SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 10 minutes ago, Kemp said: Trump has asked him to go after Biden. You've heard him say it. Barr doesn't seem anxious to do what Trump is asking of him. Is this news to you? it’s not just the Biden’s. he wants him to go after every Democratic that speaks out about him. He’ll, I bet he’s got a hush order out on Romney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: it’s not just the Biden’s. he wants him to go after every Democratic that speaks out about him. He’ll, I bet he’s got a hush order out on Romney ...well if you say so, that MUST be the case...SMH.......keep reading MEIN Kemp's posts....... Edited October 21, 2020 by OldTimeAFLGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 7 hours ago, aristocrat said: that's bidens son's business partner who is now cooperating and confirming the biden story. Do you know who cooperated and confirmed Trump's charity illegally used $2,000,000 of charitable funds for himself on things like a painting of himself and a Tim Tebow helmet? Trump himself when he was caught, forced to pay back the $2,000,000 to other charities and sign a statement acknowledging he broke the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragoon Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 On 10/18/2020 at 8:25 AM, SectionC3 said: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/e2-80-98lock-up-the-bidens-e2-80-99-trump-says-at-georgia-campaign-rally/ar-BB1a75L6 This is the stuff of banana republic dictators. It's what happens when we accommodate extremism. It has to end. There is no space for the unjustified incarceration of a political rival in any corner of this democracy. There is no space for the leader of this country to suggest such incarceration. And there should be no space for anyone to support that behavior, be it overtly, covertly, directly, or indirectly. This will be my last post here for awhile. It's come to my attention that my bluntness and honesty has hurt the feelings of some very tender Trump supporters here, and in doing so I may have hurt this website. I couldn't care less about the former issue; it's ironic and pathetic that a bunch of people who support misogyny, xenophobia, dog-whistle racism, and the unjustified incarceration of political opponents, and who lack the empathy to wear a mask to protect their neighbors during a pandemic, have complained about and are so damaged by the expression of truth. The latter issue, however, matters. I don't want to hurt this business, and I don't want to imperil this website. I've also wasted too much time here, amusing as it may be. So, I'll stand back and stand by for awhile. Hoax. I'm not a scumbag who supports the Proud Boys. But I will go away for awhile. That's the truth. Best of luck, and choose wisely in October/November. The fate of our democracy depends on it. Go Bills. I will see you all in happier times. Nobody respects you enough for you to be the source of hurt feelings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Kemp said: Trump has asked him to go after Biden. You've heard him say it. Barr doesn't seem anxious to do what Trump is asking of him. Is this news to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Improved DC Tom Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 2 hours ago, Dragoon said: Nobody respects you enough for you to be the source of hurt feelings. Counterpoint: he has no rational thought. Only feelings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 6 hours ago, Doc said: Maybe then, but things have changed now. He is? Oh. I forgot. Barr said he would do as Trump asked. Maybe in another dimension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 (edited) 10 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: Trump’s own business history is filled with overseas financial deals, and some have involved the Chinese state. He spent a decade unsuccessfully pursuing projects in China, operating an office there during his first run for president and forging a partnership with a major government-controlled company. And it turns out that China is one of only three foreign nations — the others are Britain and Ireland — where Trump maintains a bank account, according to an analysis of the president’s tax records, which were obtained by The New York Times. The foreign accounts do not show up on Trump’s public financial disclosures, where he must list personal assets, because they are held under corporate names. The identities of the financial institutions are not clear. The Chinese account is controlled by Trump International Hotels Management LLC, which the tax records show paid $188,561 in taxes in China while pursuing licensing deals there from 2013 to 2015. https://news.yahoo.com/trump-records-shed-light-chinese-120755338.html TeddyTrump insinuated I’m dumb huh? the same clown that can’t define Antifia after a year of being asked what it means? Says the idiot whose scared Trumps goons are going to accost him at the polling stations Youre 8 stages past dumb. You’re a poor example of a man. Lay off the pot, it’s making you paranoid. Edited October 22, 2020 by Teddy KGB 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 9 hours ago, Kemp said: Oh. I forgot. Barr said he would do as Trump asked. Maybe in another dimension. So is Barr the good guy, keeping Trump in check? Or is he Trump's cleaner, doing his bidding and falsifying evidence against political enemies to force investigations and dropping charges against his allies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: So is Barr the good guy, keeping Trump in check? Or is he Trump's cleaner, doing his bidding and falsifying evidence against political enemies to force investigations and dropping charges against his allies? Like most people in DC, I suspect Barr is in it for himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 Anyone ever know anyone who calls themself "magnificently brilliant" besides Trump? If someone else said this same thing to you, what would you think of them? 3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: So is Barr the good guy, keeping Trump in check? Or is he Trump's cleaner, doing his bidding and falsifying evidence against political enemies to force investigations and dropping charges against his allies? It's not a binary choice. Barr has been doing Trump's bidding. This particular order from Trump to Barr seems to be beyond what Barr is willing to do, probably for fear it could cause him legal troubles down the line. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 22 minutes ago, Kemp said: It's not a binary choice. Barr has been doing Trump's bidding. This particular order from Trump to Barr seems to be beyond what Barr is willing to do, probably for fear it could cause him legal troubles down the line. Do you think that nothing Barr has done previously could backfire legally? Or are his actions likely justified based on evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 20 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Do you think that nothing Barr has done previously could backfire legally? Or are his actions likely justified based on evidence? I think other things he's done could backfire on him, maybe legally, or maybe as something to force him out of public life because of being disgraced. I believe they are likely unjustified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 On 10/21/2020 at 8:24 AM, Kemp said: Trump has broken the law of the Emoluments clause of the Constitution. That's an indisputable fact. Should he be prosecuted? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Gary M said: 1. This has nothing to do with what will happen after Trump leaves office. Let's see what happens then. Remember what Trump's lawyers have argued, to date. 2. Trump has an overtly friendly Supreme Court.https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/profiting-off-the-presidency-trumps-violations-of-the-emoluments-clauses/ Edited October 22, 2020 by Kemp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Kemp said: I think other things he's done could backfire on him, maybe legally, or maybe as something to force him out of public life because of being disgraced. I believe they are likely unjustified. Opinion duly noted. And opinions... 1 hour ago, Gary M said: Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 2 hours ago, Kemp said: 1. This has nothing to do with what will happen after Trump leaves office. Let's see what happens then. Remember what Trump's lawyers have argued, to date. You said he is violation Emoluments clasue, a private person can't do that. 2 hours ago, Kemp said: 2. Trump has an overtly friendly Supreme Court. 🤣😂🤣 2 hours ago, Kemp said: https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/profiting-off-the-presidency-trumps-violations-of-the-emoluments-clauses/ ^^^ Opinion Blog ^^^^ 🤡 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 12 minutes ago, Gary M said: You said he is violation Emoluments clasue, a private person can't do that. 🤣😂🤣 ^^^ Opinion Blog ^^^^ 🤡 The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution prohibits the President from accepting any benefits from foreign states unless he first obtains the consent of Congress. President Trump has never sought or received such consent. The Founders adopted the Foreign Emoluments Clause because they believed America would be harmed if federal officeholders, including the President, made policy decisions based on their own self-interest rather than the national interest. There is nothing members of Congress can do to redress this constitutional violation so long as the President is accepting foreign government benefits without first obtaining congressional consent. That’s why the courts must enforce the Constitution. 18 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...well if you say so, that MUST be the case...SMH.......keep reading MEIN Kemp's posts....... If you knew how stupidly ironic this post is..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 (edited) For 3 yrs. she couldn't shut her mouth lying about Trump/Russia. Now, no comment on the most treasonous act ever committed by a Presidential candidate. The Left considers her silence on Biden's dirty work as Patriotic. Edited October 22, 2020 by I am the egg man 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 Belleavia just played Nancy's statement. He said it sounded like a kidnapping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts