Twitter Files Part 10: How Twitter Rigged The Covid Debate

[B-Man]

 

 

Government and tech worked together to release only approved, often wrong, information.

 

If you’re still asking “what’s the big deal?” I don’t know what to tell you.

 

 

 

Here’s the Trump tweet Jim Baker suggested was a violation of Twitter’s COVID-19 policy (eye roll)

 

 

Another #TwitterFiles dropped this morning, this one on what Twitter did to control the COVID debate. And of course, they were controlling it on the behalf of the government and public health … like Fauci.

 

No debate allowed.

 

No differing opinions were allowed.

 

Just the pre-approved messaging that was quite literally terrifying the masses and ultimately making them easier to control. Oh, were we not supposed to say that part out loud? About controlling everyone? Oopsie, our bad. Guess we’ll just have to wait for someone to ‘handle’ us, right? That’s how this works now, yes? For example, Jim Baker (one of the main characters of these Twitter files) questioned if Trump’s tweet telling people not to be afraid of COVID was against their COVID policy.

 

They didn’t want anyone to be relieved or feel like it was going to be ok.

Wonder why that was?

 

Just kidding, we know exactly why that was.

 

 

7 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

you’re thrashing a bit here.

 

 

Billsy is "thrashing" much more than a bit.

 

😄

[RiotAct]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Government and tech worked together to release only approved, often wrong, information.

 

If you’re still asking “what’s the big deal?” I don’t know what to tell you.

 

 

 

Here’s the Trump tweet Jim Baker suggested was a violation of Twitter’s COVID-19 policy (eye roll)

 

 

Another #TwitterFiles dropped this morning, this one on what Twitter did to control the COVID debate. And of course, they were controlling it on the behalf of the government and public health … like Fauci.

 

No debate allowed.

 

No differing opinions were allowed.

 

Just the pre-approved messaging that was quite literally terrifying the masses and ultimately making them easier to control. Oh, were we not supposed to say that part out loud? About controlling everyone? Oopsie, our bad. Guess we’ll just have to wait for someone to ‘handle’ us, right? That’s how this works now, yes? For example, Jim Baker (one of the main characters of these Twitter files) questioned if Trump’s tweet telling people not to be afraid of COVID was against their COVID policy.

 

They didn’t want anyone to be relieved or feel like it was going to be ok.

Wonder why that was?

 

Just kidding, we know exactly why that was.

 

 

 

 

Billsy is "thrashing" much more than a bit.

 

😄

I know, I’m trying to be kind around  the holidays.

[BillsFanNC]

You have nothing to fear except not fearing covid itself.

[BillStime]

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

You have nothing to fear except not fearing covid itself.

Yet your savior Jesus Trump:

 

Trump Was Sicker Than Acknowledged With Covid-19

 

Inside the extraordinary effort to save Trump from covid-19

 

 

[B-Man]

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Billsy is "thrashing" much more than a bit.

 

😄

 

 

Wow.

 

I didn't realize how manic phase B.S. was today.

 

 

[BillStime]

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Government and tech worked together to release only approved, often wrong, information.

 

If you’re still asking “what’s the big deal?” I don’t know what to tell you.

 

 

 

Here’s the Trump tweet Jim Baker suggested was a violation of Twitter’s COVID-19 policy (eye roll)

 

 

Another #TwitterFiles dropped this morning, this one on what Twitter did to control the COVID debate. And of course, they were controlling it on the behalf of the government and public health … like Fauci.

 

No debate allowed.

 

No differing opinions were allowed.

 

Just the pre-approved messaging that was quite literally terrifying the masses and ultimately making them easier to control. Oh, were we not supposed to say that part out loud? About controlling everyone? Oopsie, our bad. Guess we’ll just have to wait for someone to ‘handle’ us, right? That’s how this works now, yes? For example, Jim Baker (one of the main characters of these Twitter files) questioned if Trump’s tweet telling people not to be afraid of COVID was against their COVID policy.

 

They didn’t want anyone to be relieved or feel like it was going to be ok.

Wonder why that was?

 

Just kidding, we know exactly why that was.

 

 

 

 

Billsy is "thrashing" much more than a bit.

 

😄

You love to plagiarize eh?

 

Talk about leveraging:

 

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

only approved, often wrong, information.

 

idiots 

Edited December 27, 2022 by BillStime

[BillStime]

 

[B-Man]

NOTES ON THE TWITTER FILES (10)

By Scott Johnson.

 

FTA:

 

None of Zweig’s revelations comes as a surprise. The work flies under the banner of misinformation/disinformation. Going back to the annus horribilis of 2020, Twitter acted as an arm of American political and public health authorities. Dr. Fauci, he was the science, so to speak. Jumping ahead to the Biden era, Zweig’s column strikes a familiar note:

 

When the Biden administration took over, its agenda for the American people can be summed up as: Be very afraid of Covid and do exactly what we say to stay safe.

In July 2021, then-U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy released a 22-page advisory concerning what the World Health Organization referred to as an “infodemic,” and called on social media platforms to do more to shut down “misformation.”

“We are asking them to step up,” Murthy said. “We can’t wait longer for them to take aggressive action.”

That’s the message the White House had already taken directly to Twitter executives in private channels. One of the Biden administration’s first meeting requests was about Covid, with a focus on “anti-vaxxer accounts,” according to a meeting summary by Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s Head of U.S. Public Policy.

 

Alex Berenson had to go:

 

By the summer of 2021, the day after Murthy’s memo, Biden announced publicly that social media companies were “killing people” by allowing misinformation about vaccines. Just hours later, Twitter locked Berenson out of his account, and then permanently suspended him the next month. Berenson sued Twitter. He ultimately settled with the company, and is now back on the platform. As part of the lawsuit, Twitter was compelled to provide certain internal communications. They revealed that the White House had directly met with Twitter employees and pressured them to take action on Berenson.

 

The summary of meetings by Culbertson, emailed to colleagues in December 2022, adds new evidence of the White House’s pressure campaign, and illustrates how it tried to directly influence what content was allowed on Twitter.

 

It wasn’t just Berenson. Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff had to be suppressed. Dr. Andrew Bostrom had to be suppressed. Opinions out of line with the political and public health authorities had to be suppressed.

 

 

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/12/notes-on-the-twitter-files-10.php

 

[BillStime]

#winning

 

 

[JaCrispy]

Bump for BillStime because he wonders when the Biden administration colluded with Big Tech…😉

[B-Man]

'

 

Musk Exposes Fauci

by Lloyd Billingsley

 

Elon Musk is transforming Twitter from a government censorship bureau into a powerhouse of investigative journalism. The Biden Junta doesn’t like it. Musk’s tweet of “My pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci” drew a furious reaction from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who said criticizing Dr. Fauci was “dangerous,” “disgusting” and “divorced from reality.”

 

Musk didn’t think so, and started digging deeper. On December 28, Musk tweeted, “Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH – the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically – is his wife.” That would be National Institutes of Health bioethics boss Christine Grady.

 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/musk-exposes-fauci/

[BillsFanNC]

12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

'

 

Musk Exposes Fauci

by Lloyd Billingsley

 

Elon Musk is transforming Twitter from a government censorship bureau into a powerhouse of investigative journalism. The Biden Junta doesn’t like it. Musk’s tweet of “My pronouns are Prosecute/Fauci” drew a furious reaction from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who said criticizing Dr. Fauci was “dangerous,” “disgusting” and “divorced from reality.”

 

Musk didn’t think so, and started digging deeper. On December 28, Musk tweeted, “Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH – the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically – is his wife.” That would be National Institutes of Health bioethics boss Christine Grady.

 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/musk-exposes-fauci/

 

Yep.

 

 

[Big Blitz]

Silicon Valley is a hostile foreign nation

 

 

 

[daz28]

The Fauci's wife thing is not only old, but already proven wrong.  Amazingly, you can even find this information on Fox news.  Well, at least now we know that Twitter isn't trying to censor misinformation anymore.  

[Joe Ferguson forever]

On 12/26/2022 at 11:26 AM, BillsFanNC said:

You don't say??

 

Non scientific Twitter staff flagging a Harvard epidemiologist for covid misinformation?

 

Ministry of truth.

