Doc Brown Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Everyone knew. Even someone with half a brain could see he was slowly slipping cognitively since 1973.
Big Blitz Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago 37 minutes ago, stevestojan said: BDS is strong in this forum. You all know you won, right? And you also know that most of us on the left (not the far left weirdos) have eyes and ears and could see he was as sharp as a cue ball. This isn’t about Biden. It’s about the media. We are driving final nails in coffins. 2
Doc Brown Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 44 minutes ago, stevestojan said: BDS is strong in this forum. You all know you won, right? And you also know that most of us on the left (not the far left weirdos) have eyes and ears and could see he was as sharp as a cue ball. Yeah. The voters didn't fall for it. I do wish his scumbag son though wasn't pardoned given Biden wasn't mentally fit to pardon anyone.
JDHillFan Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) Not that there’s anything wrong with that. For the Biden is irrelevant people - it is Joe that is responsible for the bad orange man being in charge for the next 44 months. Hang in there! Edited 7 hours ago by JDHillFan
nedboy7 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Poor Biden. Leave that half dead old man alone! What a giant stain on the Dems. 3 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Yeah. The voters didn't fall for it. I do wish his scumbag son though wasn't pardoned given Biden wasn't mentally fit to pardon anyone. After the Jan 6 pardons that’s some clueless comment Edited 4 hours ago by nedboy7 1
Doc Brown Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 7 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Poor Biden. Leave that half dead old man alone! What a giant stain on the Dems. After the Jan 6 pardons that’s some clueless comment I didn't agree with those one's either. Founding father's screwed that one up as they should've anticipated the potential for a president to abuse that power.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: I didn't agree with those one's either. Founding father's screwed that one up as they should've anticipated the potential for a president to abuse that power. I was all for the prosecution of J6 perpetrators, however, there were more than a few stories of prosecutorial overreach. The Dems pressed the advantage they had, looking to make a statement by hunting down everyone they possibly could find. I think most reasonable Americans look at the way liberals generally approach crime (soft on perps, hard on LEOs), say the way low level offenders were tracked down and rejected the approach. Put another way, I think most people that are victims of crime would appreciate the time/effort/commitment the Biden DOJ spent on tracking down and overcharging low level offenders, but realize the hypocrisy in play. I think it mattered in November, and mattered beyond people who identify as MAGA voters. So, pardons were appropriate for some, not for more violent offenders. 1
Homelander Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 32 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I was all for the prosecution of J6 perpetrators, however, there were more than a few stories of prosecutorial overreach. The Dems pressed the advantage they had, looking to make a statement by hunting down everyone they possibly could find. I think most reasonable Americans look at the way liberals generally approach crime (soft on perps, hard on LEOs), say the way low level offenders were tracked down and rejected the approach. Put another way, I think most people that are victims of crime would appreciate the time/effort/commitment the Biden DOJ spent on tracking down and overcharging low level offenders, but realize the hypocrisy in play. I think it mattered in November, and mattered beyond people who identify as MAGA voters. So, pardons were appropriate for some, not for more violent offenders. The classic "I'm all for accountability but" routine where suddenly prosecuting people who stormed the Capitol, beat cops with flagpoles, and tried to stop an election is seen as “overreach.” Funny how you're worried about "overreach," but I bet you didn’t flinch when Trump handed $30 million to Ashli Babbitt’s family - someone who was killed while storming the Capitol. Actions have consequences, but I guess they only count when it’s not your side breaking the law. 1 1
Motorin' Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 4 hours ago, Big Blitz said: I met with a colleague today who I respect very much on a personal and professional level. But she has had a terminal case of TDS for a while. I learned that Trump has advanced dementia and is so far along that he probably will need to be committed to a nursing home before the mid-terms. Joe Biden, however, is fit as a fiddle and would be doing fine this term... 2
Doc Brown Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 38 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I was all for the prosecution of J6 perpetrators, however, there were more than a few stories of prosecutorial overreach. The Dems pressed the advantage they had, looking to make a statement by hunting down everyone they possibly could find. I think most reasonable Americans look at the way liberals generally approach crime (soft on perps, hard on LEOs), say the way low level offenders were tracked down and rejected the approach. Put another way, I think most people that are victims of crime would appreciate the time/effort/commitment the Biden DOJ spent on tracking down and overcharging low level offenders, but realize the hypocrisy in play. I think it mattered in November, and mattered beyond people who identify as MAGA voters. So, pardons were appropriate for some, not for more violent offenders. Do you think Trump went through each case, considered each charge, reviewed the evidence available, and consulted with his staff to issue the pardons on a single case basis? 2
The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Do you think Trump went through each case, considered each charge, reviewed the evidence available, and consulted with his staff to issue the pardons on a single case basis? Did anyone notice that he forgot to sign his own prescription drug EO yesterday and had to be prompted by staff? INCOMPETENT! And incontinent too.
Westside Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Doc Brown said: Do you think Trump went through each case, considered each charge, reviewed the evidence available, and consulted with his staff to issue the pardons on a single case basis? Do you think bidens DOJ did that before prosecuting a misdemeanor charge of trespassing into a felony? Or do you think they deliberately let some people sit in prison for three years without any trial?
JDHillFan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 39 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Did anyone notice that he forgot to sign his own prescription drug EO yesterday and had to be prompted by staff? INCOMPETENT! And incontinent too. Speaking of INCOMPETENCE, and the topic of this thread, how did you and your “reliable” mainstream media miss the boat on the Biden is not mentally fit story? It was obvious to everyone else alive (Redhawk not withstanding).
stevestojan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, Big Blitz said: This isn’t about Biden. It’s about the media. We are driving final nails in coffins. That’s fair. 👍
The Frankish Reich Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Speaking of INCOMPETENCE, and the topic of this thread, how did you and your “reliable” mainstream media miss the boat on the Biden is not mentally fit story? It was obvious to everyone else alive (Redhawk not withstanding). Talk about flogging a dead horse. It is obvious to anyone that a man at 80 is not as energetic or quick-minded as a man at 40, or 50, or 60. It is even more obvious that a man at 80 is not as physically adept as a man at a younger age. The question was always "Is he competent to serve as president." And again, we had a binary choice (until Biden dropped out). Two elderly men, both clearly past their prime. I say that one's presidency showed a pretty steady hand at the stick. I said Biden was aging out of the public part of the job; the point is he still had a handle - his TEAM had a handle - on the private/policy part. Trump long ago aged out of the private/policy part, which is an utter mess. He is nothing but a pitchman now, whether it's pitching steaks or crypto or real estate or the big beautiful bill. I'd like to have a President who is good at both the bully pulpit part and the policy part. But to be honest, we haven't had that since Bill Clinton.
Recommended Posts