Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LOL, and now its Raw story.

 

if its not some shady PAC, it's a site that's never even attempted journalism.

 

but explains a lot.

 

 

 

Oh c'mon - you would have loved if it had come from Breitbart or REDSTATE, right?

 

Idiot tries so hard. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Westside said:

Nobody gives a damn. Now let’s do hunters laptop and see how much the “big guy” made?


Nobody cares but here you are… lolz 

 

And yet - Hunters laptop has been dangling in front of voters for 2 plus years and the voters have not once but twice said:

 

Who the F cares?

 

And btw - why do you care so much about Hunters laptop yet conveniently look the other way when it comes to all of the corruption associated with the Trump administration? The amount of money the Trump org over charged the US government and taxpayers? Ivanka’s Chinese trademarks? The Saudis $2 BILLION donation to Jared’s PE firm? How much of that went to the big fat guy? 
 

Keep crying about Hunters laptop - it’s cute.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? 

 

They don't care.  And neither does anyone else about J6 anymore.  Just they don't care about the Summer of 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said:

I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? 

So you don't care Trump tried to violently steal the election, correct? 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

I have a simple and direct question for @Tiberius, @BillStime, and @ChiGoose- do you believe that this was anything more than a political inquisition when literally the only focus was Trump and the one person easily identifiable saying we need to enter the capitol is not mentioned in almost 1000 pages? 


I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. 
 

I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. 
 

I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. 

So…a supposedly hard-hitting investigation into an attack and occupation on our Capitol was overly-focused on Trump, had one member of the panel selling out the American people to avoid shining the light on members of her own party, and the democrat majority were completely comfortable with being handcuffed to the extent that all the American people hear are “rumors” of this betrayal?  
 

Even assuming this is the case, which part of the process wasn’t political?  Why would the honorable Thompson, Lofgen, Schiff, et al agree to such cuckholdery?  More importantly, given the rumor that they protected other potential enemy combatants and the truth has yet to be revealed, why would anyone accept the report of the committee as accurate and truthful? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


I do not believe that it was simply a political inquisition. 
 

I dislike how heavily it focused on Trump. He may have been a driver behind a lot of this but he was far from the only actor. The narrowed focus on him seems shortsighted and is rumored to be due to Cheney not wanting to go hard against other GOPers. 


Who had the most to benefit if they were successful? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

So…a supposedly hard-hitting investigation into an attack and occupation on our Capitol was overly-focused on Trump, had one member of the panel selling out the American people to avoid shining the light on members of her own party, and the democrat majority were completely comfortable with being handcuffed to the extent that all the American people hear are “rumors” of this betrayal?  
 

Even assuming this is the case, which part of the process wasn’t political?  Why would the honorable Thompson, Lofgen, Schiff, et al agree to such cuckholdery?  More importantly, given the rumor that they protected other potential enemy combatants and the truth has yet to be revealed, why would anyone accept the report of the committee as accurate and truthful? 


Obviously there are going to be politics involved, it’s Congress. The question was whether is was purely political, which I do not believe is true. 
 

We only have reporting on Cheney keeping the focus on Trump, so I can only speculate as to why Bennie Thompson would accept her demands. Maybe it was to keep the committee working together and prevent fracturing. I dunno. I haven’t read the full report yet but I heard it doesn’t mention Ginni Thomas at all. I’d imagine that was at Cheney’s insistence as well.

 

In the end, people will likely just believe what they want to believe anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...