Jump to content

Whistleblower Has Been Backed Up By Multiple Witnesses


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

So Lindsey Graham is going to send a letter to Nancy telling her the Senate won't convict Trump, so don't waste everyone's time. 

Or, he's afraid that he will have to vote to exonerate an obviously guilty man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

No, just telling Nancy to move on. 

Begging, more like it. They just don't want to have to go on record defending a criminal. 

 

Look at it this way. You guys hate W Bush, McCain, and Romney, the same will be true of Trump soon. When these senators are running a few years hence, they will still have to defend their votes on this. It will be harder to explain when he is even unpopular among the former cultists 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Begging, more like it. They just don't want to have to go on record defending a criminal. 

 

Look at it this way. You guys hate W Bush, McCain, and Romney, the same will be true of Trump soon. 

 

We ALREADY hate Trump, you ignorant ****head.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

okay... so if/when the House takes a floor vote (and it passes, which is highly doubtful, which is why Nancy won't do it), they will then be required to conduct a formal proceeding and if Articles of Impeachment are passed (which they won't be by a formal process), then yes, the Senate will have a trial.

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Begging, more like it. They just don't want to have to go on record defending a criminal

 

Look at it this way. You guys hate W Bush, McCain, and Romney, the same will be true of Trump soon. When these senators are running a few years hence, they will still have to defend their votes on this. It will be harder to explain when he is even unpopular among the former cultists 

 

You mean like Dems are with Biden?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

No, just telling Nancy to move on. 

 

25 minutes ago, Foxx said:

okay... so if/when the House takes a floor vote (and it passes, which is highly doubtful, which is why Nancy won't do it), they will then be required to conduct a formal proceeding and if Articles of Impeachment are passed (which they won't be by a formal process), then yes, the Senate will have a trial.

If I were Trump, I’d tweet to Pelosi, “Bring it, B word!”

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Foxx said:

okay... so if/when the House takes a floor vote (and it passes, which is highly doubtful, which is why Nancy won't do it), they will then be required to conduct a formal proceeding and if Articles of Impeachment are passed (which they won't be by a formal process), then yes, the Senate will have a trial.

 

Yes, but we all know that Nasty Nancy won't hold a vote for two reasons:

 

1.) She doesn't actually have the votes; and

 

2.) She would virtually guarantee that the Democrats lose the House in 2020.

3 hours ago, Foxx said:

 

Seriously, whose Mayor Willie do I have to Kamala Harris to get these $166,000 per month no-show jobs?

2 hours ago, Chef Jim said:


So you have definitive proof Trump is a criminal?  

 

He beat Hillary, that conclusively PROVES that Trump is guilty! "Facts" are for the weak minded; we must be morally correct as a society, regardless of petty stupid things like reality.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...