Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Are we the only country on earth capable of sending aid to other countries? 


Why not lead by example as the wealthiest nation on earth?

Posted
Just now, Roundybout said:


Why not lead by example as the wealthiest nation on earth?

How bout no.

Here's an idea.....if you live in an area that struggles with basic necessities like food and shelter maybe you shouldn't procreate.

Posted
6 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

How bout no.

Here's an idea.....if you live in an area that struggles with basic necessities like food and shelter maybe you shouldn't procreate.


Oh it’s just that easy! You should go tell that to the thousands dying of cholera in Sudan. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Good for them! 

How is this any of my problem?


We have a moral obligation to help the poor. Human rights are universal. 

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

Anyone surprised ?

 

The DNC's collapse is the direct result of the defunding of USAID

by George Harizanov

 

By all accounts, even those of liberal media outlets, the Democratic National Committee is broke. Under the leadership of chairman Ken Martin, the DNC is facing a full-blown financial crisis. But how did it come to this?

 

Well, donor flight is one part of the answer. Since President Trump and J.D. Vance took office in a historic victory, the DNC's once-reliable donor class has slammed the brakes on contributions.

 

But the bigger story, and one the mainstream press won't touch, is that a critical pipeline of cash has been shut off: the massive taxpayer-funded slush fund known as USAID.

 

https://humanevents.com/2025/08/13/george-harizanov-the-dncs-collapse-is-the-direct-result-of-the-defunding-of-usaid

 

.

  • Agree 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/1/2025 at 12:10 PM, AverageAllensSuspensor said:

 

I am extremely suspicious of this conclusion, as I have seen similar things in the past.

 

In the link, at least as far as I could tell, there is no mention of aid totals that are separate from official gov numbers.

The US grants aid as a government, and that is what seems to be reported in this link.

 

US citizens also have thousands of avenues to provide such aid that are not reported as official gov aid, largely religious.

Other countries do not have near that participation.

I believe that if total aid from US citizens, including not formal gov aid was included in these numbers, it would drastically change the conclusion.

Most US citizens support charities that are not part of any gov report.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

I am extremely suspicious of this conclusion, as I have seen similar things in the past.

 

In the link, at least as far as I could tell, there is no mention of aid totals that are separate from official gov numbers.

The US grants aid as a government, and that is what seems to be reported in this link.

 

US citizens also have thousands of avenues to provide such aid that are not reported as official gov aid, largely religious.

Other countries do not have near that participation.

I believe that if total aid from US citizens, including not formal gov aid was included in these numbers, it would drastically change the conclusion.

Most US citizens support charities that are not part of any gov report.

Faith related aid often comes with strings attached 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Faith related aid often comes with strings attached 

 

That may be something you're interested in.

I do a good deal of dispursement this at our church, and I am not aware of anything attaching strings, but to each his own.

 

I am simply stating that a great deal of charitable contributions that US citizens make are not reported in any official capacity, and certainly not as gov aid.

It could be argued that a small amount of it could be monitored by allowable tax deductions, but that would be another false path, as a great deal of these are not reported to the IRS since people don't itemize as often since the standard deductions are large enough to eliminate that reporting.

 

The point is that the US citizen gives  way more in charity than is ever accounted for by gov stats, and those avenues are not nearly as opted for by foreign citizens,

 

 

Edited by sherpa
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, sherpa said:

 

I am extremely suspicious of this conclusion, as I have seen similar things in the past.

 

In the link, at least as far as I could tell, there is no mention of aid totals that are separate from official gov numbers.

The US grants aid as a government, and that is what seems to be reported in this link.

 

US citizens also have thousands of avenues to provide such aid that are not reported as official gov aid, largely religious.

Other countries do not have near that participation.

I believe that if total aid from US citizens, including not formal gov aid was included in these numbers, it would drastically change the conclusion.

Most US citizens support charities that are not part of any gov report.

 

What makes you think/say other nations do not have the same participation in non government foreign aid? Reading this forum I would asume the complete opposite. America first etc.

 

The numbers are what they are. Other nations donate way more per capita. However I know Maga are completely immune to statistics and numbers. If they don't fit the script they are fake news, so I do not expect you to believe in any official numbers.

Posted
8 minutes ago, AverageAllensSuspensor said:

 

What makes you think/say other nations do not have the same participation in non government foreign aid? Reading this forum I would asume the complete opposite. America first etc.

 

The numbers are what they are. Other nations donate way more per capita. However I know Maga are completely immune to statistics and numbers. If they don't fit the script they are fake news, so I do not expect you to believe in any official numbers.

 

Another idiotic accusation.

This has nothing to do with Trump or any of his supporters.

Absolutely nothing, but that oft repeated nonsense cannot be avoided by folks, and it is so illustrative of ignorance.

 

I remember looking at this stuff years ago, and the amount of charity from US citizens is not nearly accurately reported because there are thousands of pathways to do so that are not statistically tracked, by gov reports.

 

Believe what you want, but there isn't a single greater charitable nation in history that gets close to the US, and the charity extends well beyond money.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 7/1/2025 at 10:02 AM, Roundybout said:


Why not lead by example as the wealthiest nation on earth?

so taxing us for somebody's perceived charity?

 

I think we tax us for our basic services and then anyone that wants to give charity is free to give to any and all charities of their choice

×
×
  • Create New...