Jump to content

The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19


Hedge

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

The GAO report on the disbursement of federal aid funds?

 

You are shocked that the government is not efficient in quickly implementing a totally new program for which the infrastructure didn't exist prior to the pandemic?  Blow me down.

 

I feel so sad for your clients.

 

Hoax.  Your malaise actually is related to your status as the founding member of the Fluffer List.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

 

Question.  Is today’s GAO report about the ineptitude of the Trump Administration with respect to its COVID-19 response a hoax?

 

Somebody's gonna get fired for that report!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shoshin said:

 

I wonder who knows more about the TX hospitalization situation: You or Gov. Abbott: 

 

 

 

 


:rolleyes:  Preparing. If you noticed, I did state that I assumed they would be monitoring the situation closely.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shoshin said:

 

I'm not sure your point about the Russia data. Do you want to cherry pick the data from an untrustworthy country to make some kind of point? 

 

 

 

Keep up.   The panic porn of the day is that Europe has successfully contained the virus, while the US has not.  It's an easy stat to fudge when you exclude a certain very large country from the data that hasn't gone though a peak.   But, details.

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax.  Your malaise actually is related to your status as the founding member of the Fluffer List.  

 

A polluter must pollute.  Otherwise, there's no sense in being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shoshin said:

 

Somebody's gonna get fired for that report!

 

Sadly that’s true.  There’s a lot of blame to go around in this situation.  Unfortunately what should be the concomitant accountability is absent.  Which means that instead of trying to accept the report as constructive criticism and a useful learning tool the plan likely will be to bury it and to ignore its findings. 

2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Keep up.   The panic porn of the day is that Europe has successfully contained the virus, while the US has not.  It's an easy stat to fudge when you exclude a certain very large country from the data that hasn't gone though a peak.   But, details.

 

A polluter must pollute.  Otherwise, there's no sense in being.

 

As I recall you’re the one who injected the Fluffer question into this morning’s discussion.  Unfortunately it was answered in a way that seems to have dampened your cheer and brought you chagrin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Sadly that’s true.  There’s a lot of blame to go around in this situation.  Unfortunately what should be the concomitant accountability is absent.  Which means that instead of trying to accept the report as constructive criticism and a useful learning tool the plan likely will be to bury it and to ignore its findings. 

 

 

 

I have a hunch you didn't read the GAO report nor its recommendations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

I have a hunch you didn't read the GAO report nor its recommendations.

 

Surely as the intellectual leader of this community you know that the proper construction of your point is “read neither the GAO report nor its recommendations.”  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Surely as the intellectual leader of this community you know that the proper construction of your point is “read neither the GAO report nor its recommendations.”  

 

A polluter must pollute.  There's no other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

A polluter must pollute.  There's no other way.

 

Agreed.  Stop posting your drivel so we can have some intelligent discourse around here about things like the hottest new conspiracy theory, how dumb the liberals are, and the best Trump Hoax.  I demand better quality in these conversations.  And it starts with you, sir. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Agreed.  Stop posting your drivel so we can have some intelligent discourse around here about things like the hottest new conspiracy theory, how dumb the liberals are, and the best Trump Hoax.  I demand better quality in these conversations.  And it starts with you, sir. 

A polluter must pollute.  There's no other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

I take it you don’t have any hot new conspiracy theories.  Must not be much to talk about today.  

The January 4, 2017 White House meeting notes are not a conspiracy theory.  They are a fact.

 

A polluter must pollute.  There's no other way.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GG said:

The January 4, 2017 White House meeting notes are not a conspiracy theory.  They are a fact.

 

Your interpretation of them is a wild conspiracy very few lawyers outside of ones with anonymous Twitter accounts agree with.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

Your interpretation of them is a wild conspiracy very few lawyers outside of ones with anonymous Twitter accounts agree with.

 

Seems that you agree that the memo is not a hoax then?  Tell that to your buddy.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

Seems that you agree that the memo is not a hoax then?  Tell that to your buddy.

 

Not sure about the memo's authenticity either way but to oblige you 5G - hey @SectionC3 buddy, the literal memo might not be a hoax

2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Seems that you agree that the memo is not a hoax then?  Tell that to your buddy.

 

Glad you agree your interpretation is a wild conspiracy very few lawyers outside of ones with anonymous Twitter accounts agree with, though.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

Not sure about the memo's authenticity either way but to oblige you 5G - hey @SectionC3 buddy, the literal memo might not be a hoax

 

Glad you agree your interpretation is a wild conspiracy very few lawyers outside of ones with anonymous Twitter accounts agree with, though.

 

I guess we have found one thing to scratch off the Trump Hoax list.  Authenticity of whatever memo it is that is under discussion is acknowledged.  The alt-wrong interpretation of its contents remains a hoax. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...