generally seen as more quick than fast. In the low 4.4s, you can still beat a lot of CBs. The bigger issue is that most see him as a slot receiver. That would still leave Buffalo with the dilemma on who lines up outside.
  5. He looked very gimpy leaving to the Locker room.
  6. Sauce looks to have a non-contact leg injury.
  7. If Bucs lose today that division is going to get interesting
  8. I don't see any way he doesn't win MVP this year
  9. Sometimes I go and walk the street Behind the green sheet of glass A million miles below their feet A million miles, a million miles I'll be with you, girl Like being low Hey-hey-hey, like being stoned
  10. Stafford, his 28th TD pass since his last interception. New NFL record.
  11. Yeah, if that offense gets going they are going to be a really tough out
  12. I was able to purchase a NFL Sunday ticket for the rest of the regular season including tax $63.00. Its a great bargain for anyone who needs or might want it.
  13. Well this game isn’t starting very well for Indianapolis.
  14. The odd thing is that the system is so stale, that guys from years ago can step right in. And its also odd we can't teach new guys, but much of the league seems to have the defense completely figured out.
  15. Interested to see how Stroud plays today.
  16. Not a good start for the Colts on O. 3 and out Also, I am impressed every time I see how ripped DeMeco Ryans is
  17. Houston’s Defense is so nasty, my goodness. If Stroud can elevate that Offense at all, they’re a wagon. Big if though.
  18. Five straight three and outs for Indi going back to last week
  19. The Democrats’ Latest Faux Scandal By John Hinderaker Here are my thoughts on the controversy: 1) The story is based on anonymous “sources,” i.e., deep state leakers. Unless and until someone steps forward, identifies himself, tells us what he knows and how he knows it, and takes responsibility for his statements, I assume everything in the story is probably a lie. 2) Given the lack of regard for the “law of armed conflict” that is consistently shown by our enemies, my reaction is: boo hoo. 3) Is there really a “law of armed conflict” that says you can only shoot at a target once? And if someone escapes an initial bombing, or burst of fire, or whatever, he is home free and can’t again be targeted? I’d like to see that law. I haven’t seen any news source cite to it. 4) If such a rule exists and applies in the present context, it is stupid. If it applies, and one were determined to follow it, it would incentivize a massive first strike that would eliminate any chance of survivors. And would also increase the risk of collateral, unintended damage. Meanwhile, it appears that the Trump administration may be intent on bringing about regime change in Venezuela. If armed conflict develops, the fate of the narco-traffickers will soon be forgotten. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/11/the-democrats-latest-faux-scandal.php
  20. I'm going Colts. Want Houston to rack up some L's
  21. Colts have to have the quietest fans when their team is on offense. You'd think the stands were empty
  22. You have an unrealistically inflated expectation of the social life of us posters
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...