Tommy Callahan Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 5, 2023 Author Share Posted December 5, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irv Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 Biden. What a mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 8, 2023 Author Share Posted December 8, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted December 8, 2023 Share Posted December 8, 2023 3 minutes ago, BillStime said: Cut off his nuts & put them in a jar in a glass case so he can look at them every day in his jail cell !! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 15, 2023 Author Share Posted December 15, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 16, 2023 Author Share Posted December 16, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 16, 2023 Share Posted December 16, 2023 50 minutes ago, BillStime said: Maybe they were looking for WMD there? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted December 17, 2023 Share Posted December 17, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 17, 2023 Share Posted December 17, 2023 23 hours ago, Tiberius said: Maybe they were looking for WMD there? ...and? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 17, 2023 Author Share Posted December 17, 2023 2 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: Now do Melania Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 19, 2023 Author Share Posted December 19, 2023 Cancel all groomers* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 30, 2023 Author Share Posted December 30, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted December 30, 2023 Share Posted December 30, 2023 On 12/5/2023 at 2:07 PM, BillStime said: You do have to laugh at somebody, turning into a snowflake, whenever she self followed, a student home, lamenting that the boy was taking away her guns We’re standing outside of another congresswoman office, whenever she was not a congresswoman at the time banging on her door Or 16 minutes ago, BillStime said: Is this the same Republican who talked about how he had a friend that was married to an underage girl and they were making it work just fine Pig 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 30, 2023 Author Share Posted December 30, 2023 Totally normal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 2 Author Share Posted January 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 8 Author Share Posted January 8 Cancel all groomers, right @Unforgiven Oh, wait. Look at those Community Notes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 17 Author Share Posted January 17 So on brand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 Sick 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 7 minutes ago, BillStime said: Sick Well, I think that characterization - comparing himself to Church sex abusers - isn't fair. But ... listen to it. It's incoherent. He seems to be mixing up two uses of "immunity." The talk of police has to do with "qualified immunity" -- a much-criticized legal doctrine that a cop accused of violating someone's constitutional rights will be immune UNLESS the Court has previously found that this type of conduct is, in fact, a constitutional violation. The idea of Presidential immunity would be a whole different thing. No one is arguing that unless a prior President was found to have broken the law by, say, fomenting an insurrection, a current ex-President is immune from prosecution. The second part of this clip makes sense - it is a policy argument. The first part, however, is a total mess, and actually implies that a President is free to do all sorts of unconstitutional things so long as a prior Supreme Court decision didn't find them unconstitutional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts