BillsFanNC Posted July 12, 2023 Author Share Posted July 12, 2023 The fact that Epps didnt enter the Capitol matters none. There are others who never entered who were charged. So @John from Riverside surprise, surprise....wrong again! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 Just now, BillsFanNC said: The fact that Epps didnt enter the Capitol matters none. There are others who never entered who were charged. So @John from Riverside surprise, surprise....wrong again! Two things need to be repeated to you twice You got charged if you were attacking capital police You got charged if you were destroying property People that were just milling around outside the capital didn’t get charged unless they gave an order to disperse and they just sat there There are laws they should be following them 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 3 hours ago, Pokebball said: There won't be any on the stand. He'll settle for the most he can settle for, long before he gets that far. They won't settle. They have him dead to rights on video. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 12, 2023 Share Posted July 12, 2023 10 minutes ago, Doc said: They won't settle. They have him dead to rights on video. Intent - “Doc” - they gotta prove intent - sound familiar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokebball Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 4 hours ago, Doc said: They won't settle. They have him dead to rights on video. It's a business decision for Fox. Do they want to spend 2 million in court and win, or spend 1 million to make it go away? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 13, 2023 Author Share Posted July 13, 2023 12 hours ago, John from Riverside said: Two things need to be repeated to you twice You got charged if you were attacking capital police You got charged if you were destroying property People that were just milling around outside the capital didn’t get charged unless they gave an order to disperse and they just sat there There are laws they should be following them Meet Brandon Straka. Never entered building. Never attacked police. Epps also never entered building. Was among the first to disobey police and defy their orders by breaching the barricade. Epps is also on video helping push a large metal framed Trump sign into a line of police. So the question needs to be repeated to you and other UIs again for the hundredth plus time... Why do you defend this one and only MAGA insurrectionist in Epps and not Brandon Straka and others who were charged yet were non violent and never entered the Capitol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 13, 2023 Author Share Posted July 13, 2023 (edited) Why the change of heart at NYT? Also if Trumps J6 speech was the match that lit the whole "insurrection" why was Epps encouraging people to storm the Capitol the night before? Did he have a copy of Trumps speech? @John from Riverside Edited July 13, 2023 by BillsFanNC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 8 hours ago, Pokebball said: It's a business decision for Fox. Do they want to spend 2 million in court and win, or spend 1 million to make it go away? They won't need to spend a dime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 This thread is definitive evidence that TDS exists. People are literally wrapping the facts around the narrative in what ever version makes Trump look worse at the moment. The only standard that makes sense with Rap Epps is that he is a Fed with protection because he is on video starting we must go into the capitol and on video making contact with the police. By the standards put out that day he would at the very least have been charged with something. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 5 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said: This thread is definitive evidence that TDS exists. People are literally wrapping the facts around the narrative in what ever version makes Trump look worse at the moment. The only standard that makes sense with Rap Epps is that he is a Fed with protection because he is on video starting we must go into the capitol and on video making contact with the police. By the standards put out that day he would at the very least have been charged with something. What I love is how we're forced to make such a simple issue a complex series of discussions because nobody in any official capacity ever wants to tell the truth. If Mr. Epps is not or was not a federal informant or confidential resource then Federal law enforcement should be compelled to testify under oath that, "No", Mr Epps is not an information or confidential resource. How hard is that? Problem solved. End of the mystery. And don't give us that "I cannot confirm or deny" BS. If he's not, he's not, and there should be no issue in saying that. The only reason for them to keep quiet is that Epps is an informant. That's all there is to it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 When does this psyop blow up in their pathetic faces? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted July 13, 2023 Author Share Posted July 13, 2023 ^^^^ And they know that they can rely on stupid useful idiots like @BillStime 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 👆🤡😅🤣😃 Karen Psyop - a freakshow who has yet to deliver on ANY f'n claim - the same person who claims she placed me on ignore over numerous times - is now Tweeting "CATTURD" to back up their RAY EPPs claims. JFC - you can't make this up. lmao What would their "leaders" do without pathetic idiots like Karen Psyop? F'n idiots 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 42 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: ^^^^ And they know that they can rely on stupid useful idiots like @BillStime I'd love to see ol' Ray testify on the stand. I give it a 0% chance of happening, though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 33 minutes ago, Doc said: I'd love to see ol' Ray testify on the stand. I give it a 0% chance of happening, though. Agreed. There’s little chance Fox will let this get to trial. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 31 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: Agreed. There’s little chance Fox will let this get to trial. Sure they will. Epps doens't have the money to see it get to trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 1 hour ago, Doc said: Sure they will. Epps doens't have the money to see it get to trial. Given the evidence, his lawyer may be working on contingency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 3 hours ago, BillStime said: Considering your support of tranny groomers and the Lincoln project, I am not surprised you have this gif of a kitty riding a unicorn ready. Would have expected a muscular Trump on the unicorn from you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 2 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Given the evidence, his lawyer may be working on contingency. Given the evidence, there's no chance he's working on contingency. Or for longer than after Fox says "settle this!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 12 minutes ago, Doc said: Given the evidence, there's no chance he's working on contingency. Or for longer than after Fox says "settle this!" Are you arguing that his lawyer is not on contingency because he should expect Fox to settle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts