Jump to content

The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19


Hedge

Recommended Posts

On 8/3/2020 at 3:21 PM, GG said:

 

The unofficial GG model has the entire country on the Wuhan downswing by the end of August, now that the most populous states are past the peak.  Will be interesting to see the spin once new cases drop precipitously in sept.

 

Just checking in to see how the unofficial GG model is holding up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, shoshin said:


Unsurprising news as the college cases freak out rises. 
 

 

 

 

the fact that nobody is sick couldn't be because the 'tests" could just find common cold coronavirus after multiplying their genetic sample 35 TRILLION times

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/4/2020 at 6:48 PM, Chef Jim said:


Oh so now you NEED California.

 

😁

 

I know you're just bustin' chops, but a lot of people need CA to open up. We have a few really nice projects that are not only on hold, but also being cut back dramatically because companies are bleeding out and cutting previous jobs that were on the books to help their margins. As you know, that trickles down to the companies who were building those facilities and filling them with technology.

 

It's genuinely maddening to me that CA Covid numbers are ridiculously low, and Newsom doesn't care. He needs the state to schitt the bed until after the election.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

This "belief" is the very core of liberalism:

 

 

 

I made these mobility plots for about 9 states of varying latitude. Non-immunoligical legislation doesnt dent these viruses. It's all about Hope-Simpson seasonality and HIT and population density and things like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a cryptic naughty message from the moderators for talking COVID on the main football board. So sensitive.

 

Trying to be right by posting here. But really... page 1171 is the best we got?

 

Here it is. UCLA, Stanford study finds for average 50-64 year old, chances of dying from COVID-19 are 1 in 19.1M

 

And I was spanked for panning masks on the sideline.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, boater said:

I got a cryptic naughty message from the moderators for talking COVID on the main football board. So sensitive.

 

Trying to be right by posting here. But really... page 1171 is the best we got?

 

Here it is. UCLA, Stanford study finds for average 50-64 year old, chances of dying from COVID-19 are 1 in 19.1M

 

And I was spanked for panning masks on the sideline.

 

Same happened to me, there is a narrative that she needs to maintain. Although I do think the masks are good insurance for the football staff.

Edited by BeerLeagueHockey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deaths and everything else continue to go lower.  Except cases even though it did drop nicely today.  Hope that continues.   I’m still confused by the JH model of expected deaths.  They clearly don’t buy into the T cell + Covid herd-like immunity and believe in the older theory that it re emerges seasonally like the flu.   I’m highly skeptical of that previous theory based on a number of factors.

 

in any case, another good reporting day.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Magox said:

Deaths and everything else continue to go lower.  Except cases even though it did drop nicely today.  Hope that continues.   I’m still confused by the JH model of expected deaths.  They clearly don’t buy into the T cell + Covid herd-like immunity and believe in the older theory that it re emerges seasonally like the flu.   I’m highly skeptical of that previous theory based on a number of factors.

 

in any case, another good reporting day.

 

Being involved in some Engineering models in the past, I honestly think they do not have a model input or "handle" for the innate T-cell / herd immunity.  I really think it'll be tough to get to the low end of the IHME numbers.  But I am just a guy on the internet.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BeerLeagueHockey said:

 

Being involved in some Engineering models in the past, I honestly think they do not have a model input or "handle" for the innate T-cell / herd immunity.  I really think it'll be tough to get to the low end of the IHME numbers.  But I am just a guy on the internet.


Those are my suspicions as well.  I would be surprised if we hit over 250k by the end of the year.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Magox said:

Deaths and everything else continue to go lower.  Except cases even though it did drop nicely today.  Hope that continues.   I’m still confused by the JH model of expected deaths.  They clearly don’t buy into the T cell + Covid herd-like immunity and believe in the older theory that it re emerges seasonally like the flu.   I’m highly skeptical of that previous theory based on a number of factors.

 

in any case, another good reporting day.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Media:  *compares these numbers with models that shut down the planet in March and then proceed to demand from governors explanations and justifications for 6 feet for life and why the goal posts have moved*

 

 

Jk that ain't happening.  

 

"Cases!" on college campuses!!!   "Long term side effects!!"  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...