Jump to content

Taking care of big money. Houses first act.


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Do you believe we need 100k agents to deal with the less than 1 million people in US who make a million a year? Or do you believe that the 87k would not be used primarily on those who make less than $200k a year?

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Do you believe we need 100k agents to deal with the less than 1 million people in US who make a million a year? Or do you believe that the 87k would not be used primarily on those who make less than $200k a year?

I believe with Dem oversight, they would go after big money.  And the effort would pay for itself many, many times over.  I don't think 1 agent/10000 very high earners is a bad ratio

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

I believe with Dem oversight, they would go after big money.  And the effort would pay for itself many, many times over.  I don't think 1 agent/10000 very high earners is a bad ratio

This is such a naive thread…Dems are Big Money, as big money runs the government…

 

It makes no sense for them to suppress their donors…But it does make sense to try to suppress the people attempting to expose the corruption…

 

All you have to do is look at every action the Biden administration has done to put down “the little guy” and then look at every action they have taken to side with Big Pharma, Big Tech and the Big Banks…

 

The Dems are Big Money…

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

I believe with Dem oversight, they would go after big money.  And the effort would pay for itself many, many times over.  I don't think 1 agent/10000 very high earners is a bad ratio

You do realize that the top 25 percent of earners paid almost 90 percent of all income taxes in 2020. 

 

https://www.ntu.org/foundation/tax-page/who-pays-income-taxes

Edited by wnyguy
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

You do realize that the top 25 percent of earners paid almost 90 percent of all income taxes in 2020. 

 

https://www.ntu.org/foundation/tax-page/who-pays-income-taxes

I do, all too well.   but some in that group are more equal than others...

28 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

This is such a naive thread…Dems are Big Money, as big money runs the government…

 

It makes no sense for them to suppress their donors…But it does make sense to try to suppress the people attempting to expose the corruption…

 

All you have to do is look at every action the Biden administration has done to put down “the little guy” and then look at every action they have taken to side with Big Pharma, Big Tech and the Big Banks…

 

The Dems are Big Money…

not on this bill.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This partisan fight over funding the IRS to support Federal tax revenue collection is moot because there are no constraints on how much the government can spend other than the rubber stamp annual Congressional vote.  To make up any gap in budget vs. tax revenue they just borrow as much money as they need to fund whatever they decide to fund.  And never pay it back.  While this Ponzi scheme Federal budget process is unsustainable the fun part is to do the math, look at currently rising rates, and debt rollover funding, and time out when all Federal tax revenue will be necessary to fund interest payments on the national debt.  But I expect well before that happens the world of finance will figure it out and the Sheet will hit the fan for the Washington spending machine and it will be game over.      

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

This partisan fight over funding the IRS to support Federal tax revenue collection is moot because there are no constraints on how much the government can spend other than the rubber stamp annual Congressional vote.  To make up any gap in budget vs. tax revenue they just borrow as much money as they need to fund whatever they decide to fund.  And never pay it back.  While this Ponzi scheme Federal budget process is unsustainable the fun part is to do the math, look at currently rising rates, and debt rollover funding, and time out when all Federal tax revenue will be necessary to fund interest payments on the national debt.  But I expect well before that happens the world of finance will figure it out and the Sheet will hit the fan for the Washington spending machine and it will be game over.      


You guys have been saying this for decades. It ain’t gonna happen. Stop making it such a taking point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said:

Do you believe we need 100k agents to deal with the less than 1 million people in US who make a million a year? Or do you believe that the 87k would not be used primarily on those who make less than $200k a year?

Look, there’s a lot, lot of tax cheating going on. Including on things like child tax credits, including tax

returns from middle and lower income people, some of whom happen to be the immigrants decried for getting tax payer funded benefits. I pay my share honestly. I have no problem with a government making sure that other people do too. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Look, there’s a lot, lot of tax cheating going on. Including on things like child tax credits, including tax

returns from middle and lower income people, some of whom happen to be the immigrants decried for getting tax payer funded benefits. I pay my share honestly. I have no problem with a government making sure that other people do too. 


Not only that, but a lot of the headcount is to replace people who are leaving and not all of it is for agents either. 
 

But you can always bet on the GOP helping the rich and tax cheats while selling it to a willing public as somehow benefiting them when it actually hurts them. They’ll eat it up anyway. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we have some accountants who comment here. I’d like to hear their take on this. 
I’m not an accountant, but I have had occasion to review lots of tax filings in my line of work. My impression: there’s not all that much cheating (or room to cheat) among salaried employees, even those who are very well compensated. 
But the world of business owners/self-employed/consultants? That’s a different story. And it includes the big money types (Trump’s taxes) all the way down to the construction contractor. And they rarely get audited. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I know we have some accountants who comment here. I’d like to hear their take on this. 
I’m not an accountant, but I have had occasion to review lots of tax filings in my line of work. My impression: there’s not all that much cheating (or room to cheat) among salaried employees, even those who are very well compensated. 
But the world of business owners/self-employed/consultants? That’s a different story. And it includes the big money types (Trump’s taxes) all the way down to the construction contractor. And they rarely get audited. 

Say what? So you, who admittedly has limited experience with reviewing taxes holds this opinion, but apparently this has escaped the IRS? If so, we don’t need more agents, we need ones that know what the f$&k they’re doing! (Or they could just call you. 😉)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Say what? So you, who admittedly has limited experience with reviewing taxes holds this opinion, but apparently this has escaped the IRS? If so, we don’t need more agents, we need ones that know what the f$&k they’re doing! (Or they could just call you. 😉)

I asked our accountants to weigh in. So that’s exactly what I said: my impression. And no, it hasn’t “escaped the IRS.” That’s why they want to shore up the ranks of auditors. I thought that’s what we were discussing. You sound almost like someone with something to hide …

And believe me, it’s not all high end taxpayers. Many were recent immigrants claiming 5 “nephews” they had custody of, getting back way more in so called “refundable” tax credits than they ever paid in, all assisted by tax preparers who sometimes did it this way without their knowledge. 

Edited by The Frankish Reich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I know we have some accountants who comment here. I’d like to hear their take on this. 
I’m not an accountant, but I have had occasion to review lots of tax filings in my line of work. My impression: there’s not all that much cheating (or room to cheat) among salaried employees, even those who are very well compensated. 
But the world of business owners/self-employed/consultants? That’s a different story. And it includes the big money types (Trump’s taxes) all the way down to the construction contractor. And they rarely get audited. 

Owned my own business for years.  Never cheated but knew a guy that did and got caught (was also taking his employees retirement savings).  I think most small businesses use their own accountants and lawyers.  They're not going to easily risk losing their licenses.  But the companies with in house guys, those need to be watched more closely.  btw, I was audited as a grad student research asst earning $7000/yr because I claimed the pay as an educational grant (it was).  They dropped it but this kind of thing is stupid.  Go after the big fish and get big returns.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I asked our accountants to weigh in. So that’s exactly what I said: my impression. And no, it hasn’t “escaped the IRS.” That’s why they want to shore up the ranks of auditors. I thought that’s what we were discussing. You sound almost like someone with something to hide …

And believe me, it’s not all high end taxpayers. Many were recent immigrants claiming 5 “nephews” they had custody of, getting back way more in so called “refundable” tax credits than they ever paid in, all assisted by tax preparers who sometimes did it this way without their knowledge. 

Lighten up Frank. I have nothing to hide. I’m the one paying for everything. And you appear to be the one thinking guys like me are getting away with ‘stuff’. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Lighten up Frank. I have nothing to hide. I’m the one paying for everything. And you appear to be the one thinking guys like me are getting away with ‘stuff’. 

No. I don’t know your situation, and I’m sure the majority of business owners are on the up and up. 
Look, I hate our tax system. If I could be assured that the progressive income tax would never come back, I’d be all for a VAT/consumption tax + a low flat tax to finance the government. Tax compliance exerts a dead weight cost on all US economic activity. 
But that’s not what we have now, so we need to trust but verify. And audits are hated, but how else do you verify?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...