Langston Walker Update

[Sisyphean Bills]

Very true. It is the small cross section of two much larger groups. The group that thought Peters sucked as a football player and the group that thought Walker was an adequate replacement.

And, anybody that understands line play would be in neither of those groups.

[billybob]

Bills FO: Walker get over here you are our new starting LT

 

Walker: Thank you sir but I don't think I'm really cut out for LT, I've tried before and I sucked.

 

 

Bills FO: Listen Walker we're in the Bills front office and we know what we are doing, just do your best

 

Walker: yes sir I'll do my best

 

some times passes

 

Bills FO: Walker why did you tell us you could play LT, you stink, you suck, we are cutting you right now, we can't abide people like you in our fine organization.

[Wilson from Gamehendge]

Here is a video proving that Walker has been staying in shape by lifting weights...

 

 

[rstencel]

Here is a video proving that Walker has been staying in shape by lifting weights...

 

 

 

Doesnt look like hes been doing much cardio.

[PDaDdy]

From his own interview comments for one. Fact he would stand around so much in plays for another. Looked at tapes from last year, compared to this preseason, and noticed that he didn't have the hustle or follow through has shown in past. When play was away from him, he would hold his blocks, when no one rushed him he would look for someone to block, and finished his blocks frequently. This preseason he did allot of watching when play wasn't his way, and when he blocked, he only held for a few seconds then let go allot, rather than driving and or finishing. Can understand him not being able to keep up with a smaller guy sometimes, but if gets his hands on them, he should be able to finish them like has shown in past.

 

I'm sure you saw what you saw but I would draw a different conclusion. I think you seeing him play differently is a reflection of his lack of ability to play LT. I also don't recall Langston saying he wasn't motivated to play LT I assume you are equating his lack of optimism with lack of trying. He was obviously not optimistic but I wouldn't be optimistic going into the ring with Mike Tyson. I just know I'm not the right guy for that job!

 

I'm sorry but it is just a complete fantasy that a significant contributing factor to his failure was lack of enthusiasm. The lack of enthusiasm was a symptom not the problem. HUGE difference.

[PDaDdy]

I wasn't meaning to imply that he would ever actually play at that weight, just that he would be one heck of an athlete if could get to it. What I meant it to say is that if he got in shape, and got to the 350 range. He would be much quicker at changing directions, and have quicker first step that is needed for LT. Doubt he was much less than 380 this year however, and he looked bigger this year than last to me.

 

 

Difference of opinion I guess. I don't see Walker as a LT at any weight. He was moved there out of desperation not on field performance.

[PDaDdy]

Bills FO: Walker get over here you are our new starting LT

 

Walker: Thank you sir but I don't think I'm really cut out for LT, I've tried before and I sucked.

 

 

Bills FO: Listen Walker we're in the Bills front office and we know what we are doing, just do your best

 

Walker: yes sir I'll do my best

 

some times passes

 

Bills FO: Walker why did you tell us you could play LT, you stink, you suck, we are cutting you right now, we can't abide people like you in our fine organization.

 

LOL...TOO TRUE!!!!

[rstencel]

I'm sure you saw what you saw but I would draw a different conclusion. I think you seeing him play differently is a reflection of his lack of ability to play LT. I also don't recall Langston saying he wasn't motivated to play LT I assume you are equating his lack of optimism with lack of trying. He was obviously not optimistic but I wouldn't be optimistic going into the ring with Mike Tyson. I just know I'm not the right guy for that job!

 

I'm sorry but it is just a complete fantasy that a significant contributing factor to his failure was lack of enthusiasm. The lack of enthusiasm was a symptom not the problem. HUGE difference.

 

Yes I am partially tying them together. When people are vocal about not being happy about doing something, it usually shows in their performance. And watching his performance didn't look to me like he was finishing plays or hustling. It is true could be reading to much into it, but that it sure looked that way to me.

[SuperKillerRobots]

Hold up - after Peters was traded and up until Walker was let go - Walker was deemed by a lot on this board to be better than Peters and an upgrade! He was so great according to some in filling in for Peters last year and he only gave up 3 sacks last year and his long arms and footwork would negate his lack of mobility. Now he is being cast off as being on the level of Mike Williams! Help me I'm confused; did he just get bad overnight? Oh wait - the Bills staff said his play regressed - if they sign Runyan and put Butler on the bench after playing him out of position will his play regress as well? If Levitre struggles all season will his play just be deemed as he is learning and improving?

 

Look its one thing for delusional fans to hate on player and overhype another and at the same time make excuses for players the have a liking for; it is another for Bills management to do the same! This isn't Madden folks this is the N. F. L. which stands for Not For Long - unless you want to talk about our Non Playoff Streak!

 

I still think he's a decent player and worth having on your team even as a starter, as long as you are not going to run an offense that requires him to not get his breath in between plays though.

[bluv]

Definitely some good points in there. QB has been a problem for us since Kelly. A fact that everyone here laments. It's not the only way to make the play offs or win a super bowl but it sure freakin' helps and we haven't had that guy since.

 

Of course we can't be stocked with pro bowl talent at every position. It's just one facet, but we need to be willing to pay at least SOME of the good to pro bowl talent we draft or develop. We hang on to and over pay for chumps for lineman and let GOOD to GREAT CBs run through us like a turnstile. We should be drafting impact players at any position that gives us value when its our pick instead of continually restocking the shelves with CB because we won't pay the last guy fair market value.

Until we find a franchise QB, a flexible coaching staff, and scouts to bring in talent to either fit a scheme we will always be on the verge!

[JohnC]

You need to go back and check! There were plenty who pointed out how well Walker stepped in the first 2 games and played so well and how Peters gave up 11 sacks to Walkers 3. Don't forget those wwho poined out how we averaged a half yard more per carry running right than left. You don't remember all those Peters was a fat lazy bum comments or how Walker and Butler were the best players on the line. It might not have been you or your friends but it was plenty of insane similar comments going on until 6 days ago! Remember how some were quick to defend Walker once Mark Sclerth called him a journeyman? Face it: fans on this board over react and jump on board to bash players they don't like; especially those who want to be paid or leave. Once they make a bad play the haters jump on it, point it out and others feed in and then they make it indictative of that players whole body of work. It goes the same way in the opposite direction as some can make one key play and it can get overhyped for days to weeks; especially if they play a position of a player who is being ganged banged!

 

I don't want to belabor the Peters issue but isn't it curious that the Eagles made the trade and almost immediately signed him to the mega-deal worthy of an upper tier LT while the Bills were adamant that they were not going to give him an upgraded contract. The Eagles have been in the NFL Championship game five out of the last ten years. The Bills have not made the playoffs over the past decade, including this year. Which organization has demonstrated good personnel judgment, and which organization has demonstrated an abysmal personnel judgment? If you are not sure, just look at the records.

[K-9]

I don't want to belabor the Peters issue but isn't it curious that the Eagles made the trade and almost immediately signed him to the mega-deal worthy of an upper tier LT while the Bills were adamant that they were not going to give him an upgraded contract. The Eagles have been in the NFL Championship game five out of the last ten years. The Bills have not made the playoffs over the past decade, including this year. Which organization has demonstrated good personnel judgment, and which organization has demonstrated an abysmal personnel judgment? If you are not sure, just look at the records.

 

Can you say revisionist history?

 

There's no need to go done this badly worn road again but when people just make sh*t up to support their view I have to call it. Get acquainted with the facts.

 

GO BILLS!!!

[bluv]

Can you say revisionist history?

 

There's no need to go done this badly worn road again but when people just make sh*t up to support their view I have to call it. Get acquainted with the facts.

 

GO BILLS!!!

Dont forget we have marketing guys acting as GM's - they know how to make a player look selfish - it really isn't that hard come to think of it. The real behind the scnes facts are (common sense rules): he asked for an upgrade and was originally told no as we just redone your contract, he threaten to hold out. After it made the Bills look bad that he was the 3rd highest paid player on the O-line when he was one of the best in football, they either made him a market offer or a marketing ploy statement to say that they did to keep good face. Regardless Peters didn't like the offer and he was branded as being selfish; wanting to be the highest paid O-lineman; whatever. After his holdout was unsuccessful, he played out the season and had an attitude that he was playing out his contract and bolting town regardless of what he was offered as he felt he was wronged and probably didn't care much for Buffalo anyway. So what? they had him under contract and since he has the ability and will only get paid when he performs at a high level, he would have bust his a$$ to get his way out of Buffalo. Then we could have franchised him after 2 years. Good franchises dont let young,elite Pro Bowl talent at hard to fill positions such as QB, LT, DE,DT, etc leave your squad easily.

[JohnC]

Can you say revisionist history?

 

There's no need to go done this badly worn road again but when people just make sh*t up to support their view I have to call it. Get acquainted with the facts.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

What is revisionist about my posting? It is a fact that the Eagles quickly signed him to a very lucrative deal after the trade while the Bills refused to redo his below market contract. It is also a fact that the Bills are a consistently losing team and the Eagles are a consistently winning team. Do you deny that the Eagles are superior in making personnel decisions? Even the Bills front office would admit to that obvious fact. If you don't agree with that assessment then compare the records of the teams.

 

You are right about what is done is done. But as long as this mediocre organization takes a step forward and then two back the lousy results will continue.

[K-9]

What is revisionist about my posting? It is a fact that the Eagles quickly signed him to a very lucrative deal after the trade while the Bills refused to redo his below market contract. It is also a fact that the Bills are a consistently losing team and the Eagles are a consistently winning team. Do you deny that the Eagles are superior in making personnel decisions? Even the Bills front office would admit to that obvious fact. If you don't agree with that assessment then compare the records of the teams.

 

You are right about what is done is done. But as long as this mediocre organization takes a step forward and then two back the lousy results will continue.

 

The revisionist part is that which I highlighted from your post:

 

...while the Bills were adamant that they were not going to give him an upgraded contract...

 

That's simply not true. And that's all I'm disagreeing with you about. The Bills told him if he participated in the off-season

activities and report to camp on time they would renegotiate. Peters chose not to. The Bills' track record of renegotiating contracts with players who show up was/is well established. Peters chose a different route.

 

Fact of the matter is, he didn't want to play in Buffalo. I'll have to dig up the quote he gave the Philly papers not too long ago where he said that.

 

GO BILLS!!!

[BuffaloBill]

ouch ... too painful to watch that moobage.

[PDaDdy]

The revisionist part is that which I highlighted from your post:

 

...while the Bills were adamant that they were not going to give him an upgraded contract...

 

That's simply not true. And that's all I'm disagreeing with you about. The Bills told him if he participated in the off-season

activities and report to camp on time they would renegotiate. Peters chose not to. The Bills' track record of renegotiating contracts with players who show up was/is well established. Peters chose a different route.

 

Fact of the matter is, he didn't want to play in Buffalo. I'll have to dig up the quote he gave the Philly papers not too long ago where he said that.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

To be clear they said they would TALK if he reported. There was NO promise of a new contract, NOR the promise of a fair market value contract. The front office for whatever reasons, which perhaps they will only know 100%, let a young pro bowl LT tackle leave town.

[PDaDdy]

Hey just throwing this out there. What do we think the chances are that we resign Langston Walker after the first game? To my knowledge nobody has jumped on him yet or rung up his phone. Langston is not a LT but I was fine with him at RT. We could probably get him for a lot less money with no guaranteed year long contract if we resign him after Monday night.

[Sisyphean Bills]

Fact of the matter is, he didn't want to play in Buffalo. I'll have to dig up the quote he gave the Philly papers not too long ago where he said that.

 

What's curious: Melvin Fowler, I read in some report, basically went to the coaches last year and said he didn't want to play against the 3-4 defenses. So, they glued him to the bench. That has always struck me as, well, more than a little strange. He was the pivot on an offense that was 4-1, IIRC, at the time.

 

Peters said in a recent interview that he was so exasperated with the contract negotiations that he told his agent to tell the Bills he didn't want to hear any more offers. He was going to play out his contract and leave. At that same time, the Bills called and told him he was traded.

 

Now, there is this story that Dockery watched Redskins games on Monday, crying in his beer as he was handed his game check from the Bills.

 

Finally, we have the unexpected cut of Langston Walker. He sounded less than eager to be switching from RT to LT and his play in practice and pre-season has been labeled, "mailing it in".

 

That is 4 starters out of a unit of 5 that are gone and seemed, shall we say, less than gung-ho about playing for the Bills.

 

Maybe it is all just a coincidence...

[spartacus]

The revisionist part is that which I highlighted from your post:

 

...while the Bills were adamant that they were not going to give him an upgraded contract...

 

That's simply not true. And that's all I'm disagreeing with you about. The Bills told him if he participated in the off-season

activities and report to camp on time they would renegotiate. Peters chose not to. The Bills' track record of renegotiating contracts with players who show up was/is well established. Peters chose a different route.

 

Fact of the matter is, he didn't want to play in Buffalo. I'll have to dig up the quote he gave the Philly papers not too long ago where he said that.

 

GO BILLS!!!

 

in January 2008, when it mattered and when they could have easily made their best player happy,

Brandon point blank told Peters to stuff it and were adamant that they were not going to give him an upgraded contract... in 2008 since he had 3 years left on his contract.

 

if they rewarded their best player for pro bowl performance at this time, there would not have been a hold out.

 

in retrospect, this situation is too stupid to comprehend. The 2 guys that were getting megabucks that pushed Peters to ask for more money have now been cut outright savings tens of millions of $$$$. Of course, none of this money saved has been applied to fixing the LT hole, as the Bills are again employing the lowest paid LT in the league.

[spartacus]

What's curious: Melvin Fowler, I read in some report, basically went to the coaches last year and said he didn't want to play against the 3-4 defenses. So, they glued him to the bench. That has always struck me as, well, more than a little strange. He was the pivot on an offense that was 4-1, IIRC, at the time.

 

Peters said in a recent interview that he was so exasperated with the contract negotiations that he told his agent to tell the Bills he didn't want to hear any more offers. He was going to play out his contract and leave. At that same time, the Bills called and told him he was traded.

 

Now, there is this story that Dockery watched Redskins games on Monday, crying in his beer as he was handed his game check from the Bills.

 

Finally, we have the unexpected cut of Langston Walker. He sounded less than eager to be switching from RT to LT and his play in practice and pre-season has been labeled, "mailing it in".

 

That is 4 starters out of a unit of 5 that are gone and seemed, shall we say, less than gung-ho about playing for the Bills.

 

Maybe it is all just a coincidence...

 

and all of these players were happy the prior year under the tutelage of McNally.

 

Enter Turk (as OC) and Kugler(as OL coach) and everyone is running for the exits.

 

couldn't be the coaching or front office hi-jinx - -

must be the Flouride in the water in Buffalo

[rstencel]

in January 2008, when it mattered and when they could have easily made their best player happy,

Brandon point blank told Peters to stuff it and were adamant that they were not going to give him an upgraded contract... in 2008 since he had 3 years left on his contract.

 

if they rewarded their best player for pro bowl performance at this time, there would not have been a hold out.

 

in retrospect, this situation is too stupid to comprehend. The 2 guys that were getting megabucks that pushed Peters to ask for more money have now been cut outright savings tens of millions of $$$$. Of course, none of this money saved has been applied to fixing the LT hole, as the Bills are again employing the lowest paid LT in the league.

 

They have been on low end of pay scale for LT for several years. Not like anything has changed there.

[Doc]

I'll be watching the Eagles-Panthers game with great interest. Peppers on Peters. Should be interesting.

[Corp000085]

Hey, since Walker was so damn good, who picked him up this week?

[Tcali]

Hey, since Walker was so damn good, who picked him up this week?

Not a fair question because all teams are solid at O line

[Doc]

He'll probably be picked-up tomorrow.

[RayFinkle]

Hey, since Walker was so damn good, who picked him up this week?

Nobody is picking up anybody until after week 1. If they are signed before that, their contract is guaranteed. The same reason Runyan hasn't signed yet.

[Bad Lieutenant]

Langston is at it again.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kk3fm8buQw

[San Jose Bills Fan]

An excellent example of why youtube may actually suck I.Q. points out of your brain right through the internet.

So true Thurman. Sad and pathetic. Without the internet, the only way we'd hear about this guy is when they remove his dead body from the room he hasn't left in 20 years with a forklift.

I'm sure you saw what you saw but I would draw a different conclusion. I think you seeing him play differently is a reflection of his lack of ability to play LT. I also don't recall Langston saying he wasn't motivated to play LT I assume you are equating his lack of optimism with lack of trying. He was obviously not optimistic but I wouldn't be optimistic going into the ring with Mike Tyson. I just know I'm not the right guy for that job!

 

I'm sorry but it is just a complete fantasy that a significant contributing factor to his failure was lack of enthusiasm. The lack of enthusiasm was a symptom not the problem. HUGE difference.

I totally agree with this. He had an interview about one month ago and sounded "philosophical" about the switch. Now people are latching onto that trying to equate it with a lack of effort.

 

A few things we know about Langston. He went to Cal which is one of the top five Universities in the country. He graduated with a degree in economics. That's not possible as a student athlete unless you're a hard worker. He's traveled the world. He's an intelligent, articulate man who knows damn well he won the lottery when the Bills signed him. There was never a question of his attitude or effort before.

 

The Bills put him in a position to fail. They also scapegoated him.

 

He's an average right tackle with very little explosiveness. I don't think it's his weight. Very few football players 6'8" have explosion. The ones that do are freaks...exceptions. He's like the big guy on the basketball team who lumbers up and down the court, gets to one end and has to turn around because the play's going the other way. He's very limited as an athlete and I don't think losing weight would make any difference.

 

And this part is also true. Many people on this board thought he'd be adequate at LT. He played a bit last year and didn't embarrass himself. But he's not cut out for the position really and now he's gone.

 

He's not as horrible as some are saying and he's not as good as others were saying before. Symptomatic of our country, it's that inability for most people to see the truth which typically resides somewhere between the opposite extreme opinions. Most people unfortunately can only see black or white.

[Armchair GM]

Not a fair question because all teams are solid at O line

 

Tell that to the Steelers!

[supertutor13]

Cal-Berkeley is nowhere near one of the top 5 academic universities in the country. It is a university that has historically been the scene of political activism, but that does not make it a top 5 university

 

So true Thurman. Sad and pathetic. Without the internet, the only way we'd hear about this guy is when they remove his dead body from the room he hasn't left in 20 years with a forklift.

 

I totally agree with this. He had an interview about one month ago and sounded "philosophical" about the switch. Now people are latching onto that trying to equate it with a lack of effort.

 

A few things we know about Langston. He went to Cal which is one of the top five Universities in the country. He graduated with a degree in economics. That's not possible as a student athlete unless you're a hard worker. He's traveled the world. He's an intelligent, articulate man who knows damn well he won the lottery when the Bills signed him. There was never a question of his attitude or effort before.

 

The Bills put him in a position to fail. They also scapegoated him.

 

He's an average right tackle with very little explosiveness. I don't think it's his weight. Very few football players 6'8" have explosion. The ones that do are freaks...exceptions. He's like the big guy on the basketball team who lumbers up and down the court, gets to one end and has to turn around because the play's going the other way. He's very limited as an athlete and I don't think losing weight would make any difference.

 

And this part is also true. Many people on this board thought he'd be adequate at LT. He played a bit last year and didn't embarrass himself. But he's not cut out for the position really and now he's gone.

 

He's not as horrible as some are saying and he's not as good as others were saying before. Symptomatic of our country, it's that inability for most people to see the truth which typically resides somewhere between the opposite extreme opinions. Most people unfortunately can only see black or white.

[San Jose Bills Fan]

Cal-Berkeley is nowhere near one of the top 5 academic universities in the country. It is a university that has historically been the scene of political activism, but that does not make it a top 5 university

Dude, you could save a lot of unnecessarily used space if you cut only that part of the quote which you are responding to.

 

And yes, Cal-Berkeley is one of the top five schools in America, undergraduate, graduate, public or private.

 

http://www.learn4good.com/top10/universities.htm

 

This particular study shows it is one of the top five worldwide. I could cite several other sources also...but why should I do the work for you?

[San Jose Bills Fan]

http://www.arwu.org/rank/2005/ARWU2005_TopAmer.htm

[GaryPinC]

and all of these players were happy the prior year under the tutelage of McNally.

 

Enter Turk (as OC) and Kugler(as OL coach) and everyone is running for the exits.

 

couldn't be the coaching or front office hi-jinx - -

must be the Flouride in the water in Buffalo

 

 

Can't say I was ever very impressed with the O-line play under McNally. Between having mostly inadequate centers, Walker who was never that highly regarded when he was brought from Oakland, Dockery who left his heart in DC, and Peters who couldn't believe he was making less to much less than the rest of these immobile turds, the magnitude of the last few years' O-line problems is completely obvious.

 

I don't think it's McNally's fault. It seems like he did favor those roadgrader-type lineman, the FO just never got in guys with the proper motivation and/or talent.

 

It's obvious Kugler favors more mobile, slightly smaller guys with a nasty attitude. After watching the NE game, especially on a screen pass when Hangartner got out in space and basically layed out to make a block on a defender to spring Freddy, I'm very much liking this O-line.

