BillStime Posted May 4 Author Share Posted May 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 4 Author Share Posted May 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 5 hours ago, BillStime said: There was no obligation to disclose the payment to anyone at anytime. That's why the ND in NDA means non-disclosure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted May 4 Share Posted May 4 37 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: There was no obligation to disclose the payment to anyone at anytime. That's why the ND in NDA means non-disclosure. And Hicks said Trump did it so that Melania wouldn't find out. Again, reasonable doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 5 Author Share Posted May 5 8 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: There was no obligation to disclose the payment to anyone at anytime. That's why the ND in NDA means non-disclosure. 7 hours ago, Doc said: And Hicks said Trump did it so that Melania wouldn't find out. Again, reasonable doubt. False. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 6 Author Share Posted May 6 Anyone sense fear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 6 Author Share Posted May 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 7 Author Share Posted May 7 Why is Conald so panicked if his “legal scholars and experts” told him they have no case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 34 minutes ago, BillStime said: Why is Conald so panicked if his “legal scholars and experts” told him they have no case? From the deleted Trump post: "no time for lawyers to prepare." What? No time to prepare for something they knew was coming for at least a year? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 On 5/4/2024 at 4:09 PM, All_Pro_Bills said: There was no obligation to disclose the payment to anyone at anytime. That's why the ND in NDA means non-disclosure. If the purpose of the transaction is to benefit the campaign, then there is an obligation to disclose it to the FEC. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 They absolutely will do whatever it takes to make sure the outcome is the same this time. You're about to witness blatant rigging and fraud on an unprecedented level. 2020 was child's play. Media and useful idiots will call them conspiracy theories and declare 2024 the new most secure election in US history. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 7 Author Share Posted May 7 7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: They absolutely will do whatever it takes to make sure the outcome is the same this time. You're about to witness blatant rigging and fraud on an unprecedented level. 2020 was child's play. Media and useful idiots will call them conspiracy theories and declare 2024 the new most secure election in US history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 Is this where the defense shows the jury the letter stormy wrote where she said this was a made up story? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 3 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Is this where the defense shows the jury the letter stormy wrote where she said this was a made up story? Judging from the conversation between the judge and the attorneys for both sides, sounds like she's actually going to testify that she did indeed sleep with him. I'd expect the defense will raise the issue of the letter as a way to impeach her. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 5 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Is this where the defense shows the jury the letter stormy wrote where she said this was a made up story? Probably. This could get interesting. As many of you know, I've been waiting for the testimony about Trump's penis. The judge seems to have just ruled that out. For now. If the defense starts asking questions about exactly what happens, that door can open ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 Again the left shows it's strange fascination/obsession with genitals. It's almost as strong of a law as the lefty iron law of projection. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 7 Author Share Posted May 7 On 4/16/2024 at 10:59 AM, ChiGoose said: Looks like Trump was having trouble understanding the judge's actual instructions. But I suppose we cannot let the facts stand in the way of some good rage baiting. Trump is seething about missing Barron’s graduation. Here’s what the judge actually said "Before jury selection commenced, Mr Trump’s lawyer, Todd Blanche, asked Judge Juan Merchan if the court could adjourn on 17 May so Mr Trump could attend Barron’s graduation. In New York, criminal defendants must attend trial unless they apply for a waiver, which Mr Trump has not done. Judge Merchan said he could not rule “at this time” but noted that if the trial was “running behind schedule” they would not be able to accommodate. Despite no firm ruling on the matter, Mr Trump still purported that the judge made an unfair ruling preventing him from attending his son’s graduation." The truth *always* comes out: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 On 5/2/2024 at 11:42 PM, ChiGoose said: I’m sorry, I suppose the reality of how things actually work is a concept far too difficult for you to understand. Maybe grab some toy blocks to smash together and leave the rest of this to the adults. He's too busy anesthetizing, intubating, ventilating, reviving and monitoring critically ill surgical patients, don't you know.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted May 7 Author Share Posted May 7 8 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Again the left shows it's strange fascination/obsession with genitals. It's almost as strong of a law as the lefty iron law of projection. Every accusation is a confession Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 31 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: They absolutely will do whatever it takes to make sure the outcome is the same this time. You're about to witness blatant rigging and fraud on an unprecedented level. 2020 was child's play. Media and useful idiots will call them conspiracy theories and declare 2024 the new most secure election in US history. This is the stupidest "there must have been fraud" theory ever. How many people flocked to Eugene McCarthy rallies in 1968? George Wallace rallies that same year? As opposed to Nixon rallies. Did more people show up for Bernie vs. Hillary? What makes anyone think that those who attend rallies are representative of the electorate in general? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts