SoCal Deek Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 7 minutes ago, Doc said: There's a time limit, you know. That is, unless you can claim you didn't know you had them (despite being in plain sight in a place you've gone into hundreds of times). With all due respect Doc, that isn’t what Goose is arguing. He/she says it’s about obstruction. But what’s being obstructed? Did the government need these documents for an ongoing investigation? Nope! This case is literally ridiculous. Possession of the documents was already remedied…by force. The issue is settled! If anyone should be bringing a case it would be Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 11 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: With all due respect Doc, that isn’t what Goose is arguing. He/she says it’s about obstruction. But what’s being obstructed? Did the government need these documents for an ongoing investigation? Nope! This case is literally ridiculous. Possession of the documents was already remedied…by force. The issue is settled! If anyone should be bringing a case it would be Trump. He obstructed their attempts to retrieve them. Apparently there is a time limit on when they need to be returned (except where noted) and he exceeded it so they raided his home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 16, 2023 Author Share Posted July 16, 2023 3 minutes ago, Doc said: He obstructed their attempts to retrieve them. Apparently there is a time limit on when they need to be returned (except where noted) and he exceeded it so they raided his home. Just like Deek won’t answer - nor will you - but why did Trump have his lawyers sign documents stating all documents were returned? Why are you turning yourselves inside out to defend this behavior? Have you noticed - when it comes to the cult - Trump is above the law and innocent AF 100% of the time. You can’t make this up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 15 minutes ago, Doc said: He obstructed their attempts to retrieve them. Apparently there is a time limit on when they need to be returned (except where noted) and he exceeded it so they raided his home. So if you disagree with the government you’re guilty of the crime of disagreeing with the government? Once again… that’s freaking insane! We better never get there as a country. But alas we may have already crossed that bridge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: So if you disagree with the government you’re guilty of the crime of disagreeing with the government? Once again… that’s freaking insane! We better never get there as a country. But alas we may have already crossed that bridge Yeah it's a disagreement. And while admittedly you typically can't disagree with the government, special people get special treatment. Excuses don't work for most, but for others they do...like saying you didn't know you had classified documents in your garage that you visit every weekend, just 6 months after documents you shouldn't have had were found elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 43 minutes ago, Doc said: Yeah it's a disagreement. And while admittedly you typically can't disagree with the government, special people get special treatment. Excuses don't work for most, but for others they do...like saying you didn't know you had classified documents in your garage that you visit every weekend, just 6 months after documents you shouldn't have had were found elsewhere. Doc…you ABSOLUTELY can disagree with the government. At least you can in this country. It’s one of things that make this country unique. Our Constitution is not there to protect the government from the citizens. It’s there to protect the citizens from the government! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 40 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Doc…you ABSOLUTELY can disagree with the government. At least you can in this country. It’s one of things that make this country unique. Our Constitution is not there to protect the government from the citizens. It’s there to protect the citizens from the government! I agree with all of that, and I should have said you can only disagree with them to a point. If they want to get you, they will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 18, 2023 Author Share Posted July 18, 2023 The most CORRUPT POTUS in our lifetime. And this guy is running for POTUS again? jfc I'm so glad these Trumpers are willing to piss and schitt all over the graves of our veterans who fought for our country so they can own the libs and sacrifice our republic. Shame on them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 19, 2023 Author Share Posted July 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 19, 2023 Share Posted July 19, 2023 CNN's Reaction to Trump's Latest Legal Issue Is Unintentionally Hilarious https://redstate.com/bonchie/2023/07/18/cnns-reaction-to-trumps-latest-legal-issue-is-unintentionally-hilarious-n778432 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 28, 2023 Author Share Posted July 28, 2023 Everyone knew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted July 28, 2023 Share Posted July 28, 2023 On 7/16/2023 at 12:27 PM, SoCal Deek said: Goose claims the dispute is over obstruction, NOT over the documents themselves. But how is it any way worth arresting your former boss once you already have your documents back? Unless of course the actual intent is to either aid or impress your new boss. Hmmmm? I really don’t think you’re getting it You make it sound like Donald Trump gave the documents back He didnt They had to physically go in and get them 3 minutes ago, BillStime said: Everyone knew They really didn’t have a choice, but now they’re facing the consequences of what they have done Donald Trump’s maga following is loyal and dangerous. The Republicans have put themselves in bed with them and now they’re gonna have to *****. There is no way another candidate beats out Trump for the Republican nomination There is no way Trump wins the presidency unless the Democrats put up a truly poor candidate On 7/18/2023 at 8:14 PM, BillStime said: I’m not in the conspiracy theories. I really hope that they have proof of this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted July 28, 2023 Share Posted July 28, 2023 On 7/16/2023 at 1:20 PM, BillStime said: Just like Deek won’t answer - nor will you - but why did Trump have his lawyers sign documents stating all documents were returned? Why are you turning yourselves inside out to defend this behavior? Have you noticed - when it comes to the cult - Trump is above the law and innocent AF 100% of the time. You can’t make this up. That has always been a curious point to me why defend someone that’s not worth defending just come up with a better candidate for the presidency. This guy isnt it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 28, 2023 Share Posted July 28, 2023 6 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: I really don’t think you’re getting it You make it sound like Donald Trump gave the documents back He didnt They had to physically go in and get them They really didn’t have a choice, but now they’re facing the consequences of what they have done Donald Trump’s maga following is loyal and dangerous. The Republicans have put themselves in bed with them and now they’re gonna have to *****. There is no way another candidate beats out Trump for the Republican nomination There is no way Trump wins the presidency unless the Democrats put up a truly poor candidate I’m not in the conspiracy theories. I really hope that they have proof of this. Again, John, really? The point I’m making is that if the dispute is over obstruction then it’s already been resolved when the government went and got them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 28, 2023 Author Share Posted July 28, 2023 8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Donald Trump’s maga following is loyal and dangerous. The Republicans have put themselves in bed with them and now they’re gonna have to *****. Do these idiots think this is helping with independents? Coupled with abortion and these far right laws against women, blacks, LGTBQ, and young people - the GQP is fkd. Donald Trump can’t be trusted ANYWHERE near the WH… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 28, 2023 Author Share Posted July 28, 2023 15 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: That has always been a curious point to me why defend someone that’s not worth defending just come up with a better candidate for the presidency. To own the libs - nothing else matters - including our republic. If facts matter - Conald would never have been elected POTUS. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted July 28, 2023 Share Posted July 28, 2023 38 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Again, John, really? The point I’m making is that if the dispute is over obstruction then it’s already been resolved when the government went and got them. Think about what you’re saying The FBI literally had to read Donald Trump’s home in order to get the documents. He didn’t give them back they were taken from him. How in the world is that clear up obstruction? When you have to have something taken away from you because you won’t give it back then you didn’t give it back 25 minutes ago, BillStime said: To own the libs - nothing else matters - including our republic. If facts matter - Conald would never have been elected POTUS. Donald Trump getting elected president was surprising to me at the time but I am not a fan of Hillary Clinton so I was kind of well let’s just see I don’t know how somebody who filed for bankruptcy six or seven times is supposed to run a country but who knows? Then he proceeded to show me why he should not have been elected president, but I blame the Democrats for putting up such a horrible ootion I still think that Bernie Sanders would’ve made a better president Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted July 28, 2023 Share Posted July 28, 2023 (edited) 27 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Think about what you’re saying The FBI literally had to read Donald Trump’s home in order to get the documents. He didn’t give them back they were taken from him. How in the world is that clear up obstruction? When you have to have something taken away from you because you won’t give it back then you didn’t give it back Donald Trump getting elected president was surprising to me at the time but I am not a fan of Hillary Clinton so I was kind of well let’s just see I don’t know how somebody who filed for bankruptcy six or seven times is supposed to run a country but who knows? Then he proceeded to show me why he should not have been elected president, but I blame the Democrats for putting up such a horrible ootion I still think that Bernie Sanders would’ve made a better president I would like you to be specific on trump’s bankruptcy please. Which businesses it was and the amount of them. Just so we’re factually correct as the school you work for should deal in specific facts since you work in higher education didn’t Bernie’s wife bankrupt an entire college? So you support this? Edited July 28, 2023 by aristocrat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted July 28, 2023 Share Posted July 28, 2023 (edited) 25 minutes ago, aristocrat said: I would like you to be specific on trump’s bankruptcy please. Which businesses it was and the amount of them. Just so we’re factually correct as the school you work for should deal in specific facts since you work in higher education didn’t Bernie’s wife bankrupt an entire college? So you support this? Anyone can get into some financial trouble and have a bankruptcy Multiple ones? By the way, Bernie’s wife is not a politician. I know Republicans have a hard time with us because they keep on going after non-politicians, trying to prove their points. A quick Google search https://philadelphiabankruptcylawyers.com/how-often-has-donald-trump-declared-bankruptcy/ Edited July 28, 2023 by John from Riverside 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 28, 2023 Author Share Posted July 28, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts