Jump to content

Will GregPersons Continue to Beat His Wife?


Will he?  

32 members have voted

  1. 1. Will our beloved Mr. Persons continue to beat his wife?

    • Yes
      28
    • Yes
      4


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

Every time I challenge a different poster, I seem to gain a new identity. This is the 16th identity I've been ascribed and I can't wait to find out more. Seems like you guys are getting new challengers on a regular basis and it's inconceivable they're different people. (I think it's part of the "paid protestors" idea — y'all are so delusional, you have no idea how many people ***** hate your guts)

 

Do you think language has fixed meanings? Where do you think language comes from? Do you think there is a Language God who gives us new words every few years? Very curious how "the mutability of language" is not something you are capable of understanding... especially when you do have posts that come up when searching "White genocide"!!!!!


Quoted from the other thread because I’m not going to type the same thing out twice.

 

To your point about language evolving, while that is true that’s not what’s happening here.  Evolutionary change is organic, and happens gradually over a long period of time.  It is also  generally rejected by linguists because the meaning of words is essential to idea sharing and communication.

 

People attempting to abruptly force feed starkly different new meanings to commonly understood words, who then attempt to use those words as political clubs in order to bully people into accepting Marxist dogma are #######s of the highest order who should be soundly rejected as dishonest at best, and evil at worst.

 

With that said, are there certain genocides you find acceptable?  Stack rank your genocides for me with those you find most acceptable at the top, and those more reprehensible at the bottom.  The Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, the Holodomor, the Rape of Nanking, the Serbian Problem in Croatia, the Partition of India, the Biafra, the Killing Fields, the Burundian Genocide, and lastly the blossoming genocide in South Africa.  Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

So by saying I'm not racists is proof I'm not racist?  Did I get that right? 

 

Close. Your certainty that you could not be racist is what proves you are racist. Yes. 

 

Do you think you can figure out why that is?

 

Hint: It is what is in all of your posts, and what I have repeatedly describes as the "oxygen" of racism. 

 

 

3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


Quoted from the other thread because I’m not going to type the same thing out twice.

 

To your point about language evolving, while that is true that’s not what’s happening here.  Evolutionary change is organic, and happens gradually over a long period of time.  It is also  generally rejected by linguists because the meaning of words is essential to idea sharing and communication.

 

People attempting to abruptly force feed starkly different new meanings to commonly understood words, who then attempt to use those words as political clubs in order to bully people into accepting Marxist dogma are #######s of the highest order who should be soundly rejected as dishonest at best, and evil at worst.

 

With that said, are there certain genocides you find acceptable?  Stack rank your genocides for me with those you find most acceptable at the top, and those more reprehensible at the bottom.  The Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, the Holodomor, the Rape of Nanking, the Serbian Problem in Croatia, the Partition of India, the Biafra, the Killing Fields, the Burundian Genocide, and lastly the blossoming genocide in South Africa.  Thanks in advance.

 

Love that you want to "rank" human suffering!!!!!!!!!  This is also a very popular idea with White Supremacists. 

 

Also, in your list of genocides, it seems there's A FEW MAJOR ONES missing.

Do you know what they might be? 

Both seem pretty relevant these days...

 

Have you considered doing any research into genocides in American history? Since it's a subject you're interested in, there's a lot to find there.

Edited by GregPersons
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

Close. Your certainty that you could not be racist is what proves you are racist. Yes. 

 

Do you think you can figure out why that is?

 

Hint: It is what is in all of your posts, and what I have repeatedly describes as the "oxygen" of racism. 

 

 

 

Love that you want to "rank" human suffering!!!!!!!!!  This is also a very popular idea with White Supremacists. 

What is your solution to black on black violence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

Love that you want to "rank" human suffering!!!!!!!!!  This is also a very popular idea with White Supremacists. 

 

Also, in your list of genocides, it seems there's A FEW MAJOR ONES missing.

Do you know what they might be? 

Both seem pretty relevant these days...

 

Have you considered doing any research into genocides in American history? Since it's a subject you're interested in, there's a lot to find there.


Wrong, I’ve asked you to rank human suffering because your posts here seem to imply that there are certain genocides that don’t merit concern.  These aren’t words that I’ve chosen to use, they are words that you have chosen to use.

 

If you don’t like it, choose to use different words.

 

As for the list, it’s be no means comprehensive.  If you have any personal favorite genocides that I failed to include in my brief list, feel free to add them, and feel free to share a few anecdotes about why you enjoy them.

 

Once you’re done with that, I’ll happily hear you lecture me about what my stances on the American government are, as I’m sure you’re more informed of them than I am.

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:


Wrong, I’ve asked you to rank human suffering because your posts here seem to imply that there are certain genocides that don’t merit concern.  These aren’t words that I’ve chosen to use, they are words that you have chosen to use.

 

If you don’t like it, choose to use different words.

 

As for the list, it’s be nice means comprehensive.  If you have any personal favorite genocides that I failed to include in my brief list, feel free to add them, and feel free to share a few anecdotes about why you enjoy them.

 

Once you’re done with that, I’ll happily hear you lecture me about what my stances on the American government are, as I’m sure you’re more informed of them than I am.

 

That's a lot of words to dodge some pretty easy questions. 

 

Define "Racism" for me, since you have the "objective" answer. Then tell me if "objectivity" is real.  And I'd also like to know why you failed to include any of the American examples, since that's more relevant to our discussion. 

 

I'm guessing it's because White Americans were the ones who did them and it's not helpful to your argument. But I don't want to put any words in your mouth. So just go ahead and educate me on the correct definitions on "Racism" and "Objectivity" and which one of those is real. 

 

Can't wait to be educated by The Smartest Man In The ROOM!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

That's a lot of words to dodge some pretty easy questions. 

 

Define "Racism" for me, since you have the "objective" answer. Then tell me if "objectivity" is real.  And I'd also like to know why you failed to include any of the American examples, since that's more relevant to our discussion. 

 

I'm guessing it's because White Americans were the ones who did them and it's not helpful to your argument. But I don't want to put any words in your mouth. So just go ahead and educate me on the correct definitions on "Racism" and "Objectivity" and which one of those is real. 

 

Can't wait to be educated by The Smartest Man In The ROOM!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

Close. Your certainty that you could not be racist is what proves you are racist. Yes. 

 

Do you think you can figure out why that is?

 

Hint: It is what is in all of your posts, and what I have repeatedly describes as the "oxygen" of racism. 

 

 

 

This is ***** hilarious.  I've never seen anyone tap dance around a direct question better than you have done.  Bra*****ingvo!!  

 

So what you're saying is:

 

If I was adamant about not being gay does that in fact make me gay or does this only work with being a racist?

 

If I was adamant about not being an alcoholic does that in fact make me an alcoholic or does this only work with being a racist?

 

If I was adamant about not being homophobic does that in fact make me homophobic or does that just work with being a racist?

 

So if I'm adamant about not being a racist I'm a racist and if I say I'm a racist I'm a racists.  Did I get this right?

 

And finally I have NOT been adamant about being racist. As a matter of fact I don't even think I've said I'm NOT a racists.  All I've done the past couple days is ask you to provide proof that I AM a racist which you have conveniently not been able to do.  So you can ***** off now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

Has anyone called him Hogboy in any of the recent threads? If not then he's been around a long time to know that name. 

 

Repeatedly :)

 

I'm keeping a handy list of all of the identities I've been given by people who are "not racist"

 

I'm also keeping a handy list of all of the identities I've ascribed to posters here. It's actually 0, despite everybody assuming "racist" is an identity they have to have and my insistence that "racist" is better understood as a verb, not a noun.

 

So everybody is assuming they're being called "a racist" as their identity. Then trying to guess my identity. While I am talking about racist actions.  And the majority of the board continues speaking and behaving racist, while telling me my identity, and also that they could not be racist because of their daddy and granddaddy.

 

If you could understand why that is so funny, we'd both be laughing right now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chef Jim said:

 

This is ***** hilarious.  I've never seen anyone tap dance around a direct question better than you have done.  Bra*****ingvo!!  

 

So what you're saying is:

 

If I was adamant about not being gay does that in fact make me gay or does this only work with being a racist?

 

If I was adamant about not being an alcoholic does that in fact make me an alcoholic or does this only work with being a racist?

 

If I was adamant about not being homophobic does that in fact make me homophobic or does that just work with being a racist?

 

So if I'm adamant about not being a racist I'm a racist and if I say I'm a racist I'm a racists.  Did I get this right?

 

And finally I have NOT been adamant about being racist. As a matter of fact I don't even think I've said I'm NOT a racists.  All I've done the past couple days is ask you to provide proof that I AM a racist which you have conveniently not been able to do.  So you can ***** off now. 

 

This is your own confusion between "racist" and "a racist" —  also why I posted the 101 thread.

 

I'm talking about actions, you're talking about identity

 

Just like billsfan1959, all you are doing is getting mad at me because you tricked yourself.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GregPersons said:

 

This is your own confusion between "racist" and "a racist" —  also why I posted the 101 thread.

 

I'm talking about actions, you're talking about identity

 

Just like billsfan1959, all you are doing is getting mad at me because you tricked yourself.  

 

 

What actions (or probably more inactions) are you referring to that say I'm a racist? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GregPersons said:

 

This is your own confusion between "racist" and "a racist" —  also why I posted the 101 thread.

 

I'm talking about actions, you're talking about identity

 

Just like billsfan1959, all you are doing is getting mad at me because you tricked yourself.  

 

What is your solution to black on black violence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GregPersons said:

 

That's a lot of words to dodge some pretty easy questions. 

 

Define "Racism" for me, since you have the "objective" answer. Then tell me if "objectivity" is real.  And I'd also like to know why you failed to include any of the American examples, since that's more relevant to our discussion. 

 

I'm guessing it's because White Americans were the ones who did them and it's not helpful to your argument. But I don't want to put any words in your mouth. So just go ahead and educate me on the correct definitions on "Racism" and "Objectivity" and which one of those is real. 

 

Can't wait to be educated by The Smartest Man In The ROOM!


If an American genocide is your favorite, by all means add it to your list!  The list is yours, after all, and I don’t want to influence you one way of the other.  The short sampling I provided you with was limited to acts of the last roughly 100 years, and only scratched the surface of genocides globally during that time.
 

As for the definition of racist, it has already been provided for you by another poster, and was provided early on in your short stay.

 

Moving on to your inquiry about objectivity, where you imply that logic itself is racist, and will no doubt continue on to that there is no truth but instead there are 7 billion or so personal truths; again I‘ll simply ask why you’re taking up my task in our argument, and working hard to defeat yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chef Jim said:

What actions (or probably more inactions) are you referring to that say I'm a racist? 

 

Read the 101 thread for a full explanation, then you may continue with me. 

 

You don't get to skip to 201 by walking out of 101 and saying it's all BS, bud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


If an American genocide is your favorite, by all means add it to your list!  The list is yours, after all, and I don’t want to influence you one way of the other.  The short sampling I provided you with was limited to acts of the last roughly 100 years, and only scratched the surface of genocides globally during that time.
 

As for the definition of racist, it has already been provided for you by another poster, and was provided early on in your short stay.

 

Moving on to your inquiry about objectivity, where you imply that logic itself is racist, and will no doubt continue on to that there is no truth but instead there are 7 billion or so personal truths; again I‘ll simply ask why you’re taking up my task in our argument, and working hard to defeat yourself.

 

So your definition of "racism" is actually "prejudice" then? You deny that racism is structural? You can't say with your own keyboard what you think racism is, otherwise? 

 

Also, are you saying "objectivity" is real? Just curious. You seem to operate under the assumption there is an absolute "correct" answer to things, and that you know what they are.

 

Again. You think you're clever. It's adorable. It's like you are a child, playing hide & seek, and you're in the middle of the living room with the pillow on your head. And you're singing "You can't seee meeeee.... it's objectively true you can't seee meeee"

 

lol

Edited by GregPersons
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GregPersons said:

 

Read the 101 thread for a full explanation, then you may continue with me. 

 

You don't get to skip to 201 by walking out of 101 and saying it's all BS, bud.

 

No those are general. I want SPECIFIC things I've done, not done, said, not said that have brought you to the definitive conclusion that I am in FACT a racists.

 

I'll wait..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chef Jim said:

No those are general. I want SPECIFIC things I've done, not done, said, not said that have brought you to the definitive conclusion that I am in FACT a racists.

 

I'll wait..............

 

Again it's you wanting me to take a deep dive into your post history. Again I am declining this very odd invitation.

 

Again you will find your SPECIFIC answer in the specific thread. 

 

These posts here. Also racist. 

 

Any effort to uphold the racist structures in place = racist.

What you are doing = racist. 

Can you understand this = no.

Will you argue it still = yes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GregPersons said:

 

Again it's you wanting me to take a deep dive into your post history. Again I am declining this very odd invitation.

 

Again you will find your SPECIFIC answer in the specific thread. 

 

These posts here. Also racist. 

 

Any effort to uphold the racist structures in place = racist.

What you are doing = racist. 

Can you understand this = no.

Will you argue it still = yes.

 

 

Why are you declining to dive into my posting history.  

 

What racist structures am I upholding.  Be specific!!

What am I doing that is racist.  Be specific!

 

I want to learn.  I want to know.  Please help me Obi Wan!  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

Why are you declining to dive into my posting history.  

 

What racist structures am I upholding.  Be specific!!

What am I doing that is racist.  Be specific!

 

I want to learn.  I want to know.  Please help me Obi Wan!  

 

 

Why am I declining? Because you are disgusting to me and unpleasant. Dealing with you this much is not fun. I don't want to read any more of your drivel than I need to. You're not attractive, and you're not smart. I don't enjoy your writing. Why would I do that?

 

I understand why you want it. You think you're special. You think you are the center of this conversation. You think you deserve special treatment on the subject of race. You think that the work of "self examination" should be done for you, at your beck and call. 

 

These are just some of the ways in which you are racist and upholding racism. You can see many more specific examples in your post history and thought processes. Self examination is hard! It's why White folks have avoided it for generations! Often very violently! 

 

Let me know if this makes sense. Happy to help you on your journey. Its not easy!

Edited by GregPersons
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Why are you declining to dive into my posting history.  

 

What racist structures am I upholding.  Be specific!!

What am I doing that is racist.  Be specific!

 

I want to learn.  I want to know.  Please help me Obi Wan!  

 

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GregPersons said:

 

Why am I declining? Because you are disgusting to me and unpleasant. Dealing with you this much is not fun. I don't want to read any more of your drivel than I need to. You're not attractive, and you're not smart. I don't enjoy your writing. Why would I do that?

 

I understand why you want it. You think you're special. You think you are the center of this conversation. You think you deserve special treatment on the subject of race. You think that the work of "self examination" should be done for you, at your beck and call. 

 

These are just some of the ways in which you are racist and upholding racism. You can see many more specific examples in your post history and thought processes. Self examination is hard! It's why White folks have avoided it for generations! Often very violently! 

 

So you got nothing.  That's what I figured.  You seem to have no problem reading my "drivel" in your "Everybody's a Racist But Me!" threads but when pressed to prove your little experiment all you come up with is cryptic bull####.  

 

Why are you here?  What is your end game?  What are you expecting?  If we all admit we are racist will you say "my job is done here" and leave?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:

 

So you got nothing.  That's what I figured.  You seem to have no problem reading my "drivel" in your "Everybody's a Racist But Me!" threads but when pressed to prove your little experiment all you come up with is cryptic bull####.  

 

Why are you here?  What is your end game?  What are you expecting?  If we all admit we are racist will you say "my job is done here" and leave?


His end game is advancing Marxist structures by attempting to shame people.

 

The people he’s trying to shame have nothing to be ashamed of, however, which is why he insists on the wholesale creation of new definitions for commonly understood words; and insists that the application of logic and the understanding of truth itself is racist.

 

The purpose is the rejection of Western Enlightenment values.

 

He thinks this is clever or novel.  It isn’t.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


His end game is advancing Marxist structures by attempting to shame people.

 

The people he’s trying to shame have nothing to be ashamed of, however, which is why he insists on the wholesale creation of new definitions for commonly understood words; and insists that the application of logic and the understanding of truth itself is racist.

 

The purpose is the rejection of Western Enlightenment values.

 

He thinks this is clever or novel.  It isn’t.

 

In case you missed it earlier, he already posted (without irony): "wasn't Marx proven entirely correct in the end". 

 

He's not hiding what he is. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Hey buddy, I'm a lover, not a fighter!

Note: I do reject religion, but I do not believe life is meaningless.

 


I’m guessing you never watched the big Lebowski ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


His end game is advancing Marxist structures by attempting to shame people.

 

The people he’s trying to shame have nothing to be ashamed of, however, which is why he insists on the wholesale creation of new definitions for commonly understood words; and insists that the application of logic and the understanding of truth itself is racist.

 

The purpose is the rejection of Western Enlightenment values.

 

He thinks this is clever or novel.  It isn’t.


Novel?  No. 
Clever? No

Sad?  Yeah. 
Confused?  Yeah. 

 

According to his logic because I don’t wear pink, March in breast cancer awareness parades and donate to breast cancer research  I’m for  breast cancer. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

In case you missed it earlier, he already posted (without irony): "wasn't Marx proven entirely correct in the end". 

 

He's not hiding what he is. 


They never can.

 

Also hilarious is that for whatever reason Marxists never seem to read much Marx.  Anyone who has read Marx knows that his predictions failed to come true.  He was a lousy prognosticator.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:


Novel?  No. 
Clever? No

Sad?  Yeah. 
Confused?  Yeah. 

 

According to his logic because I don’t wear pink, March in breast cancer awareness parades and donate to breast cancer research  I’m for  breast cancer. 
 

 

 

October is Breast Cancer Pink.

 

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


I started it, could not finish. And yes, I know people love the film.

 

 

Me too !

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Novel?  No. 
Clever? No

Sad?  Yeah. 
Confused?  Yeah. 

 

According to his logic because I don’t wear pink, March in breast cancer awareness parades and donate to breast cancer research  I’m for  breast cancer. 
 

 


Remember, he doesn’t adhere to logic, because logic is racist.

 

As such, he has no logic to accord to.

 

He’s just out here speaking HIS truth, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...