 

 

Far too much disinformation to debunk in a single post.  But let's look at Kulldorf.  He's an epidemiologist.  Not a physician and no longer at Harvard (I know, I'm shocked too).  He now has a faculty gig at Hillsdale.  Imagine that.  A beacon of medical innovation and enlightenment.  He's been rejected by his peers.  Now you might say that's a conspiracy against his stance on covid.  But more likely, most Infectious disease experts and respected epidemiologists thought he was nuts and a political hack who had no business in academia. But Hillsdale will love him.

 

"In December 2021 Kulldorff published an error-laden essay for the Brownstone Institute in which he falsely claimed that influenza was more hazardous to children than COVID-19, and on that basis illogically argued against children receiving COVID-19 vaccination. In reality, influenza had been responsible for one child death in the 2020/21 season, while public health mitigation of COVID-19 was in place – COVID-19 had, in contrast, killed more than 1,000.[22]

On February 13, 2022, Kulldorff tweeted in support of the Canada convoy protest,[42] which was organized to protest against vaccine mandates and other government restrictions regarding COVID-19.[43] In December 2022, Florida Gov. DeSantis named Kulldorff, Bhattacharya, and several other opponents of the scientific consensus on COVID-19 vaccines to his newly formed Public Health Integrity Committee to "offer critical assessments" of recommendations from federal health agencies.[44]"

[JDHillFan]

2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Far too much disinformation to debunk in a single post.  But let's look at Kulldorf.  He's an epidemiologist.  Not a physician and no longer at Harvard (I know, I'm shocked too).  He now has a faculty gig at Hillsdale.  Imagine that.  A beacon of medical innovation and enlightenment.  He's been rejected by his peers.  Now you might say that's a conspiracy against his stance on covid.  But more likely, most Infectious disease experts and respected epidemiologists thought he was nuts and a political hack who had no business in academia. But Hillsdale will love him.

 

"In December 2021 Kulldorff published an error-laden essay for the Brownstone Institute in which he falsely claimed that influenza was more hazardous to children than COVID-19, and on that basis illogically argued against children receiving COVID-19 vaccination. In reality, influenza had been responsible for one child death in the 2020/21 season, while public health mitigation of COVID-19 was in place – COVID-19 had, in contrast, killed more than 1,000.[22]

On February 13, 2022, Kulldorff tweeted in support of the Canada convoy protest,[42] which was organized to protest against vaccine mandates and other government restrictions regarding COVID-19.[43] In December 2022, Florida Gov. DeSantis named Kulldorff, Bhattacharya, and several other opponents of the scientific consensus on COVID-19 vaccines to his newly formed Public Health Integrity Committee to "offer critical assessments" of recommendations from federal health agencies.[44]"

There’s a reason you didn’t provide a link here. It’s because your source rhymes with Dikipedia. We know how accurate that is. Nice work! 🤦 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

5 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

There’s a reason you didn’t provide a link here. It’s because your source rhymes with Dikipedia. We know how accurate that is. Nice work! 🤦 

Yes, it was.  He's not famous in academic circles.  Perhaps infamous.  How bout this:  https://dc.hillsdale.edu/Academy-for-Science-and-Freedom/Martin-Kulldorf/.

I love how they put "on leave" in his description to legitimize him (while simultaneously chiding Harvard for wokeism and elitism).

Edited January 13, 2023 by redtail hawk

[Tommy Callahan]

"In December 2021 Kulldorff published an error-laden essay for the Brownstone Institute in which he falsely claimed that influenza was more hazardous to children than COVID-19, and on that basis illogically argued against children receiving COVID-19 vaccination.

 

not false at all.

 

Statistically Covid has almost no long term or serous impact on children.

 

The Flu Kills.

 

 

[Big Blitz]

 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

9 hours ago, Chris farley said:

"In December 2021 Kulldorff published an error-laden essay for the Brownstone Institute in which he falsely claimed that influenza was more hazardous to children than COVID-19, and on that basis illogically argued against children receiving COVID-19 vaccination.

 

not false at all.

 

Statistically Covid has almost no long term or serous impact on children.

 

The Flu Kills.

 

 

Not that year.  We were all wearing masks.  I don't recall diagnosing the flu once.  And eventually (long time coming) we had a swab that checked for Flu, Covid and RSV.  Yeah, we still didn't have PPE tho.