Jump to content

Turner likely to stay in SD


jri111

Recommended Posts

Artcile in the Tennesseean today: http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar.../704170375/1027

 

 

"As of right now, it looks like Michael is going to be in San Diego,'' Cook said. "Things could change, and it could happen on draft day, too.''

 

"I don't think that is going to happen either,'' Cook said of Buffalo. "I don't know what is going to happen. Nothing is happening right now, though.''

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, then AJ is going to lose him for nothing next season

 

I think its obvious that as of right now he will be in SD cause no team wants to pay what SD wants. His agent isn't really giving much insight besides right now he's a Charger and may end up staying a Charger unless something happens in the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine Turner or his agent are happy about this, especially with the amount of coin being thrown around this off season.

I don't know about that, usually prices go up every year, sure alot has been spent this offseason on mediocre players, but if the cap goes up again (like it probably will) think of what he could get next year if he shows just a little bit more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine Turner or his agent are happy about this, especially with the amount of coin being thrown around this off season.

 

I don't know if its really that bad of a deal for him. With contracts escalating the way they are, he may actually make $5-10 million more by waiting a year. Injury is a threat, of course, but as a backup carrying who has gotten less than 100 carries each year, his odds of making it through the season are pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about that, usually prices go up every year, sure alot has been spent this offseason on mediocre players, but if the cap goes up again (like it probably will) think of what he could get next year if he shows just a little bit more

 

He plays RB. They have a genuine opportunity to get injured on every single play. I don't think RB's like the idea of 'waiting until next year' to sign their extension. Even RB's who get franchised make good coin for one year, but are risking A LOT more coin because of the injury potential while playing out that one-year franchise contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't be happy. He'll get maybe a little bit more next year than he would have this year, but he's missing-out on about $3M extra this year by playing under the RFA tender.

 

He can stay in SD if they won't budge on a 1st rounder. Then they'll lose him next year for nothing and it will have been all for naught, since they won't be winning the SB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about that, usually prices go up every year, sure alot has been spent this offseason on mediocre players, but if the cap goes up again (like it probably will) think of what he could get next year if he shows just a little bit more

Think of what could happen if he rips his knee up during the first preseason game. All he can count on is his signing bonus, and that would go in the crapper if he received a serious injury. Kind of like a bird in the hand being worth $18M while the two in the bush may be singing an entirely different tune.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He plays RB. They have a genuine opportunity to get injured on every single play. I don't think RB's like the idea of 'waiting until next year' to sign their extension. Even RB's who get franchised make good coin for one year, but are risking A LOT more coin because of the injury potential while playing out that one-year franchise contract.

 

He's definitely not going to like it, but at the same time, he's right. Turner could potentially benefit from this a year down the road. In fact, teams may be willing to pay him a LOT more money knowing that they also don't have to give up a draft pick in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gaurantee a draft day trade will get done with someone. No way AJ will let him go free next year and he is not going to franchise a backup RB. they will lower there asking price and someone will jump on him. Dont be surprised if the Giants take a stab at him during the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like just the type of thing one would say if you were hoping to move a team that refused to part with a 1st for you off the dime to get them to budge (this is where I think the Bills are) or alternately it may be a last gasp attempt by Turner's folks to get the Bills to budge before he and SD give up and take a second.

 

I hope Marv holds out unless SD caves and if they do not, he trades down from #12 (now or on draft day as I think the team is better in 07 if it trades down for additional 1st day picks even if Peterson or Willis were to drop to #12 for them. Peterson and Willis both have significant upside if they work out, but the draft is simply too big of a crapshoot to bank on either of these two players working out for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He plays RB. They have a genuine opportunity to get injured on every single play. I don't think RB's like the idea of 'waiting until next year' to sign their extension. Even RB's who get franchised make good coin for one year, but are risking A LOT more coin because of the injury potential while playing out that one-year franchise contract.

Any player risks injury on every play, Some even risk injury at home in the offseason. But he is a backup RB who doesn't get more then 100 carries a year. If he takes another year to show he can be a starter he will then have the chance to chose whatever team he wants (not just one thats willing to trade, for the most money he can get in a market where prices will have gone up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gaurantee a draft day trade will get done with someone. No way AJ will let him go free next year and he is not going to franchise a backup RB. they will lower there asking price and someone will jump on him. Dont be surprised if the Giants take a stab at him during the draft.

 

Why trade a player who does a very good job at filling a vital role on the team for a 2nd round draft pick that may not be able to contribute immediately?

 

AJ Smith isn't going to lower his asking price, nor should he. Turner's value to the Chargers is greater than his value to the teams interested in trading for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like just the type of thing one would say if you were hoping to move a team that refused to part with a 1st for you off the dime to get them to budge (this is where I think the Bills are) or alternately it may be a last gasp attempt by Turner's folks to get the Bills to budge before he and SD give up and take a second.

 

I hope Marv holds out unless SD caves and if they do not, he trades down from #12 (now or on draft day as I think the team is better in 07 if it trades down for additional 1st day picks even if Peterson or Willis were to drop to #12 for them. Peterson and Willis both have significant upside if they work out, but the draft is simply too big of a crapshoot to bank on either of these two players working out for sure.

 

This draft is so weak that only about 18 players carry real 1st round grades.

 

The Bills have a chance to get one at #12.

 

Why would they give up a likely starter for multiple back up / scrubs in a weak draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why trade a player who does a very good job at filling a vital role on the team for a 2nd round draft pick that may not be able to contribute immediately?

 

AJ Smith isn't going to lower his asking price, nor should he. Turner's value to the Chargers is greater than his value to the teams interested in trading for him.

That's not true. he could be very valuable to the Bills, Titans, Packers or another team. A serviceable back-up could keep the Chargers on basically the same level. Unless, he is a top five or so back in the league, the Chargers arent winning the SB without LT.

 

I agree that AJ doesn't have to trade him and won't for a crappy deal just so he gets something. I just think it's coming down to the wire and it's extremely difficult for the Bills or Titans as well as the Chargers to know just how far to go without going over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why trade a player who does a very good job at filling a vital role on the team for a 2nd round draft pick that may not be able to contribute immediately?

 

AJ Smith isn't going to lower his asking price, nor should he. Turner's value to the Chargers is greater than his value to the teams interested in trading for him.

 

 

why trade Turner now?

 

because Turner's value will never be higher after his highlight reel 2006.

 

If he's actually does have to play significant time for LT in 2007, whatever warts he has will be exposed and his value will drop.

 

SD knows what they have in him and he is worth more to them than anyone else due to tight window to challenge for a Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an agent talking. That usually means six things:

 

He is being honest or totally full of crap.

 

He is trying to deflate interest in a trade or inflate interest for his client.

 

The trade is closer than ever or further than ever.

A most quintessential fair and balanced post! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why trade a player who does a very good job at filling a vital role on the team for a 2nd round draft pick that may not be able to contribute immediately?

 

AJ Smith isn't going to lower his asking price, nor should he. Turner's value to the Chargers is greater than his value to the teams interested in trading for him.

 

But it wont be in a year. So what you have Turner for one more year then he leaves and you get shiit for home. Only one guy can carry the ball at one time, they can find a very capable RB to spell LT when he needs it. granted he might not be as good as Turner but none the less it makes sense to get what you can. Who knows the pick they trade for could be a huge difference maker. SD needs WR's badly and another corner to go with Cromartie on the other side. It makes alot of sense to let him walk after a year and get absolutely nothing when teams are offering 2nd round picks.

 

Smith is waiting to see what he can get in the draft. He is a smart guy and knows that this years class is fairly weak and Turner could be a desperation choice for some teams in need of a RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not true. he could be very valuable to the Bills, Titans, Packers or another team. A serviceable back-up could keep the Chargers on basically the same level. Unless, he is a top five or so back in the league, the Chargers arent winning the SB without LT.

