Jump to content

Whistleblower Has Been Backed Up By Multiple Witnesses


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

BREAKING: In excerpts of Gordon Sondland’s deposition, the ambassador to the European Union revised his earlier testimony. He said he acknowledged telling one of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s advisers in Warsaw that “resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/2019/11/05/a27d7c48-ff4e-11e9-8bab-0fc209e065a8_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:


He didn’t. Ask Zelensky. 

 

Who the hell needs to talk to the purported victim, when there's a PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT* available to express his unfounded and unsupported concerns?!?

 

 

 

*Of course, the purple heart recipient must have the correct opinion for his military decorations to count.

Edited by Koko78
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Who the hell needs to talk to the purported victim, when there's a PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT* available to express his unfounded and unsupported concerns?!?

 

 

 

*Of course, the purple heart recipient must have the correct opinion for his military decorations to count.

Who spoke under oath? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

There is no exculpatory evidence or Mark Meddows and the other Nazis would be screaming all about. 

 

And yet you can't figure out why the Democrats lost in 2016, could not take the Senate in 2018, and are going to get thumped in 2020.

 

Amazing.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

There is no exculpatory evidence or Mark Meddows and the other Nazis would be screaming all about. 

 

Don't worry - DR will posts some tweets any moment now and you'll get attacked personally (it's all they can do when the facts are against them)

 

Why conspire to lie?

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Other than agreeing with the whistleblowers opinion of the phone call, has any witness offered any new evidence of this ‘plot’? Have any texts between staff lovers been released? Oh wait...that was the last plot. They’re all starting to look alike.?

 

From what I can tell, the left keeps trying to release 'new' information that really isn't new and it really isn't even helpful, but it provides an incoherent unsubstantiated possibility of an updated report from a previous testimony to a new event that no one can corroborate.

 

I want to suggest it's too bad the left is too stupid to understand that they're doing more damage to themselves than to Trump, but, honestly, all I want at this juncture is for Trump to get re-elected so I can see how long the left can self-destruct before they finally realize what they're doing to their party.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

From what I can tell, the left keeps trying to release 'new' information that really isn't new and it really isn't even helpful, but it provides an incoherent unsubstantiated possibility of an updated report from a previous testimony to a new event that no one can corroborate.

 

I want to suggest it's too bad the left is too stupid to understand that they're doing more damage to themselves than to Trump, but, honestly, all I want at this juncture is for Trump to get re-elected so I can see how long the left can self-destruct before they finally realize what they're doing to their party.

 

 

Thanks, that’s what I thought. It’s gonna be an awfully short trial if the defense just needs to ask each witness if the have anything new to offer and they’re all forced to admit....’no, not really’. This has the Mueller fiasco written all over it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

if the defense just needs to ask each witness if the have anything new to offer 

 

The trial has yet to start and one of the witnesses amended his testimony to save his own ass and blame the administration but nothing to see here ***** THE LIBZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Thanks, that’s what I thought. It’s gonna be an awfully short trial if the defense just needs to ask each witness if the have anything new to offer and they’re all forced to admit....’no, not really’. This has the Mueller fiasco written all over it!

 

nah, lawyers will never tire of something to say or futz around

 

for one trial they insisted on going through the details on 15,000 cheques until it was stopped after 3 solid weeks

 

"is this a cheque"  yes

"from a bank"  yes

"is the account there, and if so can you read it"  yes, 325-83589 (up to 15,000 times if it was required, all the same account)

 

 

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...