Jump to content

Hate Crime or Hoax?


The_Dude

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, ALF said:

Police employee's brutal assault caught on camera

 

Authorities in Baltimore are looking for three suspects in connection with an attack on a civilian employee of the Baltimore Police Department 

 

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2019/07/27/baltimore-police-employee-assault-caught-on-camera-bpb-orig-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/top-news-videos/

 

you have to be careful where you walk in any part of the country

 

Wonder if Omar or Tlaib commented on this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 946
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

59 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Wonder if Omar or Tlaib commented on this? 

 

Eh, some people did some things, so what?

 

They prefer to talk about real problems, like how Jews are termites/vermin in need of extermination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Judge dismisses motions by 'Empire' actor's attorneys

 

Quote

The judge dismissed the motion for a new judge and also denied a motion by Smollett's attorneys to intervene in the case.

"It's become abundantly clear that no one wants to deal with the merits of this case," Glandian said. "Nobody really wants the truth here....We are disappointed with the court's ruling and we're going to explore our options."

 

I do enjoy that his attorney claims "no one wants to deal with the merits of this case. Nobody really wants the truth here".

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He can't move, he's SO close to that Subway which makes such good sandwiches you go back and get it after getting attacked and bleached by racists!

 

That double meatball marinara that didn’t spill a drop during the assault 

 

Acting for a living is a 2+2=5 universe 

 

Sucks to enter the 2+2=4 universe in one fell swoop

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Judge to rule on tossing suit against Smollett in October
 

A federal judge hearing the city of Chicago's lawsuit against Jussie Smollett says she'll rule on the actor's request to toss the suit in October.
 

The 10-minute status hearing Tuesday was the first since the civil case was moved to federal court from state court. The former "Empire" actor didn't attend the hearing in Chicago.
 

</snip>
 

Next hearing October 22nd. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Wow, that is some reason to not have to pay -  I filed a police report but didn't think they'd really investigate it so well.  <_<  :blink:

I still am not sure this should happen (law of unintended consequences and all that), but the defense's reasoning is :wacko:

 

Jussie Smollett lawyers: Even if actor faked attack, cops didn’t need to investigate it so vigorously
 

SNEED EXCLUSIVE: The ex-”Empire’’ actor’s latest court filing, while not admitting he staged the incident, pins the decision to spend so much money on the police probe squarely on law enforcement.
 

</snip>
 

“We contend the city is wrong,” Quinlan said of the city’s assertion that Smollett should have known the city would spend nearly 2,000 hours investigating. “ ... The mere fact somebody filed a police report doesn’t presume the investigation will be done and certainly not to the extent of what the city is claiming.
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

The dumbass should have just kept his mouth shut when he got his corrupt deal. Spiking the ball before doing a touchdown dance afterwards just pissed the city off.

He should take lessons from Tony Podesta on how to act when you are being investigated.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Wow, that is some reason to not have to pay -  I filed a police report but didn't think they'd really investigate it so well.  <_<  :blink:

I still am not sure this should happen (law of unintended consequences and all that), but the defense's reasoning is :wacko:

 

Jussie Smollett lawyers: Even if actor faked attack, cops didn’t need to investigate it so vigorously
 

SNEED EXCLUSIVE: The ex-”Empire’’ actor’s latest court filing, while not admitting he staged the incident, pins the decision to spend so much money on the police probe squarely on law enforcement.
 

</snip>
 

“We contend the city is wrong,” Quinlan said of the city’s assertion that Smollett should have known the city would spend nearly 2,000 hours investigating. “ ... The mere fact somebody filed a police report doesn’t presume the investigation will be done and certainly not to the extent of what the city is claiming.
 

</snip>

 

 

To be fair, that's probably the only legal defense he has left that a jury might buy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and to add to the foment.......and you thought "Moonbeam Jerry" (recycled 37 times) was bad?..........

 

California’s Newsom signs bill allowing citizens to refuse to help a police officer

By Edmund DeMarche | Fox News

 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, on Tuesday signed a bill that no longer requires any "able-bodied person 18 years of age or older" in the state to help an officer who requests assistance during an arrest.

The Sacramento Bee reported that the old law, the California Posse Comitatus Act of 1872, was common in the country’s early days, but Sen. Bob Hertzberg, a Los Angeles Democrat who sponsored the bill, called the old law a “vestige of a bygone era." The law was employed to help catch runaway slaves, the report said.

The old law made it a misdemeanor that carried a fine of up to $1,000 for refusing to help a police officer who requested assistance during an arrest.

The report said Newsom did not issue a statement after signing the bill.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/californias-newsom-signs-bill-allowing-citizen-to-refuse-to-help-a-police-officer

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

...and to add to the foment.......and you thought "Moonbeam Jerry" (recycled 37 times) was bad?..........

 

California’s Newsom signs bill allowing citizens to refuse to help a police officer

By Edmund DeMarche | Fox News

 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, on Tuesday signed a bill that no longer requires any "able-bodied person 18 years of age or older" in the state to help an officer who requests assistance during an arrest.

The Sacramento Bee reported that the old law, the California Posse Comitatus Act of 1872, was common in the country’s early days, but Sen. Bob Hertzberg, a Los Angeles Democrat who sponsored the bill, called the old law a “vestige of a bygone era." The law was employed to help catch runaway slaves, the report said.

The old law made it a misdemeanor that carried a fine of up to $1,000 for refusing to help a police officer who requested assistance during an arrest.

The report said Newsom did not issue a statement after signing the bill.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/californias-newsom-signs-bill-allowing-citizen-to-refuse-to-help-a-police-officer

 

 

 

A law enacted in 1872 was used to help catch runaway slaves, seven years after slavery was outlawed?  So it had to be repealed 150 years later?

 

That is the single bullshittiest of bull#### justifications I have ever seen.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

A law enacted in 1872 was used to help catch runaway slaves, seven years after slavery was outlawed?  So it had to be repealed 150 years later?

 

That is the single bullshittiest of bull#### justifications I have ever seen.

 

Nice to see that they were serious in 1872.  That $1000 fine would be around $31,000  today adjusted for inflation.  They really had the posse on a pedestal. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I think that this post fits under this title.

 

 

The Trayvon Hoax That Divided America Is About to Be Exposed

by Jack Cashill

 

Original Article

 

 

On Monday. September 16, Joel Gilbert will preview his new documentary, “The Trayvon Hoax,” in the 500-seat Ballroom of the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. The screening begins at 1 p.m. Admission is free, and Gilbert is encouraging all interested parties to come see for themselves what could be a game-changer in the way the media report racially-charged news. Gilbert’s findings are that significant.

 

(snip)

 

he has unearthed a legal fraud the likes of which I know no parallel. Not only has Gilbert discovered it, but he has also proved it six ways from Sunday, including DNA and handwriting analysis.

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...