 

I agree that AJ doesn't have to trade him and won't for a crappy deal just so he gets something. I just think it's coming down to the wire and it's extremely difficult for the Bills or Titans as well as the Chargers to know just how far to go without going over.

 

Yes, a serviceable back-up could adequately replace Turner, but that's the problem. There are absolutely no guarantees that the Chargers can find a serviceable backup. And in what round do they have to draft him? Its a pretty questionable trade for the Chargers if they gain a 2nd from Turner, only to have to turn around and use a 2nd-4th on a totally unproven rookie to replace him. It only makes sense for the Chargers to take that risk if they reasonably believe that doing so can make a dramatic upgrade to their team in 2007. That's why AJ seems to be insisting on a #1 and rightfully so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This draft is so weak that only about 18 players carry real 1st round grades.

 

The Bills have a chance to get one at #12.

 

Why would they give up a likely starter for multiple back up / scrubs in a weak draft?

 

The problem is that even of the best 18 there few are really all that great.

 

Even in a draft with a lot talent (by most folks estimate) like last year, the 1st round was far from a certainty in terms of the choices being definite great players.

 

The facts simply are that of the 32 first round choices in what was viewed as a pretty strong draft my review a couple of weeks ago found that only 18 of these players were first on their team's depth chart at their position.

 

The conventional wisdom is that the 1st round of a draft should produce a player who will contribute as a starter his first year and if one does it right will be an immediate starter if he is a top 10 choice. The reality was that this proved to be true even in last year's fairly strong draft to be true a bit above 50% of the time.

 

Particularly at LB where this class overall looks fairly weak with none of the players (Willis being the best of them) is seen as a consensus choice to be a top 10 player, this draft unfortunately looks too much like a crap shoot.

 

What are the Bills to do? How do we choose in the quantity versus quality quandary?

 

My sense is that the obvious answer is that you try to go for both. The top grade talent at both RB and LB have too many limitations for us to bank on them as would be required if we invest everything in them.

 

None of the 1B choices look all that strong, but then neither do the 1A choices so if we can trade down and get two 1Bs to compete against each other, this strikes me as a far better strategy than simply assuming that any of the 1As (Peterson and Willis) will work out for sure.

 

Even IF either of these players are as good as advertised, the possibility of injury which wrecks our season are too high.

 

Even IF either of these players ultimately turn out to be multi-time Pro Bowl quality, this may be that their course to glory is like that of a Larry Johnson and his first two years before he starts his Pro Bowl run were pretty unproductive.

 

It is not so much that I have faith in any specific players it that I do have more faith in competition than I do in any specific players. Even of they are good there is simply too much that can go wrong for us to bet the ranch and the dog on either Peterson or Willis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it wont be in a year. So what you have Turner for one more year then he leaves and you get shiit for home. Only one guy can carry the ball at one time, they can find a very capable RB to spell LT when he needs it. granted he might not be as good as Turner but none the less it makes sense to get what you can. Who knows the pick they trade for could be a huge difference maker. SD needs WR's badly and another corner to go with Cromartie on the other side. It makes alot of sense to let him walk after a year and get absolutely nothing when teams are offering 2nd round picks.

 

Smith is waiting to see what he can get in the draft. He is a smart guy and knows that this years class is fairly weak and Turner could be a desperation choice for some teams in need of a RB.

 

You're right about one thing. His value to the Chargers next year will next to nothing (they rarely sign FAs and probably will get an '09 compensatory for him). But the Chargers are a Super Bowl contending team NOW. They don't need draft picks. They need players they can rely on this upcoming season.

 

Additionally, if this is such a weak RB class (and I believe it is), Turner becomes even more valuable to the Chargers as it would seem to be more difficult to replace him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's definitely not going to like it, but at the same time, he's right. Turner could potentially benefit from this a year down the road. In fact, teams may be willing to pay him a LOT more money knowing that they also don't have to give up a draft pick in the process.

 

I don't know...there are supposed to be a lot of good to great backs coming out next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He plays RB. They have a genuine opportunity to get injured on every single play. I don't think RB's like the idea of 'waiting until next year' to sign their extension. Even RB's who get franchised make good coin for one year, but are risking A LOT more coin because of the injury potential while playing out that one-year franchise contract.

 

I totally agree with this. Turner could cut wrong in a non contact drill in training camp & blowout his knee. Why would you want to wait a year when if traded a guaranteed 17-20 million is likely sitting on the table for you this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know...there are supposed to be a lot of good to great backs coming out next year.

 

Possibly, but as I remind everyone that touts the '08 RB class, its almost entirely reliant upon juniors declaring themselves eligible. Its also dependent upon those guys having good seasons and staying healthy. None of that is a given and these classes that look great a year out have often evaporated by the time the draft actually occurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are always looking for the bad guy and the fool but there really doesn't appear to be one here. The simple fact appears to me that Michael Turner is a very good RB prospect, worth somewhere between the first and second round. He's quite valuable to both the team that has him and the teams that want him. Everyone is trying to put a monetary/draft pick value on him, an inexact science, and they're all pretty close to each other. The Chargers are asking for the most, hoping for something close, unwilling at something too far away. The Bills and Titans are mirror opposites. None of the teams have to make this move. It's becoming more likely to me that something creative, a combination of choices in this draft and next year's draft will eventually be what two teams can settle on, save face, and make it worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what makes absolutely no sense to me? "AJ The Godlike" insists that six teams are interested and he's not budging from his 1st and 3rd, despite being open to creative ways to meeting those demands. Then, a moment later in the same interview, he says this:

“If nothing happens, I'm perfectly happy to have Michael return here at $2.35 (million),” Smith says. “He'll be a backup here and kick returner. People say A.J.'s stupid to bring him back and (eventually) let him walk. The league probably will throw me a No. 4 (compensatory pick) if that happens. I'll take a 4.

 

I don't get it, AJ. You'll take a 4, but you won't back down off your 1st and 3rd?

 

I've always like AJ, but he's starting to believe his own press ("If you want what he's got, don't plan on robbery. Isn't going to happen while The Duke's wearing the badge and holding the ace.") and I have to admit he's starting to sound a bit stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what makes absolutely no sense to me? "AJ The Godlike" insists that six teams are interested and he's not budging from his 1st and 3rd, despite being open to creative ways to meeting those demands. Then, a moment later in the same interview, he says this:

“If nothing happens, I'm perfectly happy to have Michael return here at $2.35 (million),” Smith says. “He'll be a backup here and kick returner. People say A.J.'s stupid to bring him back and (eventually) let him walk. The league probably will throw me a No. 4 (compensatory pick) if that happens. I'll take a 4.

 

I don't get it, AJ. You'll take a 4, but you won't back down off your 1st and 3rd?

 

I've always like AJ, but he's starting to believe his own press ("If you want what he's got, don't plan on robbery. Isn't going to happen while The Duke's wearing the badge and holding the ace.") and I have to admit he's starting to sound a bit stupid.

I think he's being pretty straight forward here. He's already said numerous times that he will accept less than first and third, but is holding out for a #1 at this time. People are apparently offering him a #2 which he at this time is unwilling to agree to. The choice of getting a 2 or a 3 and losing Turner this year is not worth it to him, as opposed to keeping Turner this year and getting a #4. That makes perfect sense to me, and is probably true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The choice of getting a 2 or a 3 and losing Turner this year is not worth it to him, as opposed to keeping Turner this year and getting a #4. That makes perfect sense to me, and is probably true.

It just doesn't make sense to me, but I don't do this for a living, so my opinion is pretty lame. I suspect beneath all of this is a GM who knows there is a very, very good chance that before this season ramps up, someone will be in desperate need for a running back and won't have a choice but to meet his requirements to fill an unexpected hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what makes absolutely no sense to me? "AJ The Godlike" insists that six teams are interested and he's not budging from his 1st and 3rd, despite being open to creative ways to meeting those demands. Then, a moment later in the same interview, he says this:

“If nothing happens, I'm perfectly happy to have Michael return here at $2.35 (million),” Smith says. “He'll be a backup here and kick returner. People say A.J.'s stupid to bring him back and (eventually) let him walk. The league probably will throw me a No. 4 (compensatory pick) if that happens. I'll take a 4.

 

I don't get it, AJ. You'll take a 4, but you won't back down off your 1st and 3rd?

 

I've always like AJ, but he's starting to believe his own press ("If you want what he's got, don't plan on robbery. Isn't going to happen while The Duke's wearing the badge and holding the ace.") and I have to admit he's starting to sound a bit stupid.

 

What he means is he gets Turner as insurance for one year and then will get a fourth rounder. If he settles for a second rounder this year the two round fall is worth the insurance policy. He's doing the smart thing. There is always someone willing to pay way too much. Cough, does anyone remember a guy called RJ, Cough, cough!! This actually helps Buffalo because the high second round pick is what Buffalo owns. Now if one of the other four teams, that may or may not exist, has a higher pick then they might lose and if not they might win Turner.

 

TSN's draft guide give the RB position in this draft an A- and Lindy's gives it a B. Not too bad. Personally I would avoid Peterson and Lynch. They aren't first rounders IMO. Peterson because he's brittle and Lynch because of character problems.

 

The second round is where the gems of this draft are. Last Year Maurice Jones-Drew was a second rounder. Jerious Norwood was a third rounder. Leon Washington a fourth rounder.

 

The best depth in this draft for RB's is second round. Brian Leonard (my favorite in this draft), Antonio Pittman and Kenny Irons carry second round grades.

 

The teams that need RB's are; Buffalo, Browns, Houston, Tenessee, Oakland, Green Bay, Arizona.

 

6 teams other than Buffalo. The Browns have Lewis but he's only a short term answer. They may wait til next year to take a back. It also depends on how much faith Oakland has in Jordan for this year. They may be willing to wait until next year. Green Bay is definitely going for one. Houston, I believe, will grab Peterson. Tenessee definitely wants one and Arizona may be willing to wait another year.

 

So let's say Houston grabs Peterson and Green Bay takes Marshawn Lynch. Now only four teams need a RB. The mock drafts I've seen have the Browns and Oakland passing on a RB in the second round. I believe, and hope that Leonard will be there and I think Buffalo will have taken the best back in the draft. The other possibility is that SD sees it's opportunity slipping away and trades Turner for Buffalo's second rounder. I'd rather have that than Leonard but not by much.

 

If the Browns and Oakland take RB's then one of the backs I listed will be left for Buffalo. Things aren't as dire as they seem. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What he means is he gets Turner as insurance for one year and then will get a fourth rounder. If he settles for a second rounder this year the two round fall is worth the insurance policy. He's doing the smart thing. There is always someone willing to pay way too much. Cough, does anyone remember a guy called RJ, Cough, cough!! This actually helps Buffalo because the high second round pick is what Buffalo owns. Now if one of the other four teams, that may or may not exist, has a higher pick then they might lose and if not they might win Turner.

 

TSN's draft guide give the RB position in this draft an A- and Lindy's gives it a B. Not too bad. Personally I would avoid Peterson and Lynch. They aren't first rounders IMO. Peterson because he's brittle and Lynch because of character problems.

 

The second round is where the gems of this draft are. Last Year Maurice Jones-Drew was a second rounder. Jerious Norwood was a third rounder. Leon Washington a fourth rounder.

 

The best depth in this draft for RB's is second round. Brian Leonard (my favorite in this draft), Antonio Pittman and Kenny Irons carry second round grades.

 

The teams that need RB's are; Buffalo, Browns, Houston, Tenessee, Oakland, Green Bay, Arizona.

 

6 teams other than Buffalo. The Browns have Lewis but he's only a short term answer. They may wait til next year to take a back. It also depends on how much faith Oakland has in Jordan for this year. They may be willing to wait until next year. Green Bay is definitely going for one. Houston, I believe, will grab Peterson. Tenessee definitely wants one and Arizona may be willing to wait another year.

 

So let's say Houston grabs Peterson and Green Bay takes Marshawn Lynch. Now only four teams need a RB. The mock drafts I've seen have the Browns and Oakland passing on a RB in the second round. I believe, and hope that Leonard will be there and I think Buffalo will have taken the best back in the draft. The other possibility is that SD sees it's opportunity slipping away and trades Turner for Buffalo's second rounder. I'd rather have that than Leonard but not by much.

 

If the Browns and Oakland take RB's then one of the backs I listed will be left for Buffalo. Things aren't as dire as they seem. :lol:

 

I wopuld prefer to have Brandon Jackson as an everydown back with upside or Lorenzo Booker as a 3rd down homerun hitter rather than the 2nd tier backs listed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wopuld prefer to have Brandon Jackson as an everydown back with upside or Lorenzo Booker as a 3rd down homerun hitter rather than the 2nd tier backs listed.

 

If Michael Bush is available in the fifth round no matter what Buffalo has done at RB they should take him. It sounds unlikely he'll be there but with his recent second surgery he may well be. If he comes back strong they may be able to trade him for a higher draft pick.

 

Jackson is ok but Leonard is 4"'s taller and runs the same 40. He also is a great team leader who oozes character and smart. He is the most versatile back in the draft.

 

Booker wasn't even good enough to start in college. He shared carries. A seventh rounder in my opinion that will be taken long before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone wants to be a stand-up "character guy," but why isn't Turner and his agent crying for a trade like everyone else in the NFL? I just find it weird. We have people making over 8 million per year crying for trades. Turner will be making 2.5 million next year, but this is only a 1 year contract. Just like everyone else with a 1 year contract, he is one injury away from being out of the NFL. Why isn't Turner pleading for a trade? He could be looking at a least a $30 million contract over multiple years and would be set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone wants to be a stand-up "character guy," but why isn't Turner and his agent crying for a trade like everyone else in the NFL? I just find it weird. We have people making over 8 million per year crying for trades. Turner will be making 2.5 million next year, but this is only a 1 year contract. Just like everyone else with a 1 year contract, he is one injury away from being out of the NFL. Why isn't Turner pleading for a trade? He could be looking at a least a $30 million contract over multiple years and would be set.

So let the high character bum :lol: stay there! we already have a very good back up form a great runner, why don't we go and take AP? forget about his ?'s on injuries, last time we drafted a "bum knee" guy from Oklahoma we fared pretty well if I rememeber right... :lol:

Go Bills!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This draft is so weak that only about 18 players carry real 1st round grades.

 

The Bills have a chance to get one at #12.

 

Why would they give up a likely starter for multiple back up / scrubs in a weak draft?

 

Just cause a player doesn't have a 1st rd grade doesn't mean they're a scrub. There are plenty of starters to be found in later rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just cause a player doesn't have a 1st rd grade doesn't mean they're a scrub. There are plenty of starters to be found in later rounds.

 

I think that's probably true this year, but lets not forget the 2000 draft. Everyone remembers that draft for being terrible for the Bills, but that draft was a turd almost from start to finish. There were a few good players after the middle of R2, but they were few and far between. Those drafts happen about once every decade or so, and while I don't think that this draft sucks THAT bad, its probably the weakest since that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...