 

I think Kugler wanted this group of guys together and so guys like Langston/Dockery may have gotten screwed a bit.

 

But where was Vince Wilfork in that game? This O-line has a ways to go to become a cohesive, dominant unit but I feel more optimistic about them then I have in at least the last 5 years. They at least seem to have a high sense of pride in doing their job well.

[San Jose Bills Fan]

Well stated GaryPinc

[BillsWatch]

I think Kugler wanted this group of guys together and so guys like Langston/Dockery may have gotten screwed a bit.

 

Langston maybe but Dockery? He got a huge signing bonus and got paid again by Washington. Bills could have released later, could have publicly questioned his work ethic, etc. Charley Casserly mentioned Dockery was studying game tape every Monday - Washington's game tape. As demonstrated by Dockery's public comments his heart was not in Buffalo even when wallet was.

[rstencel]

So true Thurman. Sad and pathetic. Without the internet, the only way we'd hear about this guy is when they remove his dead body from the room he hasn't left in 20 years with a forklift.

 

I totally agree with this. He had an interview about one month ago and sounded "philosophical" about the switch. Now people are latching onto that trying to equate it with a lack of effort.

 

A few things we know about Langston. He went to Cal which is one of the top five Universities in the country. He graduated with a degree in economics. That's not possible as a student athlete unless you're a hard worker. He's traveled the world. He's an intelligent, articulate man who knows damn well he won the lottery when the Bills signed him. There was never a question of his attitude or effort before.

 

The Bills put him in a position to fail. They also scapegoated him.

 

He's an average right tackle with very little explosiveness. I don't think it's his weight. Very few football players 6'8" have explosion. The ones that do are freaks...exceptions. He's like the big guy on the basketball team who lumbers up and down the court, gets to one end and has to turn around because the play's going the other way. He's very limited as an athlete and I don't think losing weight would make any difference.

 

And this part is also true. Many people on this board thought he'd be adequate at LT. He played a bit last year and didn't embarrass himself. But he's not cut out for the position really and now he's gone.

 

He's not as horrible as some are saying and he's not as good as others were saying before. Symptomatic of our country, it's that inability for most people to see the truth which typically resides somewhere between the opposite extreme opinions. Most people unfortunately can only see black or white.

 

While what you say about his effort issue makes sense, I don't think being asked to do something outside your comfort level is a reason to go public with your complaints about being asked to do it, or to not finish your blocks or show any hustle on the field.

 

Still think lack of hustle and openly complaining about being asked to move outside his comfort zone played a part in his being cut, as opposed to giving him a chance to move back to RT. Having the OC change probably played a big part in it as well.

 

If he was unhappy with the move, and due to that didn't give full effort because of that, then he should be cut, as is a young line around him, and they learn from the Vets.

[supertutor13]

How about this annually highly respected source...it ranks Cal-Berkeley #36 worldwide, #18 in the US and #4 in California...quite a bit away from top #5 in the US

 

http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/w...ollege-rankings

 

Dude, you could save a lot of unnecessarily used space if you cut only that part of the quote which you are responding to.

 

And yes, Cal-Berkeley is one of the top five schools in America, undergraduate, graduate, public or private.

 

http://www.learn4good.com/top10/universities.htm

 

This particular study shows it is one of the top five worldwide. I could cite several other sources also...but why should I do the work for you?

[Meathead]

is anyone else turned on?

[MattM]

How about this annually highly respected source...it ranks Cal-Berkeley #36 worldwide, #18 in the US and #4 in California...quite a bit away from top #5 in the US

 

http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/w...ollege-rankings

 

And your point is? It's a fact that Cal is one of the best schools in the US, especially if you measure bang for your buck, it being a public school and all. Personally, I'd say that UCLA doesn't belong anywhere near ahead of Berkeley, but that's just me (and my in-laws, UCLA alums both, will have my hide for saying that).

 

Walker, too, is a smart guy, there's no doubt about that. Perhaps a bit too smart to buy into some of the rah rah aspects of the NFL--he may prefer to cash a paycheck while expending minimal effort to earn same and with minimal impact on his long-term health prospects that the League can cause. Just ask Kyle Turley, the latest victim of the long-term effects of playing in the NFL as per Florio yesterday.....