JStranger76 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Sure, mistakes will be made, but this would solve a lot of uncertainty going into next year. Sorry, I'll talk needs and next year all I want. If this line- up shows promise, DT will be the obvious top need going into next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 If a move like this is to be made, don't you think it should at least be after the bye? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typical TBD Guy Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Sure, mistakes will be made, but this would solve a lot of uncertainty going into next year. Sorry, I'll talk needs and next year all I want. If this line- up shows promise, DT will be the obvious top need going into next year. 486380[/snapback] That is EXACTLY what I've been thinking for the past two weeks. We need to see what we've got with Peters and Preston, and guard may be a position better suited for Mr. Gandy. Anderson and Teague will not be on this roster next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted October 25, 2005 Author Share Posted October 25, 2005 It would be great Bill! The perfect time actually. Too bad we know it won't happen though. I'd probably leave Teague at center fpr now though, and maybe rotate Preston in with Gandy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 I agree with the above lineup, except that I'd insert Geisinger in Villy's place. Might as well go with the youth movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 if we do this...which i wouldnt mind seeing i may add, then we better be starting JP as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 I am not necessarily opposed to this potential move, but when did we experts determine that Bennie was the sole cause of our offensive line woes? Given I have seen some attrocious pass blocking from the guy, but I've also seen that from each of the other 4. They seem to take turns. Plus , atleast this season, Anderson has been a very good run blocker. I'm not saying that makes him great but I'm just trying to be careful that we aren't making assumptions here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted October 25, 2005 Author Share Posted October 25, 2005 I'm not completly down on Anderson, only he may be the odd man out if we go for long term potential. I wouldn't mind him staying in with Preston relieving Teague and Gandy with Anderson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Peters isn't ready to start in the NFL, probably never will. However, if we want to see Preston get reps at center and Gandy at guard, just kick Teague out to LT and replace Bennie with Gandy. Then we draft best LT available-which at the rate we're going is going to be the best LT in the draft to replace Teague. Meanwhile, Peters sits & the QB doesn't get killed. I seriously doubt Peters will ever be a full time starter on the OL. What's wrong with him being what he is-a good roll player & special teams demon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 I agree with the above lineup, except that I'd insert Geisinger in Villy's place. Might as well go with the youth movement. Actually, when healthy, Villy can play. I'd put Geisinger in for Gandy. Gandu is a backup T, nothing more. Anderson is a fat tub of goo. Teague is awful. LT - Peters LG - Geisinger C - Preston RG - Villy RT - MW Lets see what we have over the next 8 games. Play JP, Parrish, Evans etc. This may actually be done over the bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smuvtalker Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 I'd love to see Peters given a shot at the LT position. But they need to make up their mind and decide what they want him to be...stick with that and let him learn it to the fullest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB2004 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Sure, mistakes will be made, but this would solve a lot of uncertainty going into next year. Sorry, I'll talk needs and next year all I want. If this line- up shows promise, DT will be the obvious top need going into next year. 486380[/snapback] I'm going to say say Left tackle or possibly center. Defensive Tackle would be a close second. I think we need to let im Anderson play a little bit more to see how good he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 if we do this...which i wouldnt mind seeing i may add, then we better be starting JP as well... I agree. I was for Holcomb...when I thought his veteran experience could help win games like those against the Raiders. Maybe I'm being too harsh on Holcomb, but might as well see what we've got in JP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 If a move like this is to be made, don't you think it should at least be after the bye? 486384[/snapback] God, I hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Someone explain to me why other teams crap on our defense using max protect schemes (they pound it right down our throat), yet we can't line up max protect (w/Peters as an extra lineman/TE) and do anything. WHY IS EVERYTHING ALWAYS SO MUCH MORE DIFFICULT FOR THIS TEAM? We can't EVER pick up a yard on a 3rd or 4th-and-1 situation. FUG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Sure, mistakes will be made, but this would solve a lot of uncertainty going into next year. Sorry, I'll talk needs and next year all I want. If this line- up shows promise, DT will be the obvious top need going into next year. 486380[/snapback] No concerns about getting the qb's killed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 WHY IS EVERYTHING ALWAYS SO MUCH MORE DIFFICULT FOR THIS TEAM? We can't EVER pick up a yard on a 3rd or 4th-and-1 situation. FUG. 486677[/snapback] But can give a 15 yard run on a 3rd and 15..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobblehead Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 But can give a 15 yard run on a 3rd and 15..... 486987[/snapback] Immediately after giving up a 3rd and 10, only to get a temporary break with a holding call. Yeah, that happened last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Sure, mistakes will be made, but this would solve a lot of uncertainty going into next year. Sorry, I'll talk needs and next year all I want. If this line- up shows promise, DT will be the obvious top need going into next year. 486380[/snapback] I like it but lets make that change AFTER NE game and put JP in at QB. Worht seeing if McNally can work with this group. I am all for the youth move,ment screw Moulds and some of the other vets that think we have aplayoff chance we need to build for the SB not just making the damn playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I like it but lets make that change AFTER NE game and put JP in at QB. Worht seeing if McNally can work with this group. I am all for the youth move,ment screw Moulds and some of the other vets that think we have aplayoff chance we need to build for the SB not just making the damn playoffs 487012[/snapback] I say put JP in NOW!!!!!. After all, is MM all for that 2% edge we get when we do not announce our starters . Just think of the edge we would have if JP started, or even better shane, or even better Rohan Davey, who was in the other day for tryout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts