B-Man Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Re-quoted for Truth Josh Hawley ✔@HawleyMO You want to know why the FBI spied on @realDonaldTrump & launched multi-year investigations? It’s about @realDonaldTrump VOTERS. Unelected progressive elites in our govt have nothing but contempt for them. Total, complete contempt This has ALWAYS been the case. The entrenched government officials who whole basis of actions is that they "know whats best for the people"..........especially the minorities because they are not capable of progress without us. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Tillis: "The legislative leaders have access to all except for 1/10th of 1% of the report." (Again, those numbers do not back up the "BARR IS HIDING SOMETHING!!" screams from the Ds and MSM.) T: "Since when is the special counsel in the business of exonerating the subject of an investigation?" B: "They are not." T: "They are not. So why would somebody put something like that in the report?" (I do wonder about that too. And why did Barr put the sentence in his summary?) Scope of OIG (Horowitz report) is focused FISA and further back. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 21 minutes ago, Foxx said: was just coming to post the Grassley clip. love the mic drop! the walk off is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Crapo: "When did the DOJ and FBI know that the Democratic party paid for Christopher Steele's dossier, which then served as the foundation for the Carter Page FISA application." Barr: "I don't know the answer to that." Crapo: "Uhhhh are you investigating to determine that?" Barr: "Yes." Then Crapo (man, how did he get elected with that last name!?) asked if the DOJ/FBI was investigating before July 2016, and again that is under investigation. Basically, this section was all about leaks and ongoing investigations. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Then Crapo (man, how did he get elected with that last name!?) How is his name not blocked by the board filter, like *****, *****, #######, and the other Senators? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Barr won't show tomorrow (still tech unconfirmed) Other sources confirming the above now... the letter should be fun. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Barr won't show tomorrow (still tech unconfirmed) Other sources confirming the above now... the letter should be fun. No surprise. And since Lindsay Graham said, "We are done" that means, we are done. And now, it is the Trump-side's turn. It ain't gonna be pretty. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: No surprise. And since Lindsay Graham said, "We are done" that means, we are done. And now, it is the Trump-side's turn. It ain't gonna be pretty. i would think that whether or not they're done will depend largely upon how the Mueller testimony in the House Judiciary goes. Edited May 1, 2019 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 and all this because... Hillary has a 96% chance of winning and Trump has no path to 270! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) Cruz: Wow. He's masterful. Truly. Ooooh, he touched on the wire, but it wasn't expounded upon. 4 minutes ago, Foxx said: i would think that whether or not they're done will depend largely upon how the Mueller testimony in the House Judiciary goes. I don't know about that. It would have to be egregious and completely refute everything Barr has said to this point. Graham was pretty much tough-titty-said-the-kitty-when-the-milk-ran-dry when asked about calling Mueller and continuing on with this farce. Edited May 1, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Let me echo earlier sentiments thanking all for being active participants in this discussion so simple minded folks like me can get a readers digest version of everything going on. My eyes would have glossed over almost immediately had I tried to sit down and watch all of this 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 46 minutes ago, row_33 said: and all this because... Hillary has a 96% chance of winning and Trump has no path to 270! In fairness, Trump didn't have a path to 270. He had a path to 304! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Sasse: wow. I doubt all of that is shown as a clip on the news. Was he smacking DiFi around on the sly vis-à-vis her Chinese spy driver? LOL "How sleazy this city is". As I mentioned, I liked what I heard from him as well 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 59 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Barr won't show tomorrow (still tech unconfirmed) Other sources confirming the above now... the letter should be fun. Wow, the comments on her tweet are amazing. These deranged dipschiffs don't understand what they watched (or, more accurately, the summary that was downloaded into their little TDS-addled NPC brains.) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Wow, the comments on her tweet are amazing. These deranged dipschiffs don't understand what they watched (or, more accurately, the summary that was downloaded into their little TDS-addled NPC brains.) "Great! Bring @KamalaHarris @amyklobuchar & @maziehirono in to “bat cleanup “. They are lawmakers I could watch all day!" O.o Holy *****. That HAS to be a bot. No one, and I mean no one, would want to be subjected to those three. Hirono is borderline ######ed. The other two are simply partisan hacks who continually try and deflect and instead sound like stupid liars. Bots, for the sake of humanity, that account better be a bot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts