Jump to content

Twitter Files Part 10: How Twitter Rigged The Covid Debate


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

Asking people to not be afraid...

 

Should we flag that as MIsInFoRmATiOn?

 

:lol:

 

 

Again...these fuc.k sticks wouldn't know real science if it bit them on the sphincter. Who the ***** are they to be telling ANYONE what to follow, least of all anything scientific. 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Asking people to not be afraid...

 

Should we flag that as MIsInFoRmATiOn?

 

:lol:

 

 

Again...these fuc.k sticks wouldn't know real science if it bit them on the sphincter. Who the ***** are they to be telling ANYONE what to follow, least of all anything scientific. 

 

 

Thats nutz.

 Between the MSM, social media the Mask hole/Covididians were riled up to the point of stunting kids development in the name of "science" that didnt exist.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Using the CDC’s own data to state an objective fact would get you suppressed under Twitter’s old regime if it went against the official narrative.

 

That’s how committed they were to a certain set of talking points.

 

That those talking points came directly from the government (namely, the White House and CDC) only makes things all the worse.

 

 

As Zweig goes on to explain, Twitter eventually began to shape its moderation around official White House views. That meant suppressing or outright banning medical professionals who were sharing evidence-based views contrary to the “narrative” about things like natural immunity and mask efficacy. Much of that was done by bots which were trained via machine learning to spot certain words and phrases.

 

 

We all know this.

 

Our government (under Trump and Biden) was suppressing the truth.

 

The release of these files shows us that we must not allow this to happen again. . . . . . . . . they will try very soon.

 

 

..

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Using the CDC’s own data to state an objective fact would get you suppressed under Twitter’s old regime if it went against the official narrative.

 

That’s how committed they were to a certain set of talking points.

 

That those talking points came directly from the government (namely, the White House and CDC) only makes things all the worse.

 

 

As Zweig goes on to explain, Twitter eventually began to shape its moderation around official White House views. That meant suppressing or outright banning medical professionals who were sharing evidence-based views contrary to the “narrative” about things like natural immunity and mask efficacy. Much of that was done by bots which were trained via machine learning to spot certain words and phrases.

 

 

We all know this.

 

Our government (under Trump and Biden) was suppressing the truth.

 

The release of these files shows us that we must not allow this to happen again. . . . . . . . . they will try very soon.

 

 

..


You left out two things:

 

1) The source of your content:

 

REDSTATE - lmao

 

2) The best part of the article Bonnie the plagiarist left out:

 

I may be a partisan

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg
 

idiots 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no question this is true. We all knew it was true long before these files became public.

 

The government didn't care what the science was. They only cared about how it politically affected them.